Spencer Pratt praised for 'brilliant' ad highlighting filth on LA's dirty streets 56%

By Melissa Koenig0%

5/25/2026, 2:47:29 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 0 faulty reasoning types, including no named faulty reasoning patterns yet, with no single egregious example has been isolated yet. Analysis detected 0 faulty-reasoning hits from 929 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 53.6% and a BS Rank of 56% (9,629 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 56.00% of the article peer group.

Los Angeles mayoral candidate Spencer Pratt has been praised for his new ad highlighting just how filthy the city's streets really are. 
The former reality television star, 42, posted the video to his X account on Sunday, showing him donning a hazmat suit as he power-washed a sidewalk in the city of Angels. 
It started off showing a cleared-off black top with stenciled writing, reading: 'Imagine if the streets were this clean. 
Spencer Pratt for mayor of LA.' 
The camera then panned to show a woman sweeping the sidewalk, telling how current Mayor Karen Bass 'sent her little goons after me' because she was an activist and expressing her support for Pratt. 
'Spencer Pratt actually listens to the people trying to clean LA,' a text overlay read. 
'For the first time in years, LA citizens finally feel heard.' 
'We're tired of leadership that ignores the problem. 
We're tired of a corrupt mayor bringing our city down,' it continued. 
'LA residents are doing the work City Hall refused to do.' 
As of Sunday evening, the video had been viewed more than 437,000 times, with X users from across the country praising Pratt for the ad. 
'Already pressure washing the streets and he's not even mayor yet,' one woman posted, while another called it 'brilliant advertising.' 
'One of the most ingenious and cutting-edge political campaigns ever. 
Pratt is shaping the future of messaging for decades to come,' a third X user agreed. 
Others agreed that Los Angeles' streets have to be cleaned up. 
'You got that right - I've visited LA from the Midwest three times over the past decade and each time it felt more unclean and more unsafe,' an X user wrote. 
'I hope you win, you have a great vision! 
From the bottom up, I hope the next time we visit will be better than ever!' 
An LA native also shared that: 'Growing up in Santa Monica in the '80s/'90s was the best childhood ever. 
'Liberal policies destroyed my beautiful hometown, and it's the reason I joined the military and never looked back.' 
'It's funny how everyone attacks your name, but never your policies,' he added. 
Some also suggested other politicians around the country should follow Pratt's lead. 
'I love that you're doing this, and I hope that it spills over into other liberal cities that have done such a terrible job, like Portland,' one netizen shared. 
'America is slowly healing, and when LA and NY is back [sic], the rest will follow,' another added. 
Pratt is facing off against incumbent Karen Bass and fellow mayoral hopeful LA Councilmember Nithya Raman in the race. 
A primary is scheduled for June 2, with Bass considered the favorite to win. 
But current polling indicates the race may go to a November 3 runoff as none of the candidates have an outright majority. 
As Pratt now tries to separate himself from his opponents, he has focused his campaign on the high levels of drug use and rampant homelessness in Los Angeles. 
He has vowed to impose a three–week 'grace period' to warn criminals, drug users and homeless people to leave the west coast city. 
Pratt's policies have since earned him the recognition of former Trump advisor Steve Bannon, who said the former TV star is 'probably the most Trumpian candidate we've ever seen in terms of house style.' 
'Trump's superpower was bringing in people into politics who hate politics, and that's what [Pratt] is doing online right now,' Bannon, 72, told NPR. 
President Donald Trump has also said he would 'like to see him do well,' and Naughty But Nice Substacker Rob Shuter has reported that Trump has even considered endorsing Pratt. 
'Shuter also reported that Pratt was trying to walk a fine line - attract conservative voters but not get too tied up in national politics. 
He even claimed on Saturday not to be affiliated with any political party. 
'Everyone is trying to claim me for their tribe,' the mayoral hopeful posted on Saturday. 
'There’s no R next to my name, there’s no D next to my name. 
'I’m not part of a political party, because I hate politicians. 
'I’m just Spencer, husband to Heidi, father to Ryker and Gunner, and I’m a pissed off Angeleno who loves my city and is fed up with what corrupt politicians have done to her.' 
Yet Pratt's post came just two days after he gave a CNN interview in which he revealed that he had been convinced to register as a Republican because of the party's full embrace of gun rights. 
Since 2020, Pratt has been registered as a Republican but he is running as an independent community advocate. 
In the Thursday CNN chat, he said: 'You want to break some news here?' 
Pratt said, pitching what he was about to say as something he's never publicly shared before. 
'When I was a hated reality star, I got so many death threats. 
I had so much security and police. 
And what did they tell me to do? 
'Get a gun,' Pratt recalled. 
'This is real. 
I know people don't like guns, but LA is dangerous if you're hated. 
So, I got a gun. 
My wife got a gun.' 
He then explained that he and his wife, Heidi Montag, needed concealed carry permits because in California, citizens are generally not allowed to open carry firearms, whether they are loaded or unloaded. 
And because Republicans in California are far more supportive of concealed carry than Democrats, Pratt chose to register with the GOP. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 4.1%Daily Mail: 2.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 1.0%Daily Mail: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 3.5%Daily Mail: 2.8%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 1.2%Daily Mail: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 1.0%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 0.9%Daily Mail: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 7.3%Daily Mail: 6.9%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 0.7%Daily Mail: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 1.3%Daily Mail: 2.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 1.1%Daily Mail: 1.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 14.9%Daily Mail: 10.9%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 1.6%Daily Mail: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 0.4%Daily Mail: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 0.6%Daily Mail: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 2.0%Daily Mail: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 1.6%Daily Mail: 5.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 1.9%Daily Mail: 1.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 5.2%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 1.1%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 4.1%Daily Mail: 3.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 1.2%Daily Mail: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 0.9%Daily Mail: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 6.0%Daily Mail: 3.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 1.3%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 9.5%Daily Mail: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 1.0%Daily Mail: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 3.6%Daily Mail: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 0.8%Daily Mail: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 2.1%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 1.2%Daily Mail: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 2.8%Daily Mail: 3.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 3.2%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 6.7%Daily Mail: 8.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 2.3%Daily Mail: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 2.2%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Koenig: 0.1%Daily Mail: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

929 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers20%attributed speech739writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Bannon • 34 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Bannon • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 15 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 14 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 11 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 13 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 7 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 8 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 5 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 3 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 13 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 5 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Spencer Pratt

0%flagged-word coverage
132 attributed words69% of attributed speech0% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.