Spencer Pratt suffers an enormous blow in LA mayor's race against woke rival Nithya Raman in fight to take on Karen Bass 52%

By STEPHEN M. LEPORE0%

6/8/2026, 12:11:36 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 23.6% saturation with 230 hits. Analysis detected 2,159 faulty-reasoning hits from 975 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 51.2% and a BS Rank of 52% (10,602 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 51.60% of the article peer group.

Spencer Pratt suffers an enormous blow in LA mayor's race against woke rival Nithya Raman in fight to take on Karen Bass 
By STEPHEN M. 
LEPORE, US SENIOR REPORTER 
Published: 20:11 EDT, 7 June 2026 | Updated: 22:39 EDT, 7 June 2026 
Spencer Pratt fell to third place in the Los Angeles mayoral primary election as socialist candidate Nithya Raman surged into second. 
The Hills star had seen his lead on Raman shrink over the weekend in his quest to face incumbent Karen Bass for a runoff in November. 
Donald Trump has already alleged election fraud. 
As of Sunday night's ballot drop in California, Raman has now overtaken Pratt for second place by 3,000 votes. 
Pratt expressed his frustrations with the lengthy vote count process in a social media post earlier on Sunday. 
'Remember everyone…we are still in the lead, and we've got allllllll the way til July 6th to keep counting,' he wrote, captioning a photo of Raman crying on election night. 
'They're not the only ones who know where to find votes.' 
He then suggested the number of votes added to Raman's tally since Tuesday matched the number of homeless people in LA. 
'"A net swing of more than 43,000 votes since Tuesday.." 43,000, huh?' 
Pratt mused. 
'Where have I seen that number before...? 
Probably nothing,' he wrote, quoting an article that said there were 43,699 people who experience homelessness in LA. 
Spencer Pratt fell to third place in the Los Angeles mayoral primary election as socialist candidate Nithya Raman surged into second 
As of Sunday night's ballot drop in California, Raman (pictured) has now overtaken Pratt for second place by 3,000 votes and is now favored to win 
Bass retains her lead over the two challengers with 34.7 percent after 83 percent of the ballots were counted. 
Raman is now in second place with 27.1 percent of the vote, with Pratt trailing in third with 26.7 percent. 
Bass made clear she had already turned her attention on her probable new opponent, the socialist Raman. 
'We look forward to winning a contest against an opponent who allows encampments near schools and fights against hiring more cops, yet is MIA on saving Hollywood jobs and fighting back when ICE invades LA,' a campaign spokesperson for Bass said. 
The Department of Justice has sent one of its attorneys to the city to observe the ballot counting process, as Trump has claimed fraud as two races have yet to be called. 
Since Election Day, Trump has claimed that the Democrats are cheating as the count has continued. 
'Watch California, everybody!' 
the President posted to Truth Social Thursday night. 
'Our Election process is as bad, or worse, than any Third World Country. 
The biggest difference is, they count their Votes much faster - They don't wait seven days to tell you who won, rigging the Election during each and every one of them.' 
'Americans are ashamed of what is happening!' 
Trump added. 
Trump brought up the long waits again during his Friday trip to Wisconsin, a speech predominantly billed as a message to the state's farmers. 
'Can you imagine, it's four days, and they still aren't even close to telling you who won. 
You know why? 
Because they're rigging the election, that's why,' the President claimed. 
Pratt has pledged to combat the city's sprawling homeless encampments, while blaming Bass for allowing them to proliferate. 
Like Trump, he has presented himself as a candidate who will topple bureaucracy and make real change in the city. 
Pratt has pledged to combat the city's sprawling homeless encampments, while blaming Bass for allowing them to proliferate 
The tedious process of counting all of California's mail-in ballots has left the fate of Republicans Pratt and Steve Hilton hanging in the balance. 
Assistant U.S. 
Attorney Robert Renner was spotted Friday walking through LA County's central processing center, according to footage from Fox News, alongside a member of Democratic California Attorney General Rob Bonta's team. 
'My office has a presence on the ground right now, is monitoring the situation closely, and stands ready to protect voters and ensure California's election laws are followed,' Bonta posted to X, sharing a story about the feds being on hand. 
Bass will advance to a November runoff, but with so many ballots left outstanding, it remains unclear whether Pratt or progressive city council member Nithya Raman will be her opponent. 
Because of California's large Democratic population - and the fact that more left-leaning voters appeared to vote by mail and vote by mail later in the election process - the race is still expected to be a nail-biter for Hilton. 
Mail-in ballots can be counted as long as they were dropped off by 8pm on Election Day. 
Additionally, California has a history of taking days to count all those ballots. 
The press office for California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, who is term-limited and thus cannot run for reelection, mused on X Thursday: 'Why do Republicans hate that California counts every vote?' 
Hilton has grumbled at the slow pace of the count, calling the process a 'global laughing stock' by pointing out that India can tally up 600 million ballots in one day. 
'We're as confident as ever that we will make the top two,' he said in an X post Thursday night. 
Pratt has reacted to the wait by posting 'God always wins' Thursday afternoon. 
His wife, reality TV star Heidi Montag, wrote: 'Never give up, never surrender!' 
on Friday morning, though it was not entirely clear if she was referring to the LA mayoral election. 
