BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 341 faulty-reasoning hits from 262 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 30.3% and a BS Rank of 14% (18,919 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 86.40% of the article peer group.

Iran launched strikes against Israel, reportedly the Islamic Republic's first attacks against the county since the start of the ceasefire in early April. 
On Sunday, Iran launched missiles toward Israel, the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) announced. 
"The IDF identified missiles launched from Iran toward Israel. 
Defensive systems are operating to intercept the threat," the IDF stated, adding that sirens had sounded in several areas across the country. 
Earlier in the day, the IDF announced that Israel had struck a Hezbollah command center in Lebanon. 
"The targeted command center was used by Hezbollah terrorists to advance terror attacks against Israeli civilians and IDF soldiers operating in southern Lebanon," the Israeli military said. 
While speaking with Fox News Chief Foreign Correspondent Trey Yingst, President Donald Trump said the attack would not help with negotiations. 
"You've shot your missiles, that's enough. 
Get back to the table and make a deal," Trump reportedly said about the Islamic Republic. 
The outlet also reported that the IDF stated the immediate threat had passed and that people were then able to leave protected spaces. 
Trump told Axios that he was going to call Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and urge him not to retaliate for the attacks. 
"I am going call Bibi right now and tell him not to retaliate. 
Each of them had their fun. 
Israel had its strikes, and Iran had its strikes. 
We don't need another one," Trump told the outlet, which reported that Israel claimed it had intercepted the missiles. 
This is a breaking story. 
Check back for updates. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 3.0%One America News Network: 4.6%Confirmation Bias8.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 1.0%One America News Network: 2.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.8%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 2.7%One America News Network: 3.9%Availability Heuristic8.8%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 0.5%One America News Network: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 1.7%One America News Network: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 18.3%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 14.5%One America News Network: 15.3%Framing Effect18.3%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 0.7%One America News Network: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 0.4%One America News Network: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.3%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 3.5%One America News Network: 4.3%Optimism Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 1.2%One America News Network: 1.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.8%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 7.8%One America News Network: 11.8%Negativity Bias8.8%This article: 8.8%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 2.2%One America News Network: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias8.8%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 0.4%One America News Network: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 5.2%One America News Network: 3.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 10.3%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 2.0%One America News Network: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias10.3%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 2.6%One America News Network: 5.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 1.0%One America News Network: 2.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 4.7%One America News Network: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 1.2%One America News Network: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 2.7%One America News Network: 6.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 2.3%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 1.3%One America News Network: 1.8%False Dilemma2.3%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 1.0%One America News Network: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 5.5%One America News Network: 5.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 0.6%One America News Network: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 6.1%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 0.6%One America News Network: 1.1%Bandwagon6.1%This article: 10.3%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 9.4%One America News Network: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion10.3%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 1.7%One America News Network: 1.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 8.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 1.7%One America News Network: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 7.3%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 0.5%One America News Network: 0.6%Burden of Proof7.3%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 0.3%One America News Network: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.3%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 1.7%One America News Network: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.3%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.4%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Middle Ground3.4%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.4%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 1.6%One America News Network: 1.7%Unattributed Quote3.4%This article: 3.4%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 2.2%One America News Network: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection3.4%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 5.1%One America News Network: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 13.4%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 2.7%One America News Network: 1.1%Indoctrination13.4%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 1.4%One America News Network: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 8.8%One America News Network: 3.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Addie Davis: 2.1%One America News Network: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

262 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers66%attributed speech88writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageIsraeli Defense Forces (IDF) • 13 words • 0.0% coverageIsraeli Defense Forces (IDF) • 9 words • 100.0% coverageIsraeli Defense Forces (IDF) • 22 words • 0.0% coverageIsraeli Defense Forces (IDF) • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 21 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 6 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 23 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 13 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 6 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
113 attributed words65% of attributed speech83% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Indoctrination+31.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 31.0%31.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.