Greg Gutfeld's What Did I Miss?98%

5/14/2025, 12:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, False Dilemma, and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 112 hits. Analysis detected 273 faulty-reasoning hits from 112 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 97.8% and a BS Rank of 98% (455 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 97.90% of the article peer group.

Greg Gutfeld's new game show puts four contestants, fresh from 90 days of isolation, to the test. 
Can they spot real news from fake? 
With surprise guests and wild twists, only one leaves a winner. 
Greg Gutfeld hosts What Did I Miss?, a high-stakes, reality game show for FOX Nation where four contestants return from 90 days of total isolation. 
No phones, no internet, no clue. 
Now, they must figure out what's real news and what's fake as they face wild headlines, twisted stories, and surprise guests. 
With help (or not) from Kat Timpf and Jamie Lissow, their instincts are pushed to the limit. 
Only one of them can leave a winner. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 22.3%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias22.3%This article: 18.8%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic18.8%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 100.0%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect100.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 17.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion17.0%This article: 30.4%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias30.4%This article: 15.2%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias15.2%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 15.2%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias15.2%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 25.0%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma25.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%

112 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.