Boston man dead after skydiving accident in Orange 7%

By Samantha Genzer10%

7/13/2026, 9:53:22 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Availability Heuristic, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 41.8% saturation with 79 hits. Analysis detected 285 faulty-reasoning hits from 189 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 23.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (20,398 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 93.20% of the article peer group.

A 28-year-old Boston man died after a skydiving accident at Jumptown Skydiving in Orange, Massachusetts on Sunday, authorities said. 
First responders were called to the facility around 4 p.m. for a “serious skydiving accident,” the Northwestern District Attorney’s office said in a press release. 
A preliminary investigation revealed the man fell approximately 30 feet to the ground after a “sudden and unexpected gust of wind interfered with his parachute,” the DA’s office said. 
The man, whose identity has not been released, was taken to Athol Hospital, where he was pronounced dead, authorities said. 
Massachusetts State Police and the Orange Police Department are investigating the accident, and the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner will determine the cause and manner of death, officials said. 
Jumptown Skydiving did not respond to a request for comment Monday afternoon. 
Sunday’s accident marks the second fatality at the facility within the last year. 
Last October, a “midair collision between two experienced skydivers” at Jumptown Skydiving resulted in the death of a 62-year-old Connecticut man, the facility said. 
Orange, Massachusetts is approximately 70 miles west of Boston. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 1.8%Boston.com: 2.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 1.2%Boston.com: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 16.9%Samantha Genzer: 2.0%Boston.com: 3.0%Availability Heuristic16.9%This article: 12.7%Samantha Genzer: 0.8%Boston.com: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic12.7%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.3%Boston.com: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 15.9%Samantha Genzer: 1.3%Boston.com: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias15.9%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 3.4%Boston.com: 5.7%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.9%Boston.com: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.6%Boston.com: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.2%Boston.com: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 2.0%Boston.com: 2.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 1.1%Boston.com: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 4.2%Boston.com: 6.2%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.5%Boston.com: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.4%Boston.com: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.8%Boston.com: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.1%Boston.com: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 1.5%Boston.com: 2.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.9%Samantha Genzer: 1.2%Boston.com: 1.4%Recency Bias6.9%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.2%Boston.com: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.1%Boston.com: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.1%Boston.com: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.1%Boston.com: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 41.8%Samantha Genzer: 2.8%Boston.com: 3.8%Appeal to Authority41.8%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 1.1%Boston.com: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.5%Boston.com: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.9%Samantha Genzer: 1.8%Boston.com: 3.1%Hasty Generalization6.9%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.2%Boston.com: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.4%Boston.com: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 6.8%Boston.com: 6.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.6%Boston.com: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 15.3%Samantha Genzer: 1.1%Boston.com: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)15.3%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.3%Boston.com: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.1%Boston.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.1%Boston.com: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 1.1%Boston.com: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.3%Samantha Genzer: 1.3%Boston.com: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.3%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.1%Boston.com: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.1%Boston.com: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 28.0%Samantha Genzer: 1.3%Boston.com: 1.3%Unattributed Quote28.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.6%Boston.com: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 1.0%Boston.com: 3.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 1.9%Boston.com: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.1%Boston.com: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 0.1%Boston.com: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Samantha Genzer: 1.0%Boston.com: 2.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

189 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers63%attributed speech69writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageNorthwestern District Attorney’s office • 25 words • 0.0% coverageNorthwestern District Attorney’s office • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageMassachusetts State Police • 30 words • 0.0% coverageJumptown Skydiving • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJumptown Skydiving • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jumptown Skydiving

100%flagged-word coverage
36 attributed words30% of attributed speech46% writer coverage
0%35.0%70.0%Unattributed Quote+66.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jumptown Skydiving: 66.7%66.7%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.