How to eat like a Dallas City Council member 11%

By Emma Ruby66%

7/23/2026, 2:02:43 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 182 hits. Analysis detected 372 faulty-reasoning hits from 912 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 27.5% and a BS Rank of 11% (19,613 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 89.60% of the article peer group.

Even though the Dallas City Council is out for the summer, there has been no shortage of stories stemming from City Hall. 
There have been ongoing legal threats surrounding the future of the downtown building. 
No one really knows how next year’s budget will shake out, but cuts are sure to come and be felt across town. 
Furloughs have affected non-uniformed city departments to help cut costs. 
Although morale is reportedly down, the Dallas Morning News reports that a city manager-sponsored pizza party may help cheer things up for some employees soon. 
The council’s summer break also signals the filing of a state-mandated, semi-annual report on how officeholder money is being spent. 
All officeholders in Texas are required to file their reports by July 15, and the document makes public all expenditures and contributions received by an elected official in the first half of the year. 
Now, if you were an especially savvy political journalist, you may look at these reports as a way of seeing who supports what. 
For instance, council member Cara Mendelsohn, who has been outspoken in her support for preserving the city hall building, contributed to the Dallas chapter of the American Institute of Architects in March. 
Those dots connect fairly easily. 
But we are the Observer, which means that semi-annual expense reports mean one thing, and one thing only: it’s time to check in on where the Dallas City Council is eating. 
Council members are allowed to expense their meals when the meal happens as part of that representative’s official duties. 
Taking a community advocate to coffee to learn about an infrastructure project; planning a speech for an upcoming council meeting while inhaling pizzas, or combing over zoning cases with a side of Chinese takeout; that sort of thing. 
Some council members utilize this perk more than others. 
Take the aforementioned Mendelsohn, who may never have stepped into a restaurant before in her life if this report is all we have to go off of. 
At the opposite end of the spectrum is council member Chad West, whose expense report includes a stop at nearly every restaurant in the Bishop Arts District over the past six months. 
Tribal All Day Cafe appears to be his favorite place, as he took meetings with constituents at the health food spot at least four times. 
Like with most things Dallas does, the city’s electronic filing system is a bit glitchy. 
Oftentimes, the report repeats entries, which could make it appear that a council member visited an establishment four or five times when really it was just one. 
To determine individual visits, we are checking for unique transaction dates and charge amounts. 
For some council members, the reports offer a look into who the person behind the horseshoe really is. 
For instance, council member Jesse Moreno is a coffee guy. 
He’s swiped his card at Starbucks, Palmeri Cafe, La Casita Coffee, Killer Joe Neighborhood Cafe, Weekend Coffee and LA 57. 
Most of those charges detail that meetings took place while Moreno got his caffeine fix. 
Anyone who has looked into this particular issue before knows that council member Paula Blackmon has a thing for Bread Zeppelin. 
Who among us doesn’t? 
Blackmon charged her Caesar-stuffed baguette to her officeholder account on at least three occasions since January. 
But Bread Zeppelin may have been dethroned as Blackmon’s go-to spot; Cheba Hut, a cannabis-themed sub shop, was the District 9 lunch spot seven times. 
Council member Laura Cadena is also a repeat visitor of one establishment: Charco Broiler Steak House on Jefferson Boulevard. 
You know the place that I’m talking about, there’s a giant cow on the roof. 
Cadena visited at least three times in the first half of the year. 
(We’ll be reaching out to her office to find out about her order. 
This story is developing.) 
A handful of council members had only one or two food-related charges, and most were spots within that representative’s district (or close to it). 
Council member Adam Bazaldua made a stop at Far Out, while representative Gay Donnell Willis lunched at Henks Deli. 
Council member Jaime Resendez had a charge at Cielito Lindo. 
Six representatives  council members Zarin Gracey, Maxie Johnson, Lori Blair, Kathy Stewart, Bill Roth and Paul Ridley  did not have any expenditures during the filing period. 
That’s a real shame, because we were getting on a roll here. 
That and the whole “accountability” thing too, we suppose. 
That brings us to the head honcho himself. 
Yes, even the mayor is required to file a July 15 expense report. 
Mayor Eric Johnson loves a steakhouse. 
We’re talking Bob’s, Capital Grille, Dakota’s  you name it. 
On at least eight occasions, Johnson took a “meeting with interested parties” at a fine-dining establishment, and the bill typically came out to around $230. 
(One trip to Bob’s topped $300.) 
Who exactly is “interested” in the mayor is unclear, but we’d certainly be interested in a nice steak if he’s footing the bill. 
Correction, 7/24/2026: The original headline of this article noted that taxpayer dollars were used to reimburse City Council members for the expenses filed on July 15. 
Campaign funds are used to reimburse officeholders for those expenses, including meals. 
We've also revised the sentence where we originally wrote that Paula Blackmon charged the meals listed in her expense report "to city hall," to more specifically state that those items were charged to "her officeholder account". 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.5%Emma Ruby: 5.7%Dallas Observer: 4.0%Confirmation Bias0.5%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 4.4%Dallas Observer: 3.3%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 1.1%Emma Ruby: 0.4%Dallas Observer: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic1.1%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.4%Dallas Observer: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 1.5%Dallas Observer: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Emma Ruby: 3.6%Dallas Observer: 7.8%Framing Effect3.4%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 1.0%Dallas Observer: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 7.0%Dallas Observer: 3.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Emma Ruby: 2.4%Dallas Observer: 1.2%Pessimism Bias2.4%This article: 1.6%Emma Ruby: 2.1%Dallas Observer: 3.1%Negativity Bias1.6%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 10.3%Dallas Observer: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Emma Ruby: 0.9%Dallas Observer: 0.7%In-Group Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 3.8%Dallas Observer: 3.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 1.3%Dallas Observer: 0.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 5.3%Dallas Observer: 4.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.5%Emma Ruby: 5.6%Dallas Observer: 3.1%Hasty Generalization6.5%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.3%Emma Ruby: 1.8%Dallas Observer: 0.7%Bandwagon2.3%This article: 0.4%Emma Ruby: 2.5%Dallas Observer: 5.2%Appeal to Emotion0.4%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 1.0%Dallas Observer: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 5.1%Dallas Observer: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 1.3%Dallas Observer: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 5.5%Dallas Observer: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 1.1%Dallas Observer: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 20.0%Emma Ruby: 9.8%Dallas Observer: 7.7%Biased Writer Voice20.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.8%Dallas Observer: 0.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Ruby: 1.0%Dallas Observer: 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

912 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker2.7%attributed speech887writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDallas Morning News • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Dallas Morning News

0%flagged-word coverage
25 attributed words100% of attributed speech28% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Biased Writer Voice-20.5 ptsWriter: 20.5%Dallas Morning News: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.