Teen killed in North Center e-scooter crash remembered as a 'goofy' boy who was 'always there for everybody' 4%

By Violet Miller13%

8/5/2026, 6:42:56 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Recency Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 137 faulty-reasoning hits from 552 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 12.4% and a BS Rank of 4% (27,324 of 28,461 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 96.00% of the article peer group.

Alex Blacio was everyone's "rock." 
He was a steady presence in his family, according to his relatives. 
The teen played volleyball through middle and high school  becoming the captain of the varsity volleyball team at Lake View High School last year, where he was happy to play wherever he was needed  and would often meet up with his middle school friends to play at open gyms. 
Monday, the 16-year-old was riding an e-scooter northbound in the 4100 block of North Western Avenue around 3:35 p.m. when he lost control and was hit by a tractor-trailer, Chicago police said in a statement. 
He was taken to Illinois Masonic Hospital, where he was pronounced dead, police said. 
It was his third day at his first job, and though he hadn't been scheduled for work, he was eager to pick up another shift to help out his family, according to his older sister, Andrea Blacio. 
"He showed so much love, he was always there for everybody," she said. 
"He was such a goofy boy and that's how we'll always remember him." 
Maria Mizhuiri sobs when addressing the dozens of family, friends, and community members attending a vigil for her 16-year-old son Alex Blacio, inside his aunt’s home on Wednesday. 
Tyler Pasciak LaRiviere/Sun-Times 
Wednesday night, dozens of loved ones and community members packed into the living room of the boy's aunt's house in the Hermosa neighborhood to pray, sing and remember his life. 
A table with photos of the teen and bouquets of flowers sat at the front of the room where his parents addressed the group. 
"He was my everything," his mother told the group, through tears, in Spanish. 
"I love you." 
"It's not something anybody is gonna get over," his older sister said later. 
"We lost our sibling, and my parents lost our kid. ... 
But seeing that he touched so many hearts is helping us." 
A GoFundMe has been started for Alex Blacio’s family after his fatal e-scooter crash. 
Scooter-related crashes have increased alongside a rise in ridership over the past few years, prompting a safety campaign from the city. 
The Chicago Fire Department responded to nearly 200 e-scooter-related incidents in 2022. 
That number had more than tripled by 2025 . 
Hours before the vigil, a minor was also critically injured after being hit by a truck while riding an e-bike in suburban Crystal Lake, requiring a helicopter transport for "life-threatening injuries," according to Crystal Lake officials. 
Even so, e-scooters have grown increasingly popular among students of Lane Tech College Prep , less than a mile south of where the crash occurred. 
So far this year, two other teens have been fatally struck by drivers while riding e-scooters in the city: 17-year-old Astrid Alexandra Carrillo Noguera and 15-year-old Violet Harris were both killed in accidents on the South Side nearly a month apart this spring. 
Six people on scooters or bikes were hit and killed by cars between January and June of this year, compared to one in the same span last year. 
The number of traffic deaths  which the city had vowed to eliminate by this year  remains largely where it was 10 years ago after a brief pandemic increase. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.3%Violet Miller: 2.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.4%Availability Heuristic10.3%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 2.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 3.9%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.9%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 4.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 9.4%Violet Miller: 1.7%Chicago Sun-Times: 6.4%Negativity Bias9.4%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.9%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 1.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.1%Violet Miller: 0.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.3%Recency Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.8%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 2.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 3.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 1.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 4.3%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 1.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 2.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.7%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.9%Chicago Sun-Times: 3.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Violet Miller: 0.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

552 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker11%attributed speech491writer words
Selected voice

Andrea Blacio

0%flagged-word coverage
61 attributed words100% of attributed speech28% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.