Man, 29, killed in daytime shooting in Dorchester 4%

By Audrey Cooney3%

7/15/2026, 12:04:36 AM

Keywords: Crime

BS Summary: This article contains 5 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 27.6% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 135 faulty-reasoning hits from 145 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 16.4% and a BS Rank of 4% (21,194 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 96.80% of the article peer group.

A man was shot and killed Wednesday morning in Dorchester, police said. 
Officers were called to 15 York St. shortly before noon on Wednesday, the Boston Police Department said in an announcement. 
Police found a man with a gunshot wound; Boston EMS responded and declared the man dead at the scene, the department said. 
Officials had not publicly identified the man killed as of Wednesday night. 
A spokesperson for the office of Suffolk County District Attorney Kevin Hayden said the victim was a 29-year-old man, but said they had no further information to release. 
Authorities have not announced an arrest in the killing. 
Police asked anyone with information about the shooting to contract the Boston Police CrimeStoppers Program by calling 1-800-494-TIPS, by texting the word “TIP” to CRIME (27463), or by visiting the Boston Police CrimeStoppers website. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 2.7%Boston.com: 2.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.9%Boston.com: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.3%Audrey Cooney: 0.7%Boston.com: 3.0%Availability Heuristic8.3%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 4.0%Boston.com: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 4.4%Boston.com: 5.7%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 1.3%Boston.com: 2.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 14.5%Audrey Cooney: 6.8%Boston.com: 6.2%Negativity Bias14.5%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 1.0%Boston.com: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 2.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 19.3%Audrey Cooney: 1.9%Boston.com: 3.8%Appeal to Authority19.3%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.6%Boston.com: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 2.3%Boston.com: 3.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 3.1%Boston.com: 6.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.9%Boston.com: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.9%Boston.com: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 27.6%Audrey Cooney: 3.1%Boston.com: 1.3%Unattributed Quote27.6%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 1.6%Boston.com: 3.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 2.0%Boston.com: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Audrey Cooney: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 23.4%Audrey Cooney: 1.1%Boston.com: 2.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…23.4%

145 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers72%attributed speech41writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageBoston Police Department • 20 words • 0.0% coverageBoston EMS • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Hayden • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageBoston Police CrimeStoppers Program • 34 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Kevin Hayden

100%flagged-word coverage
28 attributed words27% of attributed speech80% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+70.7 ptsWriter: 29.3%Kevin Hayden: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.