Iran Negotiations Day 18: Khamenei’s Tehran Funeral Ceremonies Continue ⁠35%

By Harrison Berger⁠73%

7/5/2026, 10:35:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Representativeness Heuristic, and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 45.3% saturation with 164 hits. Analysis detected 700 faulty-reasoning hits from 362 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (14,394 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 65.80% of the article peer group.

Hundreds of thousands of mourners were reported to have gathered in Tehran to pay respects to former Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei by the second day of funeral ceremonies on Sunday, the 18th day of negotiations to end the Iran War. 
Khamenei was assassinated by the U.S. and Israel on February 28. 
Senior Iranian officials, though not the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, have attended the dayslong funeral. 
The Grayzone’s Max Blumenthal, reporting from Tehran, observed backlash to the Iranian government’s decision to proceed with negotiations to end the war and mass distrust of the U.S. and Israel, noting that “there are indignant calls for vengeance, displays of sorrow and defiance, protest.” 
A Financial Times poll which surveyed 1,795 registered voters from June 26-30 was released on Sunday and found that 58 percent of registered U.S. voters said the Iran War had not been worth the cost, with only 28 percent saying the war had been worth it. 
The White House in June asked Congress for $67 billion to cover the cost of the Iran War. 
FT noted, 
the conflict — which has pushed petrol and other consumer prices sharply higher this year — continues to drag down the president’s approval. 
Just 36 percent of voters said they approved of the job Trump was doing as president, a two-point drop compared with the previous month. 
Among independents, the drop-off was sharper, with an approval rate of just 21 per cent, an eight-point decline from one month earlier. 
Lebanon’s National News Agency reported Israeli helicopter fire and airstrikes in areas of southern Lebanon occupied by Israeli soldiers, sustaining a military campaign that Tehran warns could derail the Iran War peace process. 
The first article of the 60-day interim agreement, which entered into effect on June 17, requires the “immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon” and commits the U.S. to “ensuring the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Lebanon.” 
A separate framework negotiated by Secretary of State Marco Rubio between the U.S., Israel, and the Lebanese government conditions any Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon on “the verified disarmament” of Hezbollah. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.4%Harrison Berger: 6.8%The American Conservative: 8.1%Confirmation Bias9.4%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.4%The American Conservative: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.2%Harrison Berger: 5.5%The American Conservative: 3.8%Availability Heuristic12.2%This article: 12.7%Harrison Berger: 1.1%The American Conservative: 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic12.7%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.4%The American Conservative: 1.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 4.2%The American Conservative: 3.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 8.3%Harrison Berger: 12.5%The American Conservative: 8.1%Framing Effect8.3%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.5%The American Conservative: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.4%Harrison Berger: 0.4%The American Conservative: 0.6%Status Quo Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.1%The American Conservative: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 1.4%The American Conservative: 1.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Harrison Berger: 2.3%The American Conservative: 2.7%Pessimism Bias6.4%This article: 45.3%Harrison Berger: 12.2%The American Conservative: 10.6%Negativity Bias45.3%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 2.2%The American Conservative: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 1.5%The American Conservative: 2.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 9.1%Harrison Berger: 0.3%The American Conservative: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias9.1%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 1.6%The American Conservative: 2.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 1.8%The American Conservative: 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.4%The American Conservative: 1.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.1%The American Conservative: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.0%The American Conservative: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 12.7%Harrison Berger: 2.4%The American Conservative: 1.4%Recency Bias12.7%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.5%The American Conservative: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.2%The American Conservative: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 2.0%The American Conservative: 2.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.7%The American Conservative: 2.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 7.8%The American Conservative: 4.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 3.0%The American Conservative: 3.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 2.8%The American Conservative: 2.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.2%The American Conservative: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 7.1%The American Conservative: 10.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.1%The American Conservative: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.8%The American Conservative: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 7.1%The American Conservative: 5.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 2.1%The American Conservative: 1.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.4%Harrison Berger: 3.5%The American Conservative: 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.4%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.3%The American Conservative: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.8%The American Conservative: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.0%The American Conservative: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.1%The American Conservative: 0.5%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 12.2%Harrison Berger: 1.0%The American Conservative: 2.1%Anecdotal12.2%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.2%The American Conservative: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 42.3%Harrison Berger: 2.5%The American Conservative: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)42.3%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.0%The American Conservative: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.0%The American Conservative: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.0%The American Conservative: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.2%The American Conservative: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.3%The American Conservative: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 12.2%Harrison Berger: 6.5%The American Conservative: 3.4%Unattributed Quote12.2%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 4.3%The American Conservative: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 10.8%The American Conservative: 17.3%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 1.3%The American Conservative: 2.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 1.2%The American Conservative: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 1.0%The American Conservative: 3.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.4%The American Conservative: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

362 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers54%attributed speech166writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageMax Blumenthal • 44 words • 100.0% coverageFinancial Times • 46 words • 0.0% coverageWhite House • 18 words • 0.0% coverageFinancial Times • 2 words • 0.0% coverageFinancial Times • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageLebanon’s National News Agency • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 30 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Max Blumenthal

100%flagged-word coverage
44 attributed words22% of attributed speech69% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Max Blumenthal: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.