MS NOW95%

Markwayne Mullin isn’t interested in spectacle  and that’s dangerous 0%

By Alexander Puri0%

4/10/2026, 2:43:45 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Indoctrination, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 29.1% saturation with 200 hits. Analysis detected 1,908 faulty-reasoning hits from 687 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

In the Dilley Immigration Processing Center, 70 miles south of San Antonio, Texas, a 19-year-old college student remains detained, along with 77 children, in the custody of U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement. 
At the infamous Camp East Montana in Fort Bliss, reports say three migrants (and possibly four) have died, while 100 detainees have contracted measles. 
At the Otay Mesa Detention Center in San Diego, detainees have described being put in cages and going 290 days without eating one piece of fruit. 
Under former Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, ICE had steadily gained a reputation of cruelty, unchecked force and acting with impunity. 
With President Donald Trump’s removal of Noem from the position in March, and his hiring of Oklahoma Sen. 
Markwayne Mullin, the administration seemed to signal a change was coming to the department. 
Where Mullin does differ from Noem, critically, is his awareness of the optics. 
But less than a month into Mullin’s tenure, harmful treatment of people in detention and custody seems to have continued apace. 
Reps. 
Joaquin Castro and Greg Casar, both Democrats from Texas, affirmed this when visiting the Dilley detention center on Wednesday. 
Castro attributed what he witnessed there to Mullin directly, saying during a press conference: “Under Secretary Mullin, DHS has become more secretive, not less, and yet the cruelty remains the same.” 
Castro recounted some of the detainees’ horror stories and the local ICE agents’ refusal to provide information. 
He reiterated his findings in an 11-minute social media video, saying, “Today’s visit was very different from what I’ve gone through before. 
 Washington is literally controlling just about every word that comes out of the mouth of the people who work at Dilley.” 
If Mullin has his way with DHS, such horrific and utterly inhumane conditions will not dominate the front pages of newspapers, your television screen or your social media feed. 
Mullin effectively said as much in his confirmation hearing last month when he stated, “My goal in six months is that we’re not in the lead story every single day.” 
In an interview with Fox News’ Bret Baier earlier this week, he questioned why DHS is “such a political hotbed” when “all they’re doing is trying to keep our streets safe, trying to keep our nation secure.” 
Mullin has stated his support for deporting babies born in the U.S. to parents who entered the country illegally, defended Trump’s deployment of the National Guard in California against the wishes of Gov. 
Gavin Newsom, and labeled the Democrats’ refusal to fund DHS without significant reforms to ICE tactics as “political theater.” 
In an appearance on CNN’s “State of the Union” when he was a senator, Mullin told Jake Tapper that the ICE officer who fatally shot Renee Good acted in self-defense when he fired at her because her car was “a lethal weapon.” 
When Tapper presented images of the officer shooting Good from the side, and thus out of the way of her vehicle, Mullin remained steadfast, asserting that “the vehicle was still acting in the manner of a deadly weapon and until that completely stops, he [the officer] has to eliminate the threat.” 
Therein lies the one sobering and dangerous distinction between how Noem ran DHS and how Mullin intends to. 
Whereas Noem permitted the department to inflict excessive and sometimes fatal harm on camera and in broad daylight, Mullin appears to understand that he can continue to operate similarly  as long as he can keep his department’s offenses out of the public eye. 
And crucially, there’s scant evidence that Mullin’s strategy to keep DHS out of the spotlight involves any true departure from the overtly cruel methods his predecessor oversaw during her time leading the department. 
It’s important to remember that the public outrage and backlash that Noem incurred was arguably what led to her ouster, and what created a record of overwhelming desire for a change. 
As Castro said, “the cruelty remains the same.” 
