Kansas City nurses at Research Medical Center say cuts are putting pregnant patients at risk 27%

By Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga0%

6/8/2026, 9:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 1,037 faulty-reasoning hits from 604 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 38.4% and a BS Rank of 27% (16,031 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 73.20% of the article peer group.

Nurses at Research Medical Center in southern Kansas City say although the hospital no longer operates a labor and delivery unit, pregnant patients still show up in the emergency room, some under the impression the department still exists. 
“We have patients that have given birth to their previous children at this hospital and they believe that they'll be able to walk in and do the same thing when that's not the case,” said Olivia Huggans, an emergency room nurse at Research Medical. 
Huggans said this strains emergency room staff. 
Huggans, other nurses and union members voiced safety concerns at a rally hosted on Thursday night by their union, National Nurses United. 
Huggans said nurses at Research Medical don’t have adequate training or supplies to properly respond to an obstetric emergency. 
“We are also understaffed at baseline,” Huggans said. 
“Every single shift at Research Medical Center is understaffed.” 
Huggans said they see pregnant patients in the emergency room on a weekly basis. 
She said in September, when the hospital announced it would close the unit because not enough patients needed it, leadership promised a nurse who specializes in obstetrics would be on staff at all times. 
But Huggans said the hospital hasn’t made good on that promise. 
“We have some OB coverage, but mostly not on nights and weekends,” she said. 
“The hospital is left without anyone in the hospital that is trained to deliver a baby.” 
The hospital's website has 105 open listings for various nurse positions at Research Medical's main and Brookside campuses. 
Three of the listings are for obstetrics trauma registered nurses. 
A spokesperson for HCA Midwest Health, which owns Research Medical, said the staff levels at the hospital are appropriate to safely meet the needs of their patients. 
Nurses demand hospital leadership provide a trauma-trained obstetric nurse for all shifts, including nights and weekends; equipment needed for fetal monitoring and obstetric emergencies; and more registered nurses per shift. 
They also want leadership to review how ready the emergency and operating rooms are to respond to obstetric emergencies, and post signs in the emergency room notifying patients the hospital doesn’t have a labor and delivery unit anymore. 
Christine Hamele, a spokesperson for HCA Midwest Health, spoke against the rally. 
“Activity like this  attempting to take advantage of unrelated situations to gain attention  is unfortunately a routine tactic from this labor union,” she said. 
Hamele said pregnant patients show up at emergency rooms that don’t have labor and delivery services nationwide. 
She said Research Medical is ready. 
“Our physicians, nurses and clinical teams are extensively and regularly trained to evaluate and care for both mother and baby and to coordinate any necessary transfer for ongoing obstetric care,” Hamele said. 
Hamele did not respond to specific questions about what training they’ve offered for obstetric emergencies or if they will offer more. 
She did not answer questions about when the hospital has an obstetrics nurse on staff or if nurses have consistent access to the equipment they would need to care for a pregnant patient, like fetal monitoring tools. 
Jake Liston, a union member who works in the emergency room at Research Medical’s Brookside campus, said Research Medical Center is a landmark in the community. 
He said many patients arrive on foot or by bus and choose Research Medical because it is the closest. 
“HCA should be ready for them,” Liston said. 
“There's no excuses from the nursing perspective for HCA not to be giving us all the tools we need to treat our patients in this community.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.3%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.9%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Confirmation Bias5.3%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.5%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 14.7%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 1.8%Columbia Missourian: 2.7%Availability Heuristic14.7%This article: 4.5%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.6%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic4.5%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 1.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 4.3%Columbia Missourian: 5.5%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 5.6%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.8%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Loss Aversion5.6%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.5%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.5%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 6.1%Columbia Missourian: 4.5%Optimism Bias5.5%This article: 13.6%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 1.9%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%Pessimism Bias13.6%This article: 18.9%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 5.2%Columbia Missourian: 5.4%Negativity Bias18.9%This article: 4.5%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 1.7%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias4.5%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.6%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.6%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%In-Group Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.9%Columbia Missourian: 2.4%Halo Effect4.3%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 8.6%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.9%Columbia Missourian: 0.5%Ad Hominem8.6%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.8%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 3.2%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Appeal to Authority9.8%This article: 9.3%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.8%Columbia Missourian: 1.1%False Dilemma9.3%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 1.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.4%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 4.0%Columbia Missourian: 3.6%Hasty Generalization10.4%This article: 4.6%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Red Herring4.6%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.9%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 5.9%Columbia Missourian: 5.2%Appeal to Emotion9.9%This article: 1.8%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.6%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Begging the Question1.8%This article: 1.2%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 1.4%Columbia Missourian: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)1.2%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 8.6%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.5%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Burden of Proof8.6%This article: 2.8%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature2.8%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 15.2%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 2.5%Columbia Missourian: 2.6%Anecdotal15.2%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.6%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 1.2%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.6%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.8%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.9%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 1.4%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bek Shackelford-Nwanganga: 0.6%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

604 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers62%attributed speech229writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageOlivia Huggans • 44 words • 0.0% coverageOlivia Huggans • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageOlivia Huggans • 19 words • 0.0% coverageOlivia Huggans • 8 words • 0.0% coverageOlivia Huggans • 9 words • 0.0% coverageOlivia Huggans • 14 words • 0.0% coverageOlivia Huggans • 34 words • 0.0% coverageOlivia Huggans • 11 words • 0.0% coverageOlivia Huggans • 14 words • 0.0% coverageOlivia Huggans • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageHCA Midwest Health • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageChristine Hamele • 12 words • 0.0% coverageChristine Hamele • 26 words • 0.0% coverageChristine Hamele • 17 words • 0.0% coverageChristine Hamele • 6 words • 0.0% coverageChristine Hamele • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageJake Liston • 26 words • 0.0% coverageJake Liston • 19 words • 0.0% coverageJake Liston • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJake Liston • 26 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

HCA Midwest Health

100%flagged-word coverage
27 attributed words7.2% of attributed speech58% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.