Microsoft may make big changes to bring Android and Windows 11 closer together - Android Authority 7%

By Ryan McNeal19%

7/12/2026, 5:45:59 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Framing Effect, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 58.2% saturation with 318 hits. Analysis detected 935 faulty-reasoning hits from 546 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 23.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (20,399 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 93.20% of the article peer group.

Affiliate links on Android Authority may earn us a commission. 
Learn more. 
Microsoft may make big changes to bring Android and Windows 11 closer together 
Microsoft wants to deepen Android integration and make it more seamless on Windows. 
Jul 12, 2026  1:45 PM ET 
Tushar Mehta / Android Authority 
Follow us on Google Discover Add us as preferred source 
Microsoft is reportedly working on integrating your phone more deeply into Windows 11 by improving and expanding upon Phone Link’s experiences. 
One change is a new dedicated smartphone flyout that provides an overview of your phone’s status, as well as toggles for features such as do not disturb and vibrate mode. 
The company is also said to be working on a new dedicated messaging app that will exist as a standalone experience. 
Microsoft has long been working on ways to bring Windows and your Android phone closer together . 
In 2018, the company launched the Your Phone and Your Phone Companion apps, which let you bring certain capabilities and content from your phone to your PC. 
These apps later got rebranded to Phone Link and Link to Windows. 
A new report says that Microsoft is now exploring ways to expand and improve upon Phone Link so these experiences feel more native to its own OS. 
According to Windows Central , Microsoft is discussing several upgrades, one of which will enhance the Phone Companion found in Start. 
It’s reported that the Phone Companion will show more recent activities, and you won’t need to open Phone Link to look through them. 
Additionally, you’ll be able to hover over these activities to learn more, such as viewing a full message. 
The next change that could come our way is a new dedicated smartphone pop-up. 
You’ll reportedly see a phone icon on the Taskbar, like in the mock-up above, when your phone is connected. 
Clicking on the icon will open a flyout that contains an overview of your phone’s status, along with buttons to toggle certain features. 
A few of the toggles that the outlet lists are do not disturb, vibrate mode, and find phone. 
It appears you’ll also be able to transfer files to your phone by dragging them to the phone icon. 
Another update that’s mentioned is an improvement to clipboard history syncing. 
Right now, you can sync your clipboard between your phone and PC, but only the last thing you copied is remembered. 
Microsoft is said to be working on an improvement that would sync your entire clipboard history between the two devices. 
The final upgrade revealed in this report describes a new dedicated Messages app. 
There’s already a messaging feature in the Phone Link app. 
However, the new Messages app would be a standalone app that you can pin and access from the Start menu. 
At the moment, the outlet’s sources say that these features are being prototyped internally. 
There’s a chance that they could change to some extent before users get their hands on them. 
Microsoft will also likely be looking for feedback from its Insider community before release. 
Microsoft Microsoft Phone Link Windows 11 
Thank you for being part of our community. 
Read our Comment Policy before posting. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 3.3%Android Authority: 4.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.6%Android Authority: 2.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Ryan McNeal: 3.4%Android Authority: 3.7%Availability Heuristic3.8%This article: 4.9%Ryan McNeal: 1.8%Android Authority: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic4.9%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 1.0%Android Authority: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 18.3%Ryan McNeal: 1.8%Android Authority: 3.3%Overconfidence Bias18.3%This article: 9.0%Ryan McNeal: 4.5%Android Authority: 5.6%Framing Effect9.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 1.5%Android Authority: 1.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.8%Ryan McNeal: 0.4%Android Authority: 1.3%Status Quo Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.0%Android Authority: 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 35.3%Ryan McNeal: 6.7%Android Authority: 7.0%Optimism Bias35.3%This article: 5.7%Ryan McNeal: 0.9%Android Authority: 1.9%Pessimism Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.9%Android Authority: 6.3%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.1%Android Authority: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.0%Android Authority: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.0%Android Authority: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.4%Android Authority: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.0%Android Authority: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Ryan McNeal: 0.8%Android Authority: 4.6%Halo Effect2.4%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.0%Android Authority: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.0%Android Authority: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.5%Ryan McNeal: 1.6%Android Authority: 2.2%Recency Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.2%Android Authority: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.0%Android Authority: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.0%Android Authority: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.0%Android Authority: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.8%Ryan McNeal: 2.8%Android Authority: 2.8%Appeal to Authority3.8%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.5%Android Authority: 2.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.2%Android Authority: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.0%Android Authority: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 3.2%Android Authority: 8.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.0%Android Authority: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.6%Android Authority: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 1.0%Android Authority: 3.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.3%Android Authority: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 1.0%Android Authority: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.0%Android Authority: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.1%Android Authority: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.2%Android Authority: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.4%Android Authority: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 1.7%Android Authority: 6.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.0%Android Authority: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.3%Ryan McNeal: 1.7%Android Authority: 3.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.3%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.0%Android Authority: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.2%Android Authority: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.0%Android Authority: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.0%Android Authority: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.0%Android Authority: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 58.2%Ryan McNeal: 5.4%Android Authority: 2.1%Unattributed Quote58.2%This article: 3.5%Ryan McNeal: 0.4%Android Authority: 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection3.5%This article: 7.5%Ryan McNeal: 2.4%Android Authority: 12.4%Biased Writer Voice7.5%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.5%Android Authority: 2.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.0%Android Authority: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan McNeal: 0.0%Android Authority: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Ryan McNeal: 6.9%Android Authority: 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.0%

546 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers4.8%attributed speech520writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageTushar Mehta • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWindows Central • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Windows Central

100%flagged-word coverage
21 attributed words81% of attributed speech85% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+42.9 ptsWriter: 57.1%Windows Central: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-7.9 ptsWriter: 7.9%Windows Central: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.2 ptsWriter: 4.2%Windows Central: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.7 ptsWriter: 3.7%Windows Central: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.