KTVU61%

PG&E mistakenly notified 120K customers of SF power outage 41%

7/18/2026, 6:44:28 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 39.5% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 715 faulty-reasoning hits from 266 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.7% and a BS Rank of 41% (12,917 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 59.00% of the article peer group.

PG&E mistakenly notified 120,000 San Francisco customers of a power outage Saturday morning, when only about 9,400 customers were without power. 
PG&E says the outage began around 9:45 a.m. during a "routine operational procedure" between two utility substations. 
Initially, 9,400 customers near Golden Gate Park in the Richmond and Presidio were affected, PG&E said. 
By 3 p.m. that number was down to 1,595. 
Power was restored for all customers at 4 p.m. 
The cause of the outage is under investigation. 
"We understand that any disruption in power is frustrating for our customers and we are committed to safe and quick restoration of service," the utility said. 
120,000 PG&E customers incorrectly notified 
When the outage first began, PG&E says its system incorrectly reflected that 120,000 customers were without power, notifying each of those customers. 
"This morning, during a routine operational procedure between two San Francisco substations, protective devices activated and that caused an outage," PG&E said in a statement. 
"Due to the fact that two circuits were impacted, the outage notification system rolled up to a larger protective device, which indicated 120,000 customers were without power. 
That was not correct." 
The utility said its notification system was corrected within 30 minutes. 
Waymo, the autonomous car company, temporarily limited service in parts of the city during the outage, saying it was for an "abundance of caution." 
"Waymo temporarily paused service for approximately one hour to assess local conditions. 
We have resumed service and are providing rides across the majority of our Bay Area service territory," a company representative said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.3%KTVU: 2.9%Confirmation Bias14.3%This article: 7.9%KTVU: 1.0%Anchoring Bias7.9%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 3.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 22.2%KTVU: 6.0%Framing Effect22.2%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 10.9%KTVU: 0.7%Status Quo Bias10.9%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 25.2%KTVU: 6.0%Optimism Bias25.2%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 1.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 14.7%KTVU: 5.1%Negativity Bias14.7%This article: 21.8%KTVU: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias21.8%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 3.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.4%KTVU: 0.9%Recency Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 1.5%KTVU: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias1.5%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 34.2%KTVU: 4.0%Appeal to Authority34.2%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 2.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 18.8%KTVU: 7.0%Appeal to Emotion18.8%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 10.2%KTVU: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.2%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.0%KTVU: 0.6%Burden of Proof3.0%This article: 9.0%KTVU: 0.1%Appeal to Nature9.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 3.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 9.4%KTVU: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.4%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.4%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 39.5%KTVU: 2.7%Unattributed Quote39.5%This article: 9.8%KTVU: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection9.8%This article: 13.2%KTVU: 3.4%Biased Writer Voice13.2%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KTVU: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

266 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers55%attributed speech119writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coveragePG&E • 17 words • 100.0% coveragePG&E • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coveragePG&E • 22 words • 0.0% coveragePG&E • 25 words • 100.0% coveragePG&E • 27 words • 100.0% coveragePG&E • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWaymo • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWaymo • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Waymo

100%flagged-word coverage
36 attributed words24% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Waymo: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-29.4 ptsWriter: 29.4%Waymo: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-21.8 ptsWriter: 21.8%Waymo: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.