Virginia Chandler Obituary - Mountain View, CA (1941-2026) 50%

By The Mercury News86%

7/24/2026, 12:05:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 137 hits. Analysis detected 946 faulty-reasoning hits from 598 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 50.1% and a BS Rank of 50% (11,046 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 50.50% of the article peer group.

Virginia passed away peacefully on April, 28th 2026. 
Ginny and I met on a ski slope on Mount Shasta 62 years ago and we’ve stayed together ever since. 
She was an accomplished scholar; she graduated with honors from Notre Dame De Namur University. 
She spent 30 years working as a medical researcher at Stanford Research Institute in Menlo Park, California. 
Besides being an expert skier, she studied Yoga and eventually became a Yoga instructor in her free time. 
Ginny loved music, was a talented pianist, and had a beautiful singing voice. 
She also took ukulele lessons, and became quite proficient at the art. 
She also was a great cook and created some wonderful exotic dishes native to various countries. 
Her garden was replete with a marvelous assortment of herbs, flowering orchids, bougainvilleas, and many other flowering plants. 
Ginny loved animals; from dogs and cats to even the lizards that scurried around her garden. 
She loved birds, owls and robins, but especially the tiny colored birds that sang lovely songs while she sat near her garden. 
Ginny loved people and always tried to see the best in them. 
She was always more interested in what others had to say than expounding on her own work or accomplishments. 
Aside from that, Ginny was a very good and kind person. 
I never heard her say an unkind word about anyone; it just wasn’t in her nature. 
And, by being the good person that she was, she made others much better people in return. 
Ginny loved to travel. 
We traveled from Alaska to the South Pacific, to Europe, to the Greek Islands, to southwest American Indian reservations, especially visiting ancient ruins left by civilizations of the distant past. 
Once, after having climbed to the top of a 300-foot- high Mayan pyramid where we could see miles of jungle in all directions, I was fascinated by all the green bumps that could be seen in the distance and which signified yet unexplored pyramids and temples. 
When I finally looked away from the huge expanse of jungle, Ginny was nowhere to be seen. 
She was gone. 
My first terrible thought was that she had fallen off the pyramid and was lying somewhere below. 
As I cautiously looked over the side of the pyramid, I saw Ginny hanging from a rusty old chain, lowering herself down to the next level. 
After lowering myself down by the same rusty old chain, I asked her why she didn’t tell me she was going over the side on that old chain; she just said, “I don’t know, It just seemed like the right thing to do. 
” Such is one of our many memories of our travel adventures. 
Now that my beautiful Ginny with her beautiful smile and musical laughter is gone, I only have those bittersweet memories left; but at least I have those. 
I will always remember her with my whole heart, Body, and soul. 
Two days after her death, I wrote a short poem for her; I’ll end this eulogy with it. 
To Ginny: 
How quickly do the seasons change. 
How quickly do chilly winds turn to summer breezes. 
But love, true love, remains unchanged. 
Even when one lover is taken away, their love does not die, It remains forever in the ether of the universe. 
Until the lovers are joined once more in that unknown cosmic realm. 
Jose C. de Leon 
A memorial service will be held on July 25th 2026 at 2:00 pm at Saint Athanasius Catholic Church, 160 N. 
Rengstorff Ave., Mountain View California 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.9%The Mercury News: 1.4%East Bay Times: 2.9%Confirmation Bias11.9%This article: 3.3%The Mercury News: 0.2%East Bay Times: 0.3%Anchoring Bias3.3%This article: 10.9%The Mercury News: 2.3%East Bay Times: 2.6%Availability Heuristic10.9%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.6%East Bay Times: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 7.7%The Mercury News: 0.7%East Bay Times: 0.5%Hindsight Bias7.7%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.7%East Bay Times: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%The Mercury News: 0.5%East Bay Times: 3.5%Framing Effect4.5%This article: 4.5%The Mercury News: 0.5%East Bay Times: 0.5%Loss Aversion4.5%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.2%East Bay Times: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%The Mercury News: 0.1%East Bay Times: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect2.0%This article: 9.2%The Mercury News: 4.9%East Bay Times: 2.0%Optimism Bias9.2%This article: 4.7%The Mercury News: 1.1%East Bay Times: 1.3%Pessimism Bias4.7%This article: 10.0%The Mercury News: 1.3%East Bay Times: 7.9%Negativity Bias10.0%This article: 3.2%The Mercury News: 0.7%East Bay Times: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.1%East Bay Times: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 1.5%East Bay Times: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 22.9%The Mercury News: 38.9%East Bay Times: 7.7%Halo Effect22.9%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.5%East Bay Times: 0.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%The Mercury News: 1.2%East Bay Times: 0.4%Primacy Effect3.7%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.8%The Mercury News: 2.8%East Bay Times: 2.5%Appeal to Authority2.8%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 4.4%East Bay Times: 3.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.1%East Bay Times: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 13.7%The Mercury News: 14.1%East Bay Times: 5.3%Appeal to Emotion13.7%This article: 1.0%The Mercury News: 0.8%East Bay Times: 0.5%Begging the Question1.0%This article: 2.8%The Mercury News: 2.3%East Bay Times: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.8%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.7%The Mercury News: 4.0%East Bay Times: 2.3%Anecdotal2.7%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.7%The Mercury News: 2.4%East Bay Times: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.7%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.2%The Mercury News: 0.9%East Bay Times: 1.0%Unattributed Quote7.2%This article: 7.2%The Mercury News: 0.8%East Bay Times: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection7.2%This article: 13.5%The Mercury News: 35.3%East Bay Times: 8.1%Biased Writer Voice13.5%This article: 1.0%The Mercury News: 2.3%East Bay Times: 2.8%Indoctrination1.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Mercury News: 1.0%East Bay Times: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

598 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers4.2%attributed speech573writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageJose C. de Leon • 20 words • 0.0% coverageSaint Athanasius Catholic Church • 5 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jose C. de Leon

0%flagged-word coverage
20 attributed words80% of attributed speech88% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Biased Writer Voice-14.1 ptsWriter: 14.1%Jose C. de Leon: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-7.5 ptsWriter: 7.5%Jose C. de Leon: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-7.5 ptsWriter: 7.5%Jose C. de Leon: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-1.0 ptsWriter: 1.0%Jose C. de Leon: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.