Marco Rubio takes action to END the threat from Tim Walz's illegal alien pedophile pardon ⁠72%

By Carlos Garcia⁠64%

7/10/2026, 11:35:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 38.8% saturation with 201 hits. Analysis detected 1,554 faulty-reasoning hits from 518 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 64% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (6,308 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 71.20% of the article peer group.

State Sec. 
Marco Rubio said that the horrific pedophile pardoned by Democratic Minnesota Gov. 
Tim Walz will no longer threaten U.S. citizens after he took action. 
Tou Lue Vang of Laos admitted to committing horrible and disgusting sexual abuse of a 10-year-old in 2005 and accepted a sentence of 30 years probation to avoid prison time, as previously reported by Blaze News. 
'Americans must never be forced by their elected leaders to live alongside foreign sex criminals who have no right to begin with to reside in our country.' 
Vang was allowed to finish probation early, and then a commission that included Walz voted to pardon him in June. 
That would have possibly allowed Vang to stay in the country, until Rubio stepped in. 
"Just days before this foreign sex offender was scheduled to be deported, Tim Walz the governor issued him a pardon, setting him free to once again endanger the children of America," said Rubio in a video on social media. 
He then said he revoked Vang's legal status. 
"As a result, federal agents took him into custody, and as of today, he has been removed from the United States," Rubio added. 
"Because of our actions, this foreign criminal will never pose a threat to any American ever again." 
Far-left Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, who is also on the board of pardons, attempted to justify the pedophile pardon in a statement to KSTP-TV. 
"The Minnesota Board of Pardons made a unanimous decision to grant Tou Vang this pardon after an exhaustive process, which included a statement of support for the pardon from the victim, a recommendation to grant the pardon from the Clemency Review Commission, and a large number of community support letters," he wrote. 
He went on to accuse the Department of Homeland Security of "lying through their teeth" about the pardon shielding Vang from deportation. 
The victim in the case did release a statement supporting the pardon. 
"What happened to me was wrong, but I have had many years to think about this. 
I have made my peace with it. 
I forgive him," she wrote. 
"I want his family to stay together here. 
His children need their father. 
He and his wife have built a life. 
I believe that he has learned and grown since the abuse and that the family has suffered enough." 
RELATED: Illegal alien coach who murdered boy committed sex crimes against 2 underage boys: Cops 
A New York Times report said that the plea deal was offered because the victim had been pressured against testifying by her family members, according to the Ramsey County Attorney’s Office. 
"Americans must never be forced by their elected leaders to live alongside foreign sex criminals who have no right to begin with to reside in our country," Rubio concluded. 
"This administration will always stand with the American people and defend them from violent criminals." 
Like Blaze News? 
Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. 
Sign up here ! 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.6%Carlos Garcia: 4.1%Blaze Media: 5.6%Confirmation Bias10.6%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.7%Blaze Media: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 15.8%Carlos Garcia: 3.4%Blaze Media: 3.2%Availability Heuristic15.8%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.6%Blaze Media: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 5.2%Carlos Garcia: 0.5%Blaze Media: 0.8%Hindsight Bias5.2%This article: 3.3%Carlos Garcia: 1.0%Blaze Media: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias3.3%This article: 24.5%Carlos Garcia: 11.1%Blaze Media: 9.6%Framing Effect24.5%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.5%Blaze Media: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.4%Carlos Garcia: 1.2%Blaze Media: 1.7%Optimism Bias6.4%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.7%Blaze Media: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 38.8%Carlos Garcia: 12.1%Blaze Media: 9.8%Negativity Bias38.8%This article: 2.9%Carlos Garcia: 1.6%Blaze Media: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.2%Blaze Media: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.7%Carlos Garcia: 1.8%Blaze Media: 2.7%In-Group Bias7.7%This article: 4.8%Carlos Garcia: 1.0%Blaze Media: 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.7%Blaze Media: 2.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.1%Blaze Media: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.4%Blaze Media: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Carlos Garcia: 3.4%Blaze Media: 2.6%Ad Hominem4.8%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.8%Blaze Media: 1.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 16.0%Carlos Garcia: 3.6%Blaze Media: 3.7%Appeal to Authority16.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.4%Blaze Media: 2.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.4%Blaze Media: 1.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.8%Carlos Garcia: 5.1%Blaze Media: 8.9%Hasty Generalization9.8%This article: 2.9%Carlos Garcia: 1.6%Blaze Media: 0.8%Red Herring2.9%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.0%Blaze Media: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 27.4%Carlos Garcia: 10.5%Blaze Media: 8.2%Appeal to Emotion27.4%This article: 10.8%Carlos Garcia: 0.9%Blaze Media: 1.5%Begging the Question10.8%This article: 24.3%Carlos Garcia: 2.1%Blaze Media: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)24.3%This article: 4.2%Carlos Garcia: 0.4%Blaze Media: 0.2%Tu Quoque4.2%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.1%Blaze Media: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 2.3%Blaze Media: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 2.1%Blaze Media: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.0%Carlos Garcia: 3.9%Blaze Media: 2.8%Unattributed Quote6.0%This article: 20.1%Carlos Garcia: 3.9%Blaze Media: 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection20.1%This article: 19.5%Carlos Garcia: 6.5%Blaze Media: 10.6%Biased Writer Voice19.5%This article: 24.5%Carlos Garcia: 2.3%Blaze Media: 4.5%Indoctrination24.5%This article: 4.8%Carlos Garcia: 0.9%Blaze Media: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 5.7%Blaze Media: 7.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Carlos Garcia: 3.6%Blaze Media: 2.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.6%

518 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers60%attributed speech207writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 39 words • 100.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 23 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageKeith Ellison • 52 words • 0.0% coverageKeith Ellison • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coveragevictim • 16 words • 0.0% coveragevictim • 7 words • 0.0% coveragevictim • 5 words • 0.0% coveragevictim • 8 words • 0.0% coveragevictim • 5 words • 0.0% coveragevictim • 8 words • 0.0% coveragevictim • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 29 words • 100.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Marco Rubio

95%flagged-word coverage
170 attributed words55% of attributed speech99% writer coverage
0%35.0%70.0%Indoctrination+58.6 ptsWriter: 7.2%Marco Rubio: 65.9%65.9%Quote-first Misdirection+22.6 ptsWriter: 17.4%Marco Rubio: 40.0%40.0%Biased Writer Voice-25.3 ptsWriter: 32.4%Marco Rubio: 7.1%7.1%Unattributed Quote-15.0 ptsWriter: 15.0%Marco Rubio: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-12.1 ptsWriter: 12.1%Marco Rubio: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -11.6 ptsWriter: 11.6%Marco Rubio: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.