The public would do well to remain vigilant, even (or especially) if the headlines and viral coverage quiet down. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 29.1%Alexander Puri: 16.3%MS NOW: 7.5%Confirmation Bias29.1%This article: 0.0%Alexander Puri: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.7%Alexander Puri: 3.9%MS NOW: 3.7%Availability Heuristic8.7%This article: 0.0%Alexander Puri: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 4.5%Alexander Puri: 3.4%MS NOW: 1.3%Hindsight Bias4.5%This article: 0.0%Alexander Puri: 3.7%MS NOW: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Alexander Puri: 12.0%MS NOW: 15.4%Framing Effect4.1%This article: 0.0%Alexander Puri: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Puri: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Puri: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Puri: 0.5%MS NOW: 2.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 18.0%Alexander Puri: 8.6%MS NOW: 3.2%Pessimism Bias18.0%This article: 27.7%Alexander Puri: 26.3%MS NOW: 19.2%Negativity Bias27.7%This article: 5.4%Alexander Puri: 6.1%MS NOW: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias5.4%This article: 8.3%Alexander Puri: 5.6%MS NOW: 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error8.3%This article: 6.1%Alexander Puri: 1.5%MS NOW: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias6.1%This article: 5.5%Alexander Puri: 2.8%MS NOW: 3.5%In-Group Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Alexander Puri: 0.7%MS NOW: 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Alexander Puri: 0.8%MS NOW: 2.2%Halo Effect3.3%This article: 0.0%Alexander Puri: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Puri: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.1%Alexander Puri: 1.5%MS NOW: 1.8%Recency Bias3.1%This article: 2.0%Alexander Puri: 0.5%MS NOW: 0.6%Primacy Effect2.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Puri: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Puri: 3.8%MS NOW: 4.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Puri: 2.0%MS NOW: 1.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.9%Alexander Puri: 2.5%MS NOW: 5.4%Appeal to Authority3.9%This article: 2.6%Alexander Puri: 0.7%MS NOW: 2.2%False Dilemma2.6%This article: 14.8%Alexander Puri: 4.8%MS NOW: 2.2%Slippery Slope14.8%This article: 0.0%Alexander Puri: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.4%Alexander Puri: 10.8%MS NOW: 8.1%Hasty Generalization5.4%This article: 0.0%Alexander Puri: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Puri: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 14.3%Alexander Puri: 18.9%MS NOW: 9.8%Appeal to Emotion14.3%This article: 1.9%Alexander Puri: 4.2%MS NOW: 2.4%Begging the Question1.9%This article: 7.6%Alexander Puri: 4.7%MS NOW: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.6%This article: 0.0%Alexander Puri: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.8%Alexander Puri: 3.6%MS NOW: 0.9%Burden of Proof4.8%This article: 0.0%Alexander Puri: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Puri: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 16.2%Alexander Puri: 9.0%MS NOW: 2.6%Anecdotal16.2%This article: 0.0%Alexander Puri: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 15.0%Alexander Puri: 5.6%MS NOW: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)15.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Puri: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Puri: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Puri: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Puri: 1.9%MS NOW: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Puri: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 13.8%Alexander Puri: 5.5%MS NOW: 2.5%Unattributed Quote13.8%This article: 10.6%Alexander Puri: 2.7%MS NOW: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection10.6%This article: 14.3%Alexander Puri: 22.8%MS NOW: 14.2%Biased Writer Voice14.3%This article: 17.9%Alexander Puri: 9.9%MS NOW: 2.1%Indoctrination17.9%This article: 3.3%Alexander Puri: 6.0%MS NOW: 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias3.3%This article: 5.4%Alexander Puri: 3.4%MS NOW: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%Alexander Puri: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

687 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers37%attributed speech435writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageJoaquin Castro • 31 words • 100.0% coverageJoaquin Castro • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJoaquin Castro • 22 words • 100.0% coverageJoaquin Castro • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageMarkwayne Mullin • 30 words • 0.0% coverageMarkwayne Mullin • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageMarkwayne Mullin • 42 words • 100.0% coverageMarkwayne Mullin • 51 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Markwayne Mullin

100%flagged-word coverage
160 attributed words63% of attributed speech95% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Quote-first Misdirection+31.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Markwayne Mullin: 31.9%31.9%Indoctrination-28.3 ptsWriter: 28.3%Markwayne Mullin: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+26.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Markwayne Mullin: 26.3%26.3%Politically Right Leaning +23.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Markwayne Mullin: 23.1%23.1%Biased Writer Voice-22.5 ptsWriter: 22.5%Markwayne Mullin: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-5.3 ptsWriter: 5.3%Markwayne Mullin: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.