"We've got a few more surprises coming" Microsoft talks what's next for Surface and the people's desire for a Surface Studio monitor in new video ⁠59%

By Zac Bowden⁠58%

7/24/2026, 10:34:03 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 38.2% saturation with 211 hits. Analysis detected 1,447 faulty-reasoning hits from 552 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 55.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (9,023 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 58.80% of the article peer group.

"We've got a few more surprises coming" Microsoft talks what's next for Surface and the people's desire for a Surface Studio monitor in new video 
In a new video, Microsoft Executive Vice President of Windows+Devices Pavan Davuluri, and Corporate Vice President of Surface Brett Ostrum have sat down to talk about what's next for Surface, including more details about the upcoming Surface Laptop Ultra , hints at more surprises to come this year, and even acknowledges people's want for a Surface Studio monitor and Surface Mini. 
In the 20 minute video, Davuluri and Ostrum discuss the year so far for Surface PCs. 
They recap recent announcements around Surface Pro 12 and Surface Laptop 8 with Intel and Snapdragon SoCs, along with the surprise announcements around Surface Laptop Ultra and RTX Spark back in June. 
In regards to what's next for Surface, Ostrum clarifies that Surface is going to continue doing what it has always done; validate platform advancements through hardware. 
Just like it validated touch, pen, and Windows Hello with Surface in the past, the company is currently focused on using Surface to validate Windows on Arm, as recently seen with the RTX Spark. 
"We are there to help show what is possible from an experience perspective in terms of technology and experiences and help to lead the way for the ecosystem. 
These days, oftentimes it shows up in the form of helping to stand up brand new platforms like the, RTX Silicon from NVIDIA. 
And so I think for us that work will continue." 
Ostrum also reminds viewers that Surface still has the Surface Laptop Ultra and RTX Spark to come this year, and teases that there's more announcements to come, though doesn't dive into details as to what that might entail, "We have a few more surprises coming before the end of the year, so I'm looking forward to that." 
In a segment answering community submitted questions, Microsoft also touches on fans' want for more Surface peripherals, including a Surface Studio monitor. 
Ostrum acknowledges that the Surface Studio is the most beautiful display they've ever shipped, but doesn't confirm plans to address the want for a standalone monitor. 
"My history is in mouse and keyboards, and I do believe that the Surface Studio screen is the most beautiful screen we have ever shipped," Ostrum says before the video is jarringly cut to the next question. 
Could Microsoft be hinting that a Surface Studio monitor is finally in the works? 
Another question also asks about the infamous Surface Mini, a device that Microsoft came very close to shipping in 2014 before being canceled at the last minute. 
The user submitted question asks if they can have a Surface Mini, and Davuluri jokingly says "We've got a few laying around somewhere, I think." 
Ostrum follows up with "We typically don't comment on future looking Surface roadmaps, Pavan." 
If you're a fan of Surface and Windows on Arm, this month's episode of Inside Windows is a great watch. 
Be sure to check it out on the official Windows YouTube channel. 
Join us on Reddit at r/WindowsCentral to share your insights and discuss our latest news, reviews, and more. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 19.7%Zac Bowden: 6.0%Windows Central: 4.2%Confirmation Bias19.7%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.3%Windows Central: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 20.1%Zac Bowden: 4.3%Windows Central: 4.6%Availability Heuristic20.1%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.9%Windows Central: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 6.2%Zac Bowden: 0.7%Windows Central: 0.8%Hindsight Bias6.2%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 3.7%Windows Central: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 15.8%Zac Bowden: 6.4%Windows Central: 5.0%Framing Effect15.8%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.5%Windows Central: 1.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 12.0%Zac Bowden: 1.2%Windows Central: 0.9%Status Quo Bias12.0%This article: 4.9%Zac Bowden: 0.3%Windows Central: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect4.9%This article: 25.7%Zac Bowden: 14.7%Windows Central: 8.0%Optimism Bias25.7%This article: 4.5%Zac Bowden: 1.5%Windows Central: 3.0%Pessimism Bias4.5%This article: 4.7%Zac Bowden: 5.8%Windows Central: 8.6%Negativity Bias4.7%This article: 4.7%Zac Bowden: 0.8%Windows Central: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias4.7%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 1.2%Windows Central: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.6%Zac Bowden: 0.7%Windows Central: 1.2%In-Group Bias7.6%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 11.8%Zac Bowden: 3.9%Windows Central: 4.1%Halo Effect11.8%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.1%Windows Central: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 16.1%Zac Bowden: 3.0%Windows Central: 2.2%Recency Bias16.1%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.2%Windows Central: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.2%Windows Central: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.2%Zac Bowden: 3.3%Windows Central: 3.7%Appeal to Authority2.2%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.6%Windows Central: 1.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.1%Windows Central: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.1%Windows Central: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.2%Zac Bowden: 10.2%Windows Central: 8.5%Hasty Generalization4.2%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.3%Zac Bowden: 1.9%Windows Central: 1.1%Bandwagon3.3%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 2.0%Windows Central: 3.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 1.1%Windows Central: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.2%Zac Bowden: 5.3%Windows Central: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.2%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.4%Windows Central: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.5%Windows Central: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 7.1%Windows Central: 4.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 38.2%Zac Bowden: 3.9%Windows Central: 2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)38.2%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 2.9%Windows Central: 3.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 6.7%Zac Bowden: 1.3%Windows Central: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection6.7%This article: 26.8%Zac Bowden: 12.4%Windows Central: 13.9%Biased Writer Voice26.8%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 1.1%Windows Central: 1.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 20.8%Zac Bowden: 5.1%Windows Central: 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…20.8%

552 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers51%attributed speech272writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 61 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageBrett Ostrum • 26 words • 0.0% coverageBrett Ostrum • 34 words • 0.0% coverageBrett Ostrum • 28 words • 100.0% coverageBrett Ostrum • 23 words • 0.0% coverageBrett Ostrum • 10 words • 0.0% coverageBrett Ostrum • 57 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageBrett Ostrum • 26 words • 0.0% coverageBrett Ostrum • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coveragePavan Davuluri • 25 words • 0.0% coverageBrett Ostrum • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Brett Ostrum

100%flagged-word coverage
255 attributed words91% of attributed speech94% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Biased Writer Voice-26.3 ptsWriter: 40.8%Brett Ostrum: 14.5%14.5%Attempt to Sell a Product +22.3 ptsWriter: 11.0%Brett Ostrum: 33.3%33.3%Quote-first Misdirection+14.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Brett Ostrum: 14.5%14.5%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.