US Navy’s nuclear propulsion infrastructure to get upgrade with $85 million Amentum contract ⁠75%

By Bojan Stojkovski⁠88%

7/25/2026, 12:58:48 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 41.4% saturation with 201 hits. Analysis detected 889 faulty-reasoning hits from 486 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 66.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (5,562 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 74.60% of the article peer group.

US defense contractor Amentum has secured an $85 million contract to support the modernization of critical infrastructure within the US Navy’s Nuclear Propulsion Program (NNPP). 
The three-year agreement will focus on redesigning and upgrading spent fuel examination capabilities at the Naval Reactors Facility in Idaho, a key site responsible for supporting the Navy’s nuclear fleet. 
The new facility will allow scientists and engineers to analyze used fuel cores, comparing real-world performance data with predictions from advanced design and testing processes. 
The company points out that these efforts will help improve the safety, reliability, and long-term mission capability of the Navy’s nuclear-powered vessels . 
Strengthening the Navy’s nuclear fuel evaluation capabilities 
According to Mark Whitney, president of Amentum’s energy and environment business, the project reflects the company’s continued focus on providing the engineering expertise and operational support needed to sustain the US Navy’s nuclear-powered fleet. 
By upgrading critical spent fuel examination capabilities, Amentum aims to help the Navy better analyze, optimize, and extend the performance of nuclear fuel cores . 
The modernization effort is expected to provide engineers and scientists with improved tools and data to support future fleet readiness, safety, and reliability. 
Whitney further noted that Amentum’s broader nuclear expertise positions the company to support some of the most complex challenges in the sector. 
He said the company’s capabilities cover the full nuclear project lifecycle, delivering safe, innovative, and reliable solutions for customers worldwide. 
He also added that Amentum’s integrated global nuclear expertise enables the company to take on demanding projects, including efforts that support the US Navy in maintaining the effectiveness of its nuclear-powered fleet. 
Nuclear propulsion program marks decades of innovation and reliability 
For more than seven decades, the Navy’s NNPP has remained at the forefront of nuclear technology, developing advanced systems to power the Navy’s global fleet. 
The program has built a reputation for combining innovation, safety, reliability, and operational efficiency, enabling nuclear-powered vessels to perform critical missions around the world. 
Through continuous research, engineering advancements, and rigorous testing, the NNPP continues to support the long-term performance of the US Navy’s nuclear capabilities, Amentum highlights. 
A collaboration between the Department of Energy and the Department of the Navy, the NNPP is responsible for overseeing the design, development, and operational support required to sustain the Navy’s nuclear-powered fleet. 
The program plays a central role in maintaining US maritime advantage by ensuring warfighters have access to vessels with exceptional endurance, stealth , responsiveness, and advanced warfighting capabilities. 
Through its work across the nuclear propulsion lifecycle, the NNPP helps support the reliability of the Navy’s strategic naval assets. 
Furthermore, as operator of the world’s largest nuclear-powered fleet, including 11 active aircraft carriers and more than 70 submarines, the Navy relies on programs such as the NNPP and partners like Amentum to support the safety, performance, and long-term sustainability of its nuclear propulsion systems. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 3.1%Interesting Engineering: 3.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.7%Interesting Engineering: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 2.0%Interesting Engineering: 2.4%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.9%Interesting Engineering: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 8.6%Bojan Stojkovski: 8.8%Interesting Engineering: 5.2%Overconfidence Bias8.6%This article: 19.8%Bojan Stojkovski: 7.2%Interesting Engineering: 6.4%Framing Effect19.8%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.3%Interesting Engineering: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.3%Interesting Engineering: 0.5%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 14.6%Bojan Stojkovski: 22.1%Interesting Engineering: 16.9%Optimism Bias14.6%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.5%Interesting Engineering: 0.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.9%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 37.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 5.5%Interesting Engineering: 4.6%Self-Serving Bias37.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.6%Interesting Engineering: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 16.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 10.7%Interesting Engineering: 5.2%Halo Effect16.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.3%Interesting Engineering: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 17.1%Bojan Stojkovski: 13.2%Interesting Engineering: 8.6%Appeal to Authority17.1%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 1.0%Interesting Engineering: 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.5%Interesting Engineering: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 4.4%Interesting Engineering: 5.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.5%Interesting Engineering: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 1.4%Interesting Engineering: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.8%Bojan Stojkovski: 1.0%Interesting Engineering: 2.3%Appeal to Emotion5.8%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 1.9%Interesting Engineering: 1.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 1.9%Interesting Engineering: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.6%Interesting Engineering: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.7%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 2.0%Interesting Engineering: 2.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.2%Interesting Engineering: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 1.7%Interesting Engineering: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 22.6%Bojan Stojkovski: 4.7%Interesting Engineering: 3.9%Biased Writer Voice22.6%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 1.1%Interesting Engineering: 0.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.0%Interesting Engineering: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bojan Stojkovski: 0.3%Interesting Engineering: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 41.4%Bojan Stojkovski: 19.5%Interesting Engineering: 10.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…41.4%

486 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers37%attributed speech306writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageAmentum • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageMark Whitney • 34 words • 100.0% coverageAmentum • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageMark Whitney • 22 words • 100.0% coverageMark Whitney • 20 words • 100.0% coverageMark Whitney • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageAmentum • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Mark Whitney

100%flagged-word coverage
108 attributed words60% of attributed speech58% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +85.3 ptsWriter: 14.7%Mark Whitney: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-35.9 ptsWriter: 35.9%Mark Whitney: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.