Newsday30%

At-home Lyme disease tests  for ticks  hitting market this month 22%

By Newsday Studios9% File Footage34%

8/6/2026, 2:14:24 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 2 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 35.3% saturation with 18 hits. Analysis detected 30 faulty-reasoning hits from 51 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 29.4% and a BS Rank of 22% (22,376 of 28,663 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 78.10% of the article peer group.

The test represents the latest effort to combat Lyme, the most common tick-borne disease in the United States. 
NewsdayTV's Ken Buffa spoke with local experts on what you can do to prevent this disease. 
Credit: Newsday Studios; File Footage 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 9.2%Newsday: 1.8%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 35.3%Newsday Studios: 15.3%Newsday: 2.4%Availability Heuristic35.3%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 4.4%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 23.5%Newsday Studios: 2.5%Newsday: 1.1%Optimism Bias23.5%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 1.5%Newsday: 8.4%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 1.5%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 3.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 2.9%Newsday: 1.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 3.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 6.3%Newsday: 1.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 1.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 2.4%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Newsday Studios: 0.0%Newsday: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

51 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.