Gothamist76%

80-year-old man found dead in East River near Long Island City, NYPD says 1%

By Michael Sol Warren74%

5/20/2026, 11:40:32 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 1 faulty reasoning type, including Optimism Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 13 hits. Analysis detected 13 faulty-reasoning hits from 116 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 1% (21,036 of 21,198 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the article peer group.

An 80-year-old man was found dead in the East River near Long Island City on Tuesday afternoon, police said. 
The man was reported floating in the water near 44th Drive and Vernon Boulevard around 4:45 p.m, according to the NYPD. 
Responding officers removed the man from the water, and he was pronounced dead at the scene. 
Police have not yet released the man’s identity. 
City medical examiners are determining his cause of death. 
The NYPD said it has not made any arrests in the case and the investigation remains ongoing. 
This story is based on preliminary information from police and may be updated. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 2.9%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 2.1%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 3.5%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 8.3%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.9%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 11.2%Michael Sol Warren: 3.9%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias11.2%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 2.9%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 10.3%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 2.4%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 2.3%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.3%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.5%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 4.3%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.6%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.2%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 2.8%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.2%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 7.7%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.9%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 2.2%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 4.1%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.4%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.7%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.3%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

116 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker44%attributed speech65writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
NYPD • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageNYPD • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageNYPD • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

NYPD

0%flagged-word coverage
51 attributed words100% of attributed speech20% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.