Path tracker: Tropical Storm Bertha forms in the Gulf 31%

By Gabe Hauari0% James Powel0% USA TODAY13%

7/20/2026, 1:03:14 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 56.3% saturation with 152 hits. Analysis detected 453 faulty-reasoning hits from 270 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40.1% and a BS Rank of 31% (15,300 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 69.90% of the article peer group.

A tropical depression that formed in the Gulf has now strengthened into Tropical Storm Bertha, according to the National Hurricane Center. 
A NHC advisory issued the evening of July 20 stated that Bertha is located about 110 miles south of Panama City, Florida with maximum sustained winds of 40 miles per hour. 
It added that "additional strengthening is possible." 
A tropical storm watch is in effect for a large chunk of the Gulf Coast, from the Ochlockonee River west to the Mississippi/Alabama border, according to the hurricane center. 
A tropical storm watch means tropical storm conditions are possible in the next 24 to 48 hours. 
The Center said that Bertha has been "drifting erratically" but the storm is expected to move to the northwest and west. 
"On the forecast track, Bertha will move near or along the northern Gulf coast during the next several days," the advisory reads. 
The NHC said the system is expected to produce rainfall totals of 2 to 4 inches, with locally higher totals around 8 inches, through Friday along the Gulf Coast and adjacent inland locations from western Florida to the Middle Texas coast, including southern portions of Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana. 
The rainfall may produce flash flooding, especially in urban areas. 
Swells generated by the system are also expected to affect portions of the Gulf coast of Florida and are likely to spread westward during the week, the NHC said, with the swells likely to cause "life-threatening" surf and rip current conditions. 
**Canadian wildfires:** These cities are under code purple, maroon for bad air quality 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.6%Gabe Hauari: 4.2%Associated Press: 2.9%Availability Heuristic12.6%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 18.1%Gabe Hauari: 6.0%Associated Press: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias18.1%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 5.3%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.9%Associated Press: 1.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 23.0%Gabe Hauari: 7.7%Associated Press: 1.3%Pessimism Bias23.0%This article: 18.9%Gabe Hauari: 12.6%Associated Press: 7.3%Negativity Bias18.9%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 3.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 56.3%Gabe Hauari: 18.8%Associated Press: 4.1%Appeal to Authority56.3%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 3.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 4.8%Gabe Hauari: 3.2%Associated Press: 0.3%Red Herring4.8%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 15.2%Gabe Hauari: 5.1%Associated Press: 4.6%Appeal to Emotion15.2%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 14.1%Gabe Hauari: 4.7%Associated Press: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)14.1%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 4.8%Gabe Hauari: 1.6%Associated Press: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice4.8%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gabe Hauari: 0.0%Associated Press: 3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

270 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker55%attributed speech121writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageNational Hurricane Center • 21 words • 0.0% coverageNational Hurricane Center • 31 words • 0.0% coverageNational Hurricane Center • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageNational Hurricane Center • 49 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageNational Hurricane Center • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverage
95%flagged-word coverage
149 attributed words100% of attributed speech93% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Biased Writer Voice-10.7 ptsWriter: 10.7%National Hurricane Center: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.