Iran threatens Bab al-Mandeb closure: How would that affect world trade? 0%

By Priyanka Shankar24% Charu Sudan Kasturi0%

4/6/2026, 4:49:04 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Pessimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 182 hits. Analysis detected 2,019 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,139 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

A top adviser to Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei has threatened that Iranian allies could shut the Bab al-Mandeb shipping route as Tehran has effectively done with the Strait of Hormuz. 
The Bab-al-Mandeb connects the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden and is a crucial waterway for global oil trade. 
Its importance has increased since Iran’s effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz  through which 20 percent of the world’s oil and gas is shipped in peacetime. 
Yemeni fishermen pass by a commercial ship at the strategic Bab el-Mandeb Strait, Yemen, on April 5, 2026 [File: Abdulnasser Alseddik/AP] 
Ali Akbar Velayati, a former Iranian foreign minister and veteran diplomat known for his influence within the establishment, warned on Sunday on X that “the unified command of the Resistance front views Bab al-Mandeb as it does Hormuz”. 
“If the White House dares to repeat its foolish mistakes, it will soon realize that the flow of global energy and trade can be disrupted with a single move,” Velayati wrote. 
Iran’s state-owned Press TV subsequently confirmed his warning. 
It follows US President Donald Trump’s threats to bomb Iran’s power plants and bridges from Wednesday this week if Tehran does not agree to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. 
Iran has said that Hormuz is open to ships from countries that negotiate safe passage  apart from the US and Israel. 
Trump has previously threatened to bomb Iran’s desalination plants. 
But if Bab al-Mandeb were closed, it would impact more than the ongoing war  it could compound the global energy supply crisis sparked by the conflict, deepening the economic turmoil being felt in factories, kitchens and at petrol stations around the world. 
<h2>Where is the Bab al-Mandeb? 
</h2> 
The strait is between Yemen to its northeast and Djibouti and Eritrea in the Horn of Africa to the southwest. 
It connects the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden, which then extends into the Indian Ocean. 
It is 29km (18 miles) wide at its narrowest point, limiting traffic to two channels for inbound and outbound shipments and is effectively controlled by the Iran-backed Houthis. 
The Yemen-based group is a central part of Iran’s so-called “Axis of Resistance”  a coalition of groups ideologically or tactically aligned with Tehran which Velayati appears to have been referring to in his Sunday post on X. 
<h2>Why is the Bab al-Mandeb important for the energy trade? 
</h2> 
It is one of the world’s most important shipping routes. 
The strait is a vital route through which Saudi Arabia sends its oil to Asia. 
When the Strait of Hormuz is open, it is also a crucial passageway for Gulf states besides Saudi Arabia to export their crude oil, gas and other fuel to Europe via the Suez Canal or the Sumed (Suez-Mediterranean) Pipeline on Egypt’s Red Sea coast. 
In 2024, about 4.1 billion barrels of crude oil and refined petroleum products passed through the strait  that’s 5 percent of the global total. 
If Bab al-Mandeb and the Strait of Hormuz were both shut, that would block 25 percent  or a quarter of the world’s oil and gas supply. 
It’s not just oil: About 10 percent of global trade sails through the Bab al-Mandeb, including containers shipped from China, India and other Asian countries to Europe. 
With the Strait of Hormuz shut, Bab al-Mandeb’s importance has only grown. 
Saudi Arabia, which has traditionally also relied principally on the Hormuz strait to export its oil, has increasingly turned to its Red Sea port of Yanbu to ship crude out through the Bab al-Mandeb. 
For this, it has turned to the East West Pipeline, running from the Abqaiq oil processing centre close to the Gulf to Yanbu. 
The 1,200km (745-mile) pipeline is operated by Saudi oil giant Aramco. 
Where the East West Pipeline transferred an average of 770,000 bpd to the Red Sea coast in January and February, according to energy intelligence firm Kpler, Saudi Arabia cranked up its use in March, when Hormuz was shut. 
By the end of March, oil was flowing at the pipeline’s capacity of 7 million bpd  more than ever before. 
A Yemeni soldier stands guards in front of a commercial ship, ‘Al-Nuba’, which is docked for maintenance, on the coast near the strategic Bab el-Mandeb Strait, Yemen,on April 5, 2026 [File: Abdulnasser Alseddik/AP] 
<h2>How could Iran and its allies shut it? 
</h2> 
The Houthis have already shown they can do it. 
During Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza, they blocked the Bab al-Mandeb for what they described as ships associated with Israel or the US. 
Because of frequent attacks on shipping, insurers refused to offer reducing traffic. 
In May 2025, the US and the Houthis agreed to a ceasefire and the Yemeni group has since opened up the Bab al-Mandeb again. 
Recent days have shown how easy it would be for the Houthis to repeat the disruption during the war on Gaza. 
Since late March, the Houthis have fired missiles and drones at Israel, pointing to their effective entry into the war  for now, against Israel, not the US. 
But Nabeel Khoury, a former US diplomat, told Al Jazeera that the missile attacks launched by the Houthis against Israel amounted to “token participation, not full participation”. 
“They have fired a couple of missiles as a warning because of all the talk of potential escalation. 
There are US troops on their way to the region. 
There’s been talk that if there is no agreement, there might be a full-scale attack on Iran as has not been seen so far,” the former deputy chief of mission in Yemen told Al Jazeera. 
If the Houthis truly wanted to enter the war, their weapon would be the blockage of the Bab al-Mandeb. 
“All they have to do is fire at a couple of ships coming through, and that would lead to the arrest of all commercial shipping through the Red Sea,” he said. 
“That would be a red line, and then you would see attacks against Yemen [from the US and Israel] very quickly.” 
