The Verge56%

This puzzle game’s simple premise hides surprising depth 31%

By Jay Peters31%

6/27/2026, 5:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 53.6% saturation with 228 hits. Analysis detected 712 faulty-reasoning hits from 425 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40.6% and a BS Rank of 31% (15,132 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 69.10% of the article peer group.

What’s the Password? 
has a simple concept: To solve each of the game’s more than 100 puzzles, you have to type in the right four-digit password on a number pad. 
That might sound like a limited constraint. 
But the simplicity gives solo developer Dan DiIorio, better known as TrampolineTales, lots of room to play with clever ideas. 
Over the course of a few hours, the game never stopped surprising me. 
Puzzle clues come in several different formats. 
Some are written text; the very first puzzle is a sentence that tells you what numbers to punch in. 
But you’ll also have to decipher four-digit codes from things like the blinking digits of a clock, nonogram puzzles, solving arithmetic, and even counting the number of teeth on a key. 
Clues can get a little meta, too, like ones referencing a password on the game’s cover art or information in menus. 
The puzzles can be tough. 
I’d get a few right away, but for most, I’d have to try a few solutions to see what worked. 
Fortunately, there’s no penalty for wrong guesses, so you can try as many combinations as you want. 
Some stopped me cold for minutes at a time. 
If you’re stuck on a puzzle for a while, the game will give you an option to skip it, and occasionally you can get a hint. 
The game is backed by a calming, jazzy soundtrack that loops a single song over and over, and it pairs well with the game’s entirely black-and-white visuals. 
The whole vibe made me feel like some kind of noir gumshoe. 
But I also found that the slow drone could help when I was stuck on a particularly tricky puzzle; my mind would occasionally wander to the meandering music, and every once in a while, that idle thinking would lead me to a puzzle’s solution. 
In the end, I couldn’t solve everything. 
It took me about three hours to work my way through What’s the Password?, and I completed about 77 percent of the puzzles. 
But the game reminded me of the value of patience and a good night’s sleep; coming back in the morning with a fresh mind and coffee in hand, I usually had an easier time figuring things out. 
A lot of the fun of What’s the Password? 
was seeing what unexpected format would be thrown at me next, and that’s what gives the simple premise such depth. 
What’s the Password? 
is out now on PC via Steam, iOS, and Android. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.7%Jay Peters: 2.7%The Verge: 3.6%Confirmation Bias4.7%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.6%The Verge: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Jay Peters: 2.5%The Verge: 3.8%Availability Heuristic4.7%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.6%The Verge: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.3%The Verge: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Jay Peters: 0.9%The Verge: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias5.4%This article: 5.6%Jay Peters: 3.0%The Verge: 6.2%Framing Effect5.6%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.3%The Verge: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.4%The Verge: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.2%The Verge: 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 12.7%Jay Peters: 3.5%The Verge: 4.0%Optimism Bias12.7%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 2.2%The Verge: 2.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Jay Peters: 7.5%The Verge: 9.7%Negativity Bias2.1%This article: 1.6%Jay Peters: 1.1%The Verge: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias1.6%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.2%The Verge: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.2%The Verge: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.0%The Verge: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.2%The Verge: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 11.1%Jay Peters: 2.8%The Verge: 2.8%Halo Effect11.1%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.0%The Verge: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.0%The Verge: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.1%Jay Peters: 1.7%The Verge: 1.8%Recency Bias3.1%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.7%The Verge: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.0%The Verge: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.4%The Verge: 1.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.0%The Verge: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 4.0%The Verge: 4.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.3%The Verge: 1.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.5%The Verge: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 4.7%Jay Peters: 0.1%The Verge: 0.2%Circular Reasoning4.7%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 4.5%The Verge: 6.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.3%The Verge: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.0%The Verge: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 3.6%The Verge: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.7%The Verge: 1.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 19.1%Jay Peters: 1.8%The Verge: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)19.1%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.0%The Verge: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.9%The Verge: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.3%The Verge: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.3%The Verge: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 23.8%Jay Peters: 4.0%The Verge: 3.6%Anecdotal23.8%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.0%The Verge: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 12.9%Jay Peters: 2.2%The Verge: 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)12.9%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.0%The Verge: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.1%The Verge: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.1%The Verge: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.4%The Verge: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.0%The Verge: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 2.6%The Verge: 2.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 1.9%The Verge: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 53.6%Jay Peters: 8.8%The Verge: 10.8%Biased Writer Voice53.6%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.3%The Verge: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.0%The Verge: 1.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Peters: 0.0%The Verge: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Jay Peters: 5.3%The Verge: 4.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.4%

425 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.