STLPR0%

Already on the hook for millions, St. Louis faces new police shooting lawsuit 6%

By Luke Nozicka0%

4/17/2026, 8:04:52 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Recency Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 29.8% saturation with 148 hits. Analysis detected 1,136 faulty-reasoning hits from 497 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 21.9% and a BS Rank of 6% (20,648 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 94.30% of the article peer group.

A St. 
Louis man who says he was unarmed when an officer shot him in the back last year is suing the city, which already has to pay out millions in shooting judgments. 
Vincent Simmons filed a federal lawsuit last week against the police board and the St. 
Louis Metropolitan Police Department officer who shot him. 
The officer shot Simmons while Simmons was using both hands to climb a wood fence, the lawsuit says. 
The shooting unfolded March 8, 2025, in north city. 
Officers initially responded to a call about a truck’s license plate being tied to a felony stealing case in Richmond Heights. 
The truck fled, leading to a pursuit, before it crashed in the 5000 block of Kingshighway. 
Simmons got out and ran, police said at the time. 
Two officers chased Simmons into an alley. 
They had no reason to believe Simmons was armed, according to his lawsuit. 
One of them found Simmons “crouched in the corner” of a backyard before he got up to climb a fence. 
That’s when an officer fired at least twice, striking Simmons in the back and injuring his stomach and other organs, his attorneys said. 
Simmons survived the shooting and was taken to Barnes-Jewish Hospital. 
Police at the time said a weapon was recovered from inside the truck. 
Simmons was charged and recently pleaded guilty to resisting arrest and a drug charge. 
Prosecutors had also charged him with unlawful possession of a firearm but later dropped the charge. 
Simmons’ lawsuit alleges excessive force, among other claims. 
St. 
Louis police declined to comment on the pending litigation. 
St. 
Louis already owes millions from police shooting judgments. 
Last month, a jury awarded $37 million to a man who was shot by police in 2016 when he was 14  believed to be one of the largest police shooting judgments in Missouri. 
The city also owes millions to the family of an 18-year-old killed by police in 2015. 
And earlier this week, an attorney for the family of 17-year-old Emeshyon Wilkins released body camera footage that contradicted the police narrative of his 2024 killing. 
Testifying last month before a Missouri Senate committee, Mayor Cara Spencer noted one of the recent police shooting judgments and said there were dozens of outstanding civil cases against the city. 
“These are judgments that often carry very, very significant costs, and they are a large burden to us,” Spencer said. 
The city is suing to strike down a Missouri law requiring a state board to oversee its police department. 
The Midwest Newsroom is an investigative and enterprise journalism collaboration that includes Iowa Public Radio, KCUR, Nebraska Public Media, St. 
Louis Public Radio and NPR. 
There are many ways you can contact us with story ideas and leads, and you can find that information here. 
The Midwest Newsroom is a partner of The Trust Project. 
We invite you to review our ethics and practices here. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.7%Luke Nozicka: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias14.7%This article: 7.8%Luke Nozicka: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias7.8%This article: 20.9%Luke Nozicka: 3.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic20.9%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 14.5%Luke Nozicka: 4.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect14.5%This article: 7.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion7.0%This article: 3.8%Luke Nozicka: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias3.8%This article: 7.8%Luke Nozicka: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect7.8%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 1.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 27.0%Luke Nozicka: 7.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias27.0%This article: 4.0%Luke Nozicka: 2.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias4.0%This article: 2.8%Luke Nozicka: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error2.8%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Luke Nozicka: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect2.0%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 19.7%Luke Nozicka: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias19.7%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.2%Luke Nozicka: 3.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority8.2%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.5%Luke Nozicka: 4.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization8.5%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.0%Luke Nozicka: 6.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion4.0%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 2.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.6%Luke Nozicka: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof1.6%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 18.9%Luke Nozicka: 4.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal18.9%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.8%Luke Nozicka: 1.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.8%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 29.8%Luke Nozicka: 1.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote29.8%This article: 4.0%Luke Nozicka: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection4.0%This article: 13.5%Luke Nozicka: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice13.5%This article: 2.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination2.0%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Luke Nozicka: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.0%

497 words analyzed.

Speakers

8speakers31%attributed speech345writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageVincent Simmons • 15 words • 0.0% coverageLouis Metropolitan Police Department • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageSimmons • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageLouis police • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageEmeshyon Wilkins • 26 words • 100.0% coverageCara Spencer • 31 words • 0.0% coverageCara Spencer • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageMidwest Newsroom • 20 words • 0.0% coverageNPR • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageMidwest Newsroom • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Emeshyon Wilkins

100%flagged-word coverage
26 attributed words17% of attributed speech81% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+88.1 ptsWriter: 11.9%Emeshyon Wilkins: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-37.1 ptsWriter: 37.1%Emeshyon Wilkins: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.8 ptsWriter: 5.8%Emeshyon Wilkins: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-2.9 ptsWriter: 2.9%Emeshyon Wilkins: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.