STLPR0%

Kehoe signs $50.7B Missouri state budget into law, issues over 60 vetoes 15%

By Sarah Kellogg38%

6/30/2026, 11:53:23 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Unattributed Quote, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.3% saturation with 73 hits. Analysis detected 380 faulty-reasoning hits from 278 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 31% and a BS Rank of 15% (18,140 of 21,198 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the article peer group.

Missouri officially has a budget for the new fiscal year. 
Gov. 
Mike Kehoe announced Tuesday that he signed the bills that make up the $50.7 billion state budget for the fiscal year that begins Wednesday. 
The state operating budget is around $49.8 billion. 
Of that amount, $15.7 billion is made up of general revenue. 
In a statement, Kehoe said the budget “funds smart and necessary investments, while also taking an important step toward right-sizing government to ensure Missouri remains positioned for long-term success.” 
Included in the budget is nearly $10 billion for education, including K-12 and higher education, and over $2 billion for public safety. 
That includes $60 million in general revenue toward the Empowerment Scholarship Account program, which allows families to get funding to send their children to the school of their choice, including private schools. 
It also includes $91.9 million toward the currently ongoing World Cup, for which Kansas City is one of the host cities. 
Federal dollars are a part of that total. 
Missouri faced its tightest budget in years. 
That’s in part due to the state either spending or allocating the glut of federal funding it received, including from the American Rescue Plan Act. 
Kehoe issued 65 vetoes, totaling over $30 million in general revenue. 
Additionally, he issued 78 withholds. 
That means he didn’t veto the item but is not releasing the funding. 
Those expenditure restrictions totaled over $440 million, including over $337 million in general revenue. 
Kehoe’s office said the vetoes and restrictions were “limited to new projects, improper funding sources for new appropriations, or an over appropriation of various funds.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.0%Sarah Kellogg: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias9.0%This article: 2.9%Sarah Kellogg: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias2.9%This article: 7.6%Sarah Kellogg: 1.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic7.6%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 26.3%Sarah Kellogg: 7.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect26.3%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 10.4%Sarah Kellogg: 3.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias10.4%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 2.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 11.9%Sarah Kellogg: 4.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias11.9%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 1.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 1.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 1.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 3.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 10.4%Sarah Kellogg: 9.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion10.4%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 9.0%Sarah Kellogg: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 2.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 19.4%Sarah Kellogg: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)19.4%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 19.4%Sarah Kellogg: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote19.4%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 1.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 10.4%Sarah Kellogg: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice10.4%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Kellogg: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

278 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers28%attributed speech200writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageMike Kehoe • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageMike Kehoe • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageKehoe’s office • 25 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Mike Kehoe

55%flagged-word coverage
53 attributed words68% of attributed speech60% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Unattributed Quote+54.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Mike Kehoe: 54.7%54.7%Biased Writer Voice+54.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Mike Kehoe: 54.7%54.7%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.