Montag has not explicitly backed her husband's campaign on social media, instead writing cryptic posts and advertising her new music. 
The day before, she had posted simply, 'Croissants are magic.' 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.1%Stephen M. Lepore: 3.6%Daily Mail: 2.7%Confirmation Bias9.1%This article: 3.1%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.7%Anchoring Bias3.1%This article: 9.1%Stephen M. Lepore: 2.8%Daily Mail: 2.8%Availability Heuristic9.1%This article: 6.2%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.7%Daily Mail: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic6.2%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.4%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Stephen M. Lepore: 2.0%Daily Mail: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias2.1%This article: 10.6%Stephen M. Lepore: 9.4%Daily Mail: 6.9%Framing Effect10.6%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.8%Stephen M. Lepore: 2.1%Daily Mail: 2.1%Optimism Bias7.8%This article: 1.7%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.0%Daily Mail: 1.1%Pessimism Bias1.7%This article: 22.9%Stephen M. Lepore: 13.2%Daily Mail: 10.9%Negativity Bias22.9%This article: 3.7%Stephen M. Lepore: 2.5%Daily Mail: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.2%Daily Mail: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.4%Stephen M. Lepore: 2.4%Daily Mail: 1.0%In-Group Bias7.4%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.7%Daily Mail: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.4%Daily Mail: 5.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.8%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.3%Daily Mail: 1.7%Recency Bias7.8%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Stephen M. Lepore: 3.2%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem4.2%This article: 4.2%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.7%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man4.2%This article: 11.2%Stephen M. Lepore: 3.2%Daily Mail: 3.0%Appeal to Authority11.2%This article: 5.8%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.9%Daily Mail: 0.9%False Dilemma5.8%This article: 3.2%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.8%Daily Mail: 0.4%Slippery Slope3.2%This article: 1.8%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning1.8%This article: 15.2%Stephen M. Lepore: 4.4%Daily Mail: 3.9%Hasty Generalization15.2%This article: 3.1%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.4%Red Herring3.1%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 23.6%Stephen M. Lepore: 7.1%Daily Mail: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion23.6%This article: 2.5%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.1%Daily Mail: 0.5%Begging the Question2.5%This article: 10.1%Stephen M. Lepore: 3.8%Daily Mail: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.1%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 5.1%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.4%Burden of Proof5.1%This article: 2.7%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature2.7%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.3%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.5%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal2.3%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.8%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.1%Daily Mail: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.8%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.7%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.8%Daily Mail: 3.3%Unattributed Quote0.7%This article: 3.4%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.9%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection3.4%This article: 7.2%Stephen M. Lepore: 6.0%Daily Mail: 8.9%Biased Writer Voice7.2%This article: 4.2%Stephen M. Lepore: 1.2%Daily Mail: 1.0%Indoctrination4.2%This article: 11.6%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.7%Daily Mail: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias11.6%This article: 4.2%Stephen M. Lepore: 2.6%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias4.2%This article: 2.1%Stephen M. Lepore: 0.4%Daily Mail: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.1%

975 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers31%attributed speech676writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 30 words • 100.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 11 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 21 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 7 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageDepartment of Justice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 31 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 17 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 3 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageRob Bonta • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Hilton • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageHeidi Montag • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageHeidi Montag • 10 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Spencer Pratt

100%flagged-word coverage
99 attributed words33% of attributed speech78% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Quote-first Misdirection+30.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Spencer Pratt: 30.3%30.3%Politically Left Leaning B-16.7 ptsWriter: 16.7%Spencer Pratt: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-10.4 ptsWriter: 10.4%Spencer Pratt: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-6.1 ptsWriter: 6.1%Spencer Pratt: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -6.1 ptsWriter: 6.1%Spencer Pratt: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.0 ptsWriter: 3.0%Spencer Pratt: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-1.0 ptsWriter: 1.0%Spencer Pratt: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.