Armed thug steals cash from Kentucky Fried Chicken. But when he demands employee's phone, brave worker refuses to back down. 15%

By Dave Urbanski32%

6/27/2026, 5:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 491 faulty-reasoning hits from 512 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 31% and a BS Rank of 15% (18,739 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the article peer group.

Markell Hitchings  a 21-year-year-old cook for a Kentucky Fried Chicken in Florissant, Missouri  had an unsettling notion going through his mind when the restaurant was just getting underway for business Monday morning. 
Hitchings told KSDK-TV his concerns were sparked after he noticed a male dressed in black. 
'I was never afraid at all.' 
"I thought he was a regular customer just going to the bathroom and leaving," Hitchings explained to the station. 
But he recalled something else to KSDK: "I had it back in my mind that he was going to try to do something." 
Turns out Hitchings' unsettling concerns were spot on. 
"He came back there behind our counter, and it all started from there. 
At the time, he was asking my manager for money. 
She dropped to the floor. 
I told her to give him the money because I didn't want her to get hurt," Hitchings recalled to KSDK. 
Employees told the station that after the robber got the cash, he ran out the front door and around to the back of the business. 
Except Hitchings also was out back, KSDK said. 
"He asked me for my cell phone, and I didn't give him my phone  and we got to tussling around in back by the drive-thru," Hitchings recalled to the station. 
Hitchings told KSDK that he and the robber fought for several minutes as the suspect's gun flew out of his hand. 
"I was screaming for help because I was losing adrenaline," Hitchings noted to the station. 
Nevertheless, the courageous cook still had plenty of strength left. 
"Once I had him in a chokehold, I'm on his back," Hitchings recalled to KSDK. 
"He grabbed rocks and tried to smash them over my head, but it didn't work." 
**RELATED:** Blaze News original: 10 times retail workers ended violent threats with absolute finality 
Soon employees at a neighboring business called 911, the station said, adding that Hitchings held down the suspect  Tamon Sleet  until police arrived and arrested him. 
Police added that officers recovered a stolen firearm that was used during the robbery, as well as currency taken from the business. 
Police told KSDK that Sleet tried to strangle a ride-share driver in north St. 
Louis County several days before the KFC robbery  and Hitchings added to the station he's grateful that he, his manager, and the ride-share driver all survived. 
"It all just happened so fast. 
I know it was dangerous. 
I wouldn't advise anyone to do that. 
I was never afraid at all. 
Honestly, I thank God that it all played out the way it did," Hitchings noted to KSDK. 
The station said Sleet faces multiple charges in both cases, including assault, armed criminal action, and vehicle hijacking. 
KSDK said he remained jailed Thursday night on a $250,000 cash-only bond. 
Like Blaze News? 
Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. 
Sign up here! 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.6%Dave Urbanski: 1.9%Blaze Media: 5.6%Confirmation Bias1.6%This article: 2.9%Dave Urbanski: 0.5%Blaze Media: 0.7%Anchoring Bias2.9%This article: 8.0%Dave Urbanski: 4.9%Blaze Media: 3.2%Availability Heuristic8.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.6%Blaze Media: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 6.1%Dave Urbanski: 1.0%Blaze Media: 0.8%Hindsight Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.1%Blaze Media: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.4%Dave Urbanski: 5.2%Blaze Media: 9.6%Framing Effect10.4%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.6%Dave Urbanski: 0.6%Blaze Media: 1.7%Optimism Bias6.6%This article: 1.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.7%Blaze Media: 1.6%Pessimism Bias1.0%This article: 8.0%Dave Urbanski: 11.4%Blaze Media: 9.8%Negativity Bias8.0%This article: 9.2%Dave Urbanski: 0.8%Blaze Media: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias9.2%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 1.4%Blaze Media: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.5%Blaze Media: 2.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.4%Blaze Media: 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Dave Urbanski: 1.9%Blaze Media: 2.6%Halo Effect2.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 1.0%Blaze Media: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%Dave Urbanski: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.5%Primacy Effect6.6%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 2.0%Blaze Media: 2.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 1.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.3%Dave Urbanski: 3.5%Blaze Media: 3.7%Appeal to Authority4.3%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 2.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 1.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 1.2%Blaze Media: 8.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.6%Blaze Media: 0.8%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.6%Dave Urbanski: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.9%Bandwagon0.6%This article: 6.3%Dave Urbanski: 4.2%Blaze Media: 8.2%Appeal to Emotion6.3%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.2%Blaze Media: 1.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.6%Blaze Media: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 1.0%Dave Urbanski: 2.3%Blaze Media: 2.6%Anecdotal1.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.7%Dave Urbanski: 1.0%Blaze Media: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.7%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.9%Dave Urbanski: 4.1%Blaze Media: 2.8%Unattributed Quote2.9%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 2.5%Blaze Media: 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 4.3%Dave Urbanski: 6.2%Blaze Media: 10.6%Biased Writer Voice4.3%This article: 3.3%Dave Urbanski: 2.4%Blaze Media: 4.5%Indoctrination3.3%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.5%Blaze Media: 7.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 7.2%Dave Urbanski: 3.1%Blaze Media: 2.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…7.2%

512 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers61%attributed speech202writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageMarkell Hitchings • 15 words • 100.0% coverageMarkell Hitchings • 6 words • 0.0% coverageMarkell Hitchings • 19 words • 0.0% coverageMarkell Hitchings • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMarkell Hitchings • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMarkell Hitchings • 10 words • 0.0% coverageMarkell Hitchings • 5 words • 0.0% coverageMarkell Hitchings • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageKSDK • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMarkell Hitchings • 31 words • 0.0% coverageMarkell Hitchings • 21 words • 0.0% coverageMarkell Hitchings • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageMarkell Hitchings • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMarkell Hitchings • 15 words • 0.0% coverageBlaze News • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageMarkell Hitchings • 27 words • 0.0% coverageMarkell Hitchings • 6 words • 0.0% coverageMarkell Hitchings • 5 words • 0.0% coverageMarkell Hitchings • 7 words • 0.0% coverageMarkell Hitchings • 6 words • 0.0% coverageMarkell Hitchings • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageKSDK • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Blaze News

100%flagged-word coverage
14 attributed words4.5% of attributed speech67% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +88.6 ptsWriter: 11.4%Blaze News: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-10.9 ptsWriter: 10.9%Blaze News: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-8.4 ptsWriter: 8.4%Blaze News: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.