STLPR0%

One in four Missourians report barriers to preferred birth control, survey finds 23%

By Sarah Fentem57%

5/6/2026, 3:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 3 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 62 hits. Analysis detected 137 faulty-reasoning hits from 378 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 36.2% and a BS Rank of 23% (16,918 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 77.30% of the article peer group.

One in four Missourians say they've run into obstacles obtaining birth control, according to a new survey of about 1,000 people from the Missouri Foundation for Health. 
The survey of Missourians ages 18 to 35 found widespread support for birth control, with 85% of those polled in favor of “access to all methods.” 
But about one-third said they worried about being able to access birth control to prevent pregnancy in the future. 
The poll was commissioned through the Missouri Foundation for Health's Right Time Initiative, which advocates for “quality reproductive health education and services” for the state's residents. 
“We know that birth control is utilized by the majority of people at some point in time in their life, and that, you know, the poll reflects what we already know to be true: that the majority of Missourians believe in access to birth control,” said Michelle Trupiano, executive director of the Beacon Reproductive Health Network, which leads the Right Time initiative. 
She said the poll suggests Missourians “want their elected officials to do more to support access and to make [birth control] more accessible.” 
Beacon is the new name of the Missouri Family Health Council, an organization that for years has distributed millions of dollars in federal funding for birth control made available through Title X. 
The Title X program has made birth control and family planning services available through public and nonprofit agencies since 1970. 
The organization's $8 million annual budget supports birth control and family planning programs at dozens of clinics in Missouri and Oklahoma, Trupiano said. 
About one in four respondents to the Right Time survey said cost and insurance have made accessing birth control of their choice difficult. 
“Definitely lack of a nearby clinic has been a barrier,” she said. 
“A lack of transportation, the cost or insurance, wait times and lack of time to get to a clinic are all barriers that people experience throughout the state." 
Trupiano said she supports a bill before the Missouri legislature that would allow patients to receive a year's worth of birth control at once. 
The birth control in the poll refers to hormonal methods such as IUDs, pills and patches, as well as emergency contraception. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.4%Sarah Fentem: 1.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias16.4%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 3.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 6.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 4.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 1.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 6.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 2.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 1.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 4.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 13.5%Sarah Fentem: 3.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization13.5%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 6.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 3.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 3.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 6.3%Sarah Fentem: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias6.3%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

378 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker46%attributed speech206writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageMichelle Trupiano • 62 words • 0.0% coverageMichelle Trupiano • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageMichelle Trupiano • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageMichelle Trupiano • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMichelle Trupiano • 28 words • 0.0% coverageMichelle Trupiano • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Michelle Trupiano

80%flagged-word coverage
172 attributed words100% of attributed speech0% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Politically Left Leaning B+14.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Michelle Trupiano: 14.0%14.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.