Violent punks caught on video ganging up on, brutally beating elderly man by Baltimore 7-Eleven  while wielding rifle, sword | Blaze Media 61%

By Dave Urbanski35%

7/16/2026, 11:39:09 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Availability Heuristic, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 93 hits. Analysis detected 630 faulty-reasoning hits from 594 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 56.5% and a BS Rank of 61% (8,423 of 21,175 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 60.20% of the article peer group.

Baltimore Police posted video Wednesday showing six "younger males" ganging up on and brutally beating a 74-year-old man outside a 7-Eleven; the attackers also were wielding a rifle and a sword, police said. 
Police said the "attempted armed robbery" occurred in the 2500 block of Liberty Heights Avenue around 3:46 a.m. 
July 7. 
'Wish he was armed and eliminated some/all [of] the threat.' 
The video police posted shows the victim seemingly headed to the door of the convenience store when two of the offenders  one of them pointing what police called a "gray assault-style rifle" at the elderly man  run up to him. 
The rest of the suspects follow seconds later and begin surrounding the victim. 
Soon the group begins taking turns shoving and throwing objects at the elderly man, who does his best to fight them off and shield himself. 
But one cowardly culprit sneaks behind the victim and shoves him to the parking lot surface, after which the others take turns stomping him. 
One of the attackers appears to bash the victim over the head with the rifle. 
In another portion of the video, the elderly man goes after a suspect appearing to hold the rifle, but a second suspect throws an object at the victim from behind, then scampers away. 
Soon a suspect appearing to hold a sword approaches the victim and waves it at him before he and another attacker throw objects at the elderly man at the same time. 
**RELATED:** **Elderly Air Force veteran assaulted, robbed after withdrawing cash from ATM; video shows juvenile taking victim's wallet** 
In one of the more gut-wrenching portions of the video, the victim is holding what appears to be a pair of milk crates to defend himself when one of the attackers shoves him to the parking lot surface, after which he's stomped and punched. 
Seconds later, after the victim rises to his feet, the same attacker who just shoved him from behind repeats his cowardly act, knocking the elderly man to the ground from behind again  and then skips away in what appears to be a kind of celebration. 
The victim tries to get up, but the same attacker who knocked him down twice jumps in the air and kicks him. 
The video doesn't show how the incident was resolved. 
According to WJZ-TV, a store employee said the 7-Eleven was closed at the time of the attack, and police said the victim was treated for minor injuries afterward. 
Police said robbery detectives need the help of the public to identify the culprits seen in the video, and those with information are urged to call Citywide Robbery detectives at 410-366-6311 or Metro Crime Stoppers at 1-866-7Lockup. 
A number of commenters who reacted under the police department's X post about the incident were far from happy: 
* "Stop pretending anything will happen if they're found," one said. 
"Please." 
* "ATTEMPTED armed robbery?!? 
How about ASSAULT WITH A DEADLY WEAPON?!? 
Fk you Baltimore. 
No wonder you're a third world s**t hole," another commenter wrote. 
"How ANY law abiding citizen could live there is beyond me." 
* "Hope we catch them, we all got somebody heading home or out this time of day," another commenter stated. 
"Wish he was armed and eliminated some/all [of] the threat." 
*Like Blaze News? 
Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. 
*Sign up here! 
* 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.0%Dave Urbanski: 1.8%Blaze Media: 5.6%Confirmation Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.4%Dave Urbanski: 4.5%Blaze Media: 3.1%Availability Heuristic10.4%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.5%Blaze Media: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 7.7%Dave Urbanski: 1.1%Blaze Media: 0.8%Hindsight Bias7.7%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.1%Blaze Media: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Dave Urbanski: 5.1%Blaze Media: 9.7%Framing Effect5.6%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.4%Blaze Media: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.7%Blaze Media: 1.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Dave Urbanski: 0.8%Blaze Media: 1.5%Pessimism Bias5.2%This article: 15.3%Dave Urbanski: 10.6%Blaze Media: 9.5%Negativity Bias15.3%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.9%Blaze Media: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 1.4%Blaze Media: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.6%Blaze Media: 2.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Dave Urbanski: 0.4%Blaze Media: 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 2.0%Blaze Media: 2.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 1.1%Blaze Media: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Dave Urbanski: 2.2%Blaze Media: 2.6%Ad Hominem2.4%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 1.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.7%Dave Urbanski: 3.7%Blaze Media: 3.7%Appeal to Authority4.7%This article: 1.2%Dave Urbanski: 0.4%Blaze Media: 2.4%False Dilemma1.2%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 1.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 1.4%Blaze Media: 9.0%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.8%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.2%Dave Urbanski: 4.4%Blaze Media: 8.1%Appeal to Emotion6.2%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.2%Blaze Media: 1.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.6%Blaze Media: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 2.0%Blaze Media: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 1.0%Blaze Media: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 1.9%Dave Urbanski: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.1%Personal Incredulity1.9%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 14.8%Dave Urbanski: 4.5%Blaze Media: 2.7%Unattributed Quote14.8%This article: 3.4%Dave Urbanski: 2.5%Blaze Media: 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection3.4%This article: 15.7%Dave Urbanski: 5.9%Blaze Media: 10.4%Biased Writer Voice15.7%This article: 2.9%Dave Urbanski: 2.7%Blaze Media: 4.6%Indoctrination2.9%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.6%Blaze Media: 7.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Dave Urbanski: 3.6%Blaze Media: 2.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.9%

594 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers27%attributed speech436writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageBaltimore Police • 33 words • 0.0% coverageBaltimore Police • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageBaltimore Police • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWJZ-TV • 28 words • 0.0% coverageBaltimore Police • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

WJZ-TV

100%flagged-word coverage
28 attributed words18% of attributed speech67% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Biased Writer Voice-21.3 ptsWriter: 21.3%WJZ-TV: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-20.2 ptsWriter: 20.2%WJZ-TV: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.3 ptsWriter: 5.3%WJZ-TV: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-4.6 ptsWriter: 4.6%WJZ-TV: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-3.9 ptsWriter: 3.9%WJZ-TV: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.