ID@Xbox Indie Select Indie Hub ⁠79%

By Jacob York⁠0%

3/20/2025, 2:08:57 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 93.5% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 392 faulty-reasoning hits from 77 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 70.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (4,738 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 78.40% of the article peer group.

The ID@Xbox Indie Select Indie Hub is a showcase for the best and brightest upcoming indie games for Xbox and Windows PC. 
This hub aims to highlight the diverse and innovative titles being developed by independent studios, providing a central location for players to discover new favorites and support the indie game development scene. 
It features a curated selection of games that represent the creativity and passion driving the indie gaming community. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 4.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 4.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 23.4%Jacob York: 5.8%Windows Central: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic23.4%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 7.1%Windows Central: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 5.0%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 1.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 41.6%Jacob York: 31.2%Windows Central: 8.0%Optimism Bias41.6%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 3.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 8.6%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 41.6%Jacob York: 10.4%Windows Central: 1.2%In-Group Bias41.6%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 51.9%Jacob York: 24.7%Windows Central: 4.1%Halo Effect51.9%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 2.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 28.6%Jacob York: 7.1%Windows Central: 0.5%Primacy Effect28.6%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 3.7%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 1.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 41.6%Jacob York: 23.4%Windows Central: 8.5%Hasty Generalization41.6%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 51.9%Jacob York: 23.4%Windows Central: 3.8%Appeal to Emotion51.9%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 4.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 3.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 93.5%Jacob York: 46.8%Windows Central: 13.9%Biased Writer Voice93.5%This article: 41.6%Jacob York: 10.4%Windows Central: 1.9%Indoctrination41.6%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob York: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 93.5%Jacob York: 70.1%Windows Central: 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…93.5%

77 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.