MS NOW94%

Trump explodes at ‘Meet the Press’ host: ‘You’re either crooked or you’re stupid’ 63%

By Erum Salam75%

6/7/2026, 6:32:04 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 41.7% saturation with 242 hits. Analysis detected 871 faulty-reasoning hits from 580 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 58.3% and a BS Rank of 63% (7,645 of 20,472 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 62.70% of the article peer group.

In an explosive interview with NBC aired Sunday, President Donald Trump cut the grilling short and left the set after peppering “Meet the Press” moderator Kristen Welker with insults. 
“You’re either crooked or you’re stupid,” Trump told Welker, who kept a cool demeanor despite the president’s barrage of disparaging slurs. 
Moments before he attacked her, Trump  without providing any evidence  said he believes elections in the U.S. are rigged. 
Then he lambasted television news networks, singling out NBC, CBS and ABC. 
“They’re crooked just like you’re crooked, your press is crooked. 
And ‘Meet the Press’ is crooked,” Trump said. 
“To be fair, I’m not crooked,” Welker shot back. 
“But let’s continue.”“ 
Let’s call it quits because I’ve had enough,” the president told Welker, who is the second woman and first Black journalist to helm the network’s flagship program. 
Trump added, “Thank you, darling. 
Have a good time.” 
It was not the first time Trump has berated a female journalist on the job covering his presidency. 
In November 2025, he told Bloomberg’s Catherine Lucey to stop talking, saying, “Quiet. 
Quiet, piggy.” 
One month later, he told ABC’s Rachel Scott she was “the most obnoxious reporter in the whole place.” 
Last month, he called MS NOW White House reporter Akayla Gardner “a dumb person” for pointing out that the cost of his White House ballroom project had doubled since it was first announced. 
He has also repeatedly lashed out at CNN’s Kaitlan Collins, criticizing her for not smiling enough. 
The wide-ranging interview, which was taped last week on a farm in Wisconsin, was interrupted by the loud sound of heavy rain on the metal roof of the barn where they met. 
Welker questioned Trump on his war with Iran, his “anti-weaponization” fund and the upcoming midterm elections. 
On his nearly $1.8 billion fund aimed at compensating people who say they were wrongly prosecuted, including Jan. 
6 Capitol rioters, Trump said “people were destroyed by dirty cops and by weaponization. 
Many of those people should be compensated.” 
He described the people who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, as people who were “being ushered into the building” by law enforcement. 
A federal judge temporarily blocked the fund last month and acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said last week the administration would not be moving forward with the fund, which faced bipartisan backlash. 
When asked if the administration would pursue other avenues to revive it, Trump said he does not know what will ultimately happen and called Welker and her network “the fake dirty press.” 
Despite campaigning on a promise to end foreign wars, Trump denied that he made such statements. 
He characterized the Iran war, launched by the U.S. and Israel on Feb. 28, as necessary to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. 
When asked about the rising cost of living as a result of the war, specifically gas and fertilizer, Trump chastised Welker. 
“Are you ready? 
Am I allowed to talk? 
You keep asking questions and you don’t listen to the answers,” he said. 
“I love the farmers and the farmers love me,” Trump said, adding that prices will come down after the war. 
Welker suggested to her viewers Sunday that she and the president had a cordial conversation Saturday, saying they both “acknowledged the complications” posed by the rain. 
“He agreed to sit down with me for another ‘Meet the Press’ interview,” she said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.1%Erum Salam: 4.2%MS NOW: 7.6%Confirmation Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 0.7%MS NOW: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 3.2%MS NOW: 3.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 1.1%MS NOW: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 0.8%MS NOW: 1.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 1.4%MS NOW: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 16.9%Erum Salam: 13.7%MS NOW: 15.5%Framing Effect16.9%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 0.3%MS NOW: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 1.2%MS NOW: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 0.3%MS NOW: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.4%Erum Salam: 2.7%MS NOW: 2.4%Optimism Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 1.0%MS NOW: 3.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 41.7%Erum Salam: 15.6%MS NOW: 19.3%Negativity Bias41.7%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 3.0%MS NOW: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 2.4%MS NOW: 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 0.3%MS NOW: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 3.6%MS NOW: 3.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 1.8%MS NOW: 2.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Erum Salam: 3.2%MS NOW: 2.2%Halo Effect2.6%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 0.9%MS NOW: 1.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.1%Erum Salam: 1.7%MS NOW: 1.8%Recency Bias3.1%This article: 4.7%Erum Salam: 0.5%MS NOW: 0.6%Primacy Effect4.7%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 0.3%MS NOW: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 26.6%Erum Salam: 4.9%MS NOW: 4.8%Ad Hominem26.6%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 0.2%MS NOW: 1.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 5.7%MS NOW: 5.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 5.9%Erum Salam: 1.1%MS NOW: 2.2%False Dilemma5.9%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 0.6%MS NOW: 2.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.8%Erum Salam: 5.4%MS NOW: 8.1%Hasty Generalization4.8%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 2.2%MS NOW: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 0.4%MS NOW: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 15.5%Erum Salam: 9.4%MS NOW: 9.9%Appeal to Emotion15.5%This article: 4.1%Erum Salam: 2.1%MS NOW: 2.4%Begging the Question4.1%This article: 3.4%Erum Salam: 4.0%MS NOW: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.4%This article: 2.2%Erum Salam: 0.5%MS NOW: 0.6%Tu Quoque2.2%This article: 3.6%Erum Salam: 2.4%MS NOW: 1.0%Burden of Proof3.6%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 0.2%MS NOW: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 1.7%MS NOW: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.6%Erum Salam: 2.2%MS NOW: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.6%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 0.4%MS NOW: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 0.9%MS NOW: 1.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 2.3%MS NOW: 2.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.2%Erum Salam: 2.4%MS NOW: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection2.2%This article: 3.6%Erum Salam: 5.9%MS NOW: 14.2%Biased Writer Voice3.6%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 0.8%MS NOW: 2.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 2.5%MS NOW: 5.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 1.0%MS NOW: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erum Salam: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

580 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers39%attributed speech356writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 10 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 8 words • 0.0% coverageKristen Welker • 9 words • 0.0% coverageKristen Welker • 3 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 27 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 5 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 14 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 3 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 5 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 13 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 20 words • 0.0% coverageKristen Welker • 26 words • 0.0% coverageKristen Welker • 15 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Trump

93%flagged-word coverage
171 attributed words76% of attributed speech87% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Biased Writer Voice+12.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Trump: 12.3%12.3%Quote-first Misdirection-3.7 ptsWriter: 3.7%Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.