<h2>What would a closure of the Bab al-Mandeb mean for the world? 
</h2> 
Elisabeth Kendall, a Middle East specialist and the president of Girton College at Cambridge University, told Al Jazeera that if the Red Sea strait is blocked, it would create a “nightmare scenario”. 
“Because if you have restrictions on the Strait of Hormuz at the same time as restrictions are escalating in the Bab al-Mandeb, then you really will disrupt, if not cripple, trade toward Europe. 
So this is a knife edge, really, depending on what happens next,” she told Al Jazeera. 
Kendall, however, said that while this was a “sweet spot” for the Houthis, the Yemeni group might not want to “provoke a Saudi or indeed a broader response.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.4%Priyanka Shankar: 1.5%Al Jazeera: 2.7%Confirmation Bias5.4%This article: 2.4%Priyanka Shankar: 0.7%Al Jazeera: 0.8%Anchoring Bias2.4%This article: 9.8%Priyanka Shankar: 1.7%Al Jazeera: 2.8%Availability Heuristic9.8%This article: 2.5%Priyanka Shankar: 0.6%Al Jazeera: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic2.5%This article: 3.5%Priyanka Shankar: 0.5%Al Jazeera: 0.4%Hindsight Bias3.5%This article: 7.1%Priyanka Shankar: 1.1%Al Jazeera: 2.1%Overconfidence Bias7.1%This article: 2.4%Priyanka Shankar: 5.5%Al Jazeera: 8.5%Framing Effect2.4%This article: 3.8%Priyanka Shankar: 0.2%Al Jazeera: 0.6%Loss Aversion3.8%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 0.2%Al Jazeera: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 0.0%Al Jazeera: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 1.9%Al Jazeera: 2.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 13.7%Priyanka Shankar: 1.4%Al Jazeera: 2.7%Pessimism Bias13.7%This article: 13.2%Priyanka Shankar: 6.7%Al Jazeera: 10.3%Negativity Bias13.2%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 1.2%Al Jazeera: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 0.8%Al Jazeera: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 0.1%Al Jazeera: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Priyanka Shankar: 1.0%Al Jazeera: 1.5%In-Group Bias4.5%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 0.8%Al Jazeera: 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Priyanka Shankar: 0.7%Al Jazeera: 1.0%Halo Effect3.3%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 0.1%Al Jazeera: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 0.0%Al Jazeera: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.5%Priyanka Shankar: 1.3%Al Jazeera: 1.8%Recency Bias4.5%This article: 3.3%Priyanka Shankar: 0.2%Al Jazeera: 0.3%Primacy Effect3.3%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 0.0%Al Jazeera: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 0.4%Al Jazeera: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 0.1%Al Jazeera: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.2%Priyanka Shankar: 3.3%Al Jazeera: 4.0%Appeal to Authority9.2%This article: 12.0%Priyanka Shankar: 1.6%Al Jazeera: 1.9%False Dilemma12.0%This article: 14.3%Priyanka Shankar: 0.9%Al Jazeera: 1.0%Slippery Slope14.3%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 0.1%Al Jazeera: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.4%Priyanka Shankar: 2.3%Al Jazeera: 3.6%Hasty Generalization5.4%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 0.0%Al Jazeera: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 0.1%Al Jazeera: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 11.3%Priyanka Shankar: 3.7%Al Jazeera: 5.1%Appeal to Emotion11.3%This article: 4.9%Priyanka Shankar: 0.5%Al Jazeera: 0.9%Begging the Question4.9%This article: 16.0%Priyanka Shankar: 3.0%Al Jazeera: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)16.0%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 0.3%Al Jazeera: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 0.3%Al Jazeera: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 0.1%Al Jazeera: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.4%Priyanka Shankar: 0.1%Al Jazeera: 0.2%Composition/Division2.4%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 0.4%Al Jazeera: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 2.5%Priyanka Shankar: 0.1%Al Jazeera: 0.1%No True Scotsman2.5%This article: 9.2%Priyanka Shankar: 1.9%Al Jazeera: 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.2%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 0.0%Al Jazeera: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 0.1%Al Jazeera: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 0.0%Al Jazeera: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 0.2%Al Jazeera: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 0.0%Al Jazeera: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 1.8%Al Jazeera: 2.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 3.3%Priyanka Shankar: 0.9%Al Jazeera: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection3.3%This article: 7.4%Priyanka Shankar: 2.2%Al Jazeera: 4.2%Biased Writer Voice7.4%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 0.3%Al Jazeera: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 0.6%Al Jazeera: 1.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 0.1%Al Jazeera: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Priyanka Shankar: 0.3%Al Jazeera: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1139 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers30%attributed speech792writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageAli Akbar Velayati • 38 words • 100.0% coverageAli Akbar Velayati • 31 words • 0.0% coveragePress TV • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageNabeel Khoury • 27 words • 100.0% coverageNabeel Khoury • 18 words • 0.0% coverageNabeel Khoury • 10 words • 0.0% coverageNabeel Khoury • 35 words • 0.0% coverageNabeel Khoury • 19 words • 0.0% coverageNabeel Khoury • 31 words • 0.0% coverageNabeel Khoury • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageElisabeth Kendall • 32 words • 0.0% coverageElisabeth Kendall • 33 words • 0.0% coverageElisabeth Kendall • 16 words • 0.0% coverageElisabeth Kendall • 28 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Elisabeth Kendall

100%flagged-word coverage
109 attributed words31% of attributed speech59% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Biased Writer Voice-6.2 ptsWriter: 6.2%Elisabeth Kendall: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.