What happened to British Gen. Cornwallis after his Yorktown surrender  the final battle of the Revolutionary War? 22%

By Dave Urbanski32%

7/4/2026, 11:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 54.6% saturation with 263 hits. Analysis detected 762 faulty-reasoning hits from 482 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 35.4% and a BS Rank of 22% (17,230 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 78.70% of the article peer group.

It's common knowledge that Cornwallis' surrender at Yorktown, Virginia, effectively ended the Revolutionary War  but what happened to the British general after that humiliating defeat? 
According to the Library of Virginia, the Siege of Yorktown  which turned out to be the final major military engagement of the Revolutionary War  took place in the autumn of 1781. 
The British Army and its commanding general, Charles Cornwallis, were headquartered in the coastal Virginia town. 
However, a French fleet under the command of Admiral François-Joseph-Paul de Grasse drove a British fleet from the Capes of Virginia, which made it impossible for Cornwallis to receive supplies and reinforcements, the Library of Virginia said. 
American Gen. 
George Washington led his army from New York to Virginia, and  along with a large French and American army under Comte de Rochambeau  Washington laid siege to the British at Yorktown, the Library of Virginia said, adding that those forces joined the Marquis de Lafayette, who was commanding an American army that had been fighting the British in Virginia for six months. 
The siege began on October 6, 1781, as the Americans and French formed a semicircle outside of the town and began an artillery bombardment. 
A successful storming of two British redoubts, or small temporary defensive enclosures, convinced Cornwallis that his position was untenable, and he surrendered his army to the combined American and French forces on October 19. 
He refused, however, to surrender in person and delegated the humiliating duty to his second in command. 
Washington consequently directed his second in command to receive the surrender. 
Below is one of several famed clips from Mel Gibson's starring Hollywood turn in "The Patriot" depicting Cornwallis' disbelief that an army of "peasants" actually had defeated him: 
RELATED: BREAKING: Cornwallis surrenders in Yorktown; end of war may be in sight 
Nine days after his surrender, Cornwallis signed a parole document, the Library of Virginia said; under its terms, Cornwallis was allowed to leave Virginia and return to Great Britain on the condition that he would engage in no further military action against the United States. 
However, Cornwallis' army remained in the U.S. as prisoners of war until they were exchanged or paroled, the Library of Virginia said, adding that Cornwallis  "an able military commander"  was "received warmly in England and served as governor-general of India from 1786 until his death in 1805." 
The Library of Virginia noted that a formal peace treaty ended the Revolutionary War nearly two years after Cornwallis surrendered at Yorktown, and King George III recognized the independence of the United States of America. 
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and agree to receive content that may sometimes include advertisements. 
You may opt out at any time. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 1.9%Blaze Media: 5.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.5%Blaze Media: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Dave Urbanski: 4.9%Blaze Media: 3.2%Availability Heuristic5.8%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.6%Blaze Media: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 5.4%Dave Urbanski: 1.0%Blaze Media: 0.8%Hindsight Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.1%Blaze Media: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Dave Urbanski: 5.2%Blaze Media: 9.6%Framing Effect5.8%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.6%Blaze Media: 1.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.7%Blaze Media: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.9%Dave Urbanski: 11.4%Blaze Media: 9.8%Negativity Bias8.9%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.8%Blaze Media: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 1.4%Blaze Media: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.5%Blaze Media: 2.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.4%Blaze Media: 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 10.2%Dave Urbanski: 1.9%Blaze Media: 2.6%Halo Effect10.2%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.7%Dave Urbanski: 1.0%Blaze Media: 1.1%Recency Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 2.0%Blaze Media: 2.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 1.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 54.6%Dave Urbanski: 3.5%Blaze Media: 3.7%Appeal to Authority54.6%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 2.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 1.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 1.2%Blaze Media: 8.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.6%Blaze Media: 0.8%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.7%Dave Urbanski: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.9%Bandwagon2.7%This article: 8.9%Dave Urbanski: 4.2%Blaze Media: 8.2%Appeal to Emotion8.9%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.2%Blaze Media: 1.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 7.7%Dave Urbanski: 0.6%Blaze Media: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.7%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.8%Dave Urbanski: 2.3%Blaze Media: 2.6%Anecdotal5.8%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 1.0%Blaze Media: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 4.1%Blaze Media: 2.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 5.8%Dave Urbanski: 2.5%Blaze Media: 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection5.8%This article: 19.1%Dave Urbanski: 6.2%Blaze Media: 10.6%Biased Writer Voice19.1%This article: 5.8%Dave Urbanski: 2.4%Blaze Media: 4.5%Indoctrination5.8%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.5%Blaze Media: 7.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 8.9%Dave Urbanski: 3.1%Blaze Media: 2.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…8.9%

482 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker55%attributed speech219writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageLibrary of Virginia • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageLibrary of Virginia • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageLibrary of Virginia • 64 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageLibrary of Virginia • 45 words • 0.0% coverageLibrary of Virginia • 49 words • 100.0% coverageLibrary of Virginia • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Library of Virginia

100%flagged-word coverage
263 attributed words100% of attributed speech52% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -19.6 ptsWriter: 19.6%Library of Virginia: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-1.0 ptsWriter: 19.6%Library of Virginia: 18.6%18.6%Quote-first Misdirection-12.8 ptsWriter: 12.8%Library of Virginia: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-12.8 ptsWriter: 12.8%Library of Virginia: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.