Tropical Storm Bertha weakens further as it inches closer to the southeast Louisiana coast 2%

By Marco Cartolano2%

7/22/2026, 11:45:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Unattributed Quote, and Loss Aversion, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 174 faulty-reasoning hits from 414 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 11.8% and a BS Rank of 2% (20,800 of 21,173 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 98.20% of the article peer group.

Tropical Storm Bertha weakened slightly overnight and is set to make landfall in southeast Louisiana within 24 hours, forecasters with the National Hurricane Center said. 
Most of the rain associated with Bertha remains south of the center as wind shear keeps the storm asymmetrical. 
The risk of minor to moderate flooding from rain continued to decrease by 4 a.m. 
Wednesday. 
Much of the New Orleans area is under a tropical storm warning. 
Bertha is on track to make landfall in Plaquemines Parish by Wednesday evening, and coastal parishes such as Plaquemines, Jefferson, Lafourche, and Terrebonne are particularly at risk of tropical storm conditions. 
Coastal areas could see wind gusts, some locally heavy rainfall and up to 2 to 4 inches of coastal flooding through Thursday afternoon. 
As of 7 a.m., Bertha was close to coastal southeast Louisiana, swirling about 45 miles southeast of the mouth of the Mississippi River. 
The storm was moving west at 5 mph and producing maximum sustained winds of 50 mph. 
Bertha is projected to come ashore along the Louisiana coast by 4 p.m. 
The storm is likely to weaken further before landfall. 
It should reemerge in the Gulf waters by 1 p.m. 
Thursday before becoming post-tropical system and dissipating over Texas Thursday evening into early Friday morning. 
Parts of lower Plaquemines Parish are likely to see tropical storm wind gusts in the next few hours, forecasters with the National Weather Service New Orleans office said. 
Reports of wind gusts of 30 to 40 mph in the open Gulf waters have already been recorded. 
Warnings 
A tropical storm warning has been issued from the Okaloosa/Walton County line in Florida to Morgan City, including the New Orleans metropolitan area and along Lake Pontchartrain 
An additional tropical storm watch is in effect west of Morgan City to Sargent, Texas and Lake Maurepas. 
The following areas in southeast Louisiana are under the tropical storm warning: 
Central Jefferson 
Central Plaquemines 
Central St. 
Charles 
Coastal Jefferson 
Eastern Orleans 
Lower Lafourche 
Lower Plaquemines 
Lower St.Bernard 
Lower St. 
Charles 
Lower Terrebonne 
Southeast St. 
Tammany 
Upper Jefferson 
Upper Plaquemines 
Upper St. 
Bernard 
Upper St. 
Charles 
Western Orleans 
The following are under a tropical storm warning: 
St. 
John The Baptist 
Upper Lafourche 
Upper Terrebonne 
While the forecast projected that Bertha would have minor impacts on the New Orleans area, local officials made preparations to stay safe in the flood-prone region. 
Email Marco Cartolano at Marco.Cartolano@theadvocate.com 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 2.5%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 1.2%nola.com: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Marco Cartolano: 2.8%nola.com: 2.7%Availability Heuristic4.3%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.5%nola.com: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.6%nola.com: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 1.1%nola.com: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.5%nola.com: 4.6%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 6.3%Marco Cartolano: 0.9%nola.com: 0.8%Loss Aversion6.3%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.2%Marco Cartolano: 2.5%nola.com: 3.8%Optimism Bias2.2%This article: 7.5%Marco Cartolano: 0.7%nola.com: 1.9%Pessimism Bias7.5%This article: 3.4%Marco Cartolano: 1.8%nola.com: 3.5%Negativity Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.4%nola.com: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 2.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.6%Marco Cartolano: 0.8%nola.com: 1.2%Recency Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.7%nola.com: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.8%Marco Cartolano: 2.8%nola.com: 3.4%Appeal to Authority6.8%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 1.7%nola.com: 2.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 4.1%nola.com: 3.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 0.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 1.9%nola.com: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.4%nola.com: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.1%nola.com: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.8%Marco Cartolano: 0.7%nola.com: 2.1%Unattributed Quote6.8%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.6%nola.com: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.6%nola.com: 2.5%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.6%nola.com: 0.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marco Cartolano: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.2%Marco Cartolano: 0.3%nola.com: 1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.2%

414 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker1.2%attributed speech409writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageMarco.Cartolano@theadvocate.com • 5 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
5 attributed words100% of attributed speech34% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Marco.Cartolano@theadvocate.com: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-6.8 ptsWriter: 6.8%Marco.Cartolano@theadvocate.com: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.