Federal prosecutors to drop charges against alleged mastermind of $722 million crypto Ponzi scheme 34%

7/11/2026, 6:06:22 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Recency Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 135 hits. Analysis detected 1,227 faulty-reasoning hits from 549 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42% and a BS Rank of 34% (14,499 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 66.20% of the article peer group.

The Department of Justice is planning to drop charges against a Colorado man accused of running a cryptocurrency fraud that allegedly netted him $722 million. 
Matthew Goettsche and several others were indicted in 2019 over claims he defrauded investors with his crypto mining firm, BitClub Network. 
He rewarded investors for recruiting new members, prosecutors said, the classic structure of a Ponzi scheme. 
In a sharp reversal, the deputy attorney general's office in Washington ordered the New Jersey U.S. attorney's office to dismiss the case with prejudice, two people familiar with the matter told Bloomberg Law . 
The first public sign that the prosecution was no longer being pursued came Wednesday, when Goettsche's attorneys filed a motion informing the judge they had "reached an agreement in principle to resolve the pending charges." 
FBI SEIZES $8 BILLION IN CRYPTO AMID INTERCONTINENTAL ‘SCAM COMPOUND’ CRACKDOWN 
According to sources who spoke with Bloomberg Law, Goettsche assembled a team of lawyers who had connections to the Trump administration that could lobby for relief from the DOJ. 
Fox News Digital reached out to the DOJ for comment. 
Emily Covington, a DOJ spokesperson, denied that the decision to drop the charges had anything to with "any alleged pressure by Goettsche’s attorneys" in a statement to Bloomberg Law. 
She also said the DOJ routinely evaluates pending cases and that the government is in the process of recovering "a substantial amount owed to investors." 
This marks a stunning shift since February, when prosecutors sent the court a letter saying that a jury trial was necessary. 
TEXT JOB SCAM COST HIM $10K IN CRYPTO 
"The Indictment concerns a global fraudulent scheme based on false promises that the victims’ hundreds of millions of dollars in investments would be used to generate returns from cryptocurrency mining," prosecutors wrote in the letter, which was signed by then-Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. 
In 2015, when BitClub Network was just getting off the ground, Goettsche allegedly told his co-conspirators, "We are building this whole model on the backs of idiots," according to the indictment. 
Bitcoin mining is a process that requires "miners" to use computers to solve complicated math problems to be rewarded with newly minted bitcoin. 
MINNESOTA BANS CRYPTO ATMs AFTER SCAM SURGE 
BitClub Network, as others were doing at the time, purported to pool investors money together to buy hardware and computer chips to build a better mining system. 
The idea was to then distribute the profits. 
Prosecutors argued that BitClub Network reported fake profits and misled their investors. 
"Real stats on fake numbers," Goettsche said in a January 2015 message to a colleague that was included in the indictment. 
"We will slowly introduce real numbers." 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
The indictment, which charged Goettsche with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and selling unregistered securities, was returned during the first Trump administration, and three of Goettsche's co-defendants pleaded guilty. 
The second Trump administration has been much more friendly to crypto, and Donald Trump's family has its own crypto ventures. 
The House of Representatives also passed the Clarity Act last year, the first attempt by Congress to provide an updated framework to regulate crypto. 
Fox News Digital reached out to Goettsche's defense attorneys for comment. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.9%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Confirmation Bias14.9%This article: 11.8%FoxBusiness: 3.4%Anchoring Bias11.8%This article: 10.0%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Availability Heuristic10.0%This article: 7.8%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic7.8%This article: 6.4%FoxBusiness: 0.7%Hindsight Bias6.4%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 3.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 9.1%FoxBusiness: 12.9%Framing Effect9.1%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 1.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 8.9%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Status Quo Bias8.9%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 8.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 2.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 24.6%FoxBusiness: 7.9%Negativity Bias24.6%This article: 5.3%FoxBusiness: 4.5%Self-Serving Bias5.3%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 3.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 15.3%FoxBusiness: 2.3%Recency Bias15.3%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 20.2%FoxBusiness: 7.2%Appeal to Authority20.2%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 1.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.8%FoxBusiness: 6.3%Hasty Generalization3.8%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 11.5%FoxBusiness: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion11.5%This article: 8.0%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Begging the Question8.0%This article: 10.2%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.2%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 6.7%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Burden of Proof6.7%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 5.3%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Composition/Division5.3%This article: 1.5%FoxBusiness: 2.4%Anecdotal1.5%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.3%FoxBusiness: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.3%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.4%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Middle Ground4.4%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 3.6%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy3.6%This article: 10.9%FoxBusiness: 1.8%Unattributed Quote10.9%This article: 6.7%FoxBusiness: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection6.7%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 1.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 2.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.5%

549 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers27%attributed speech403writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageFox News Digital • 10 words • 0.0% coverageEmily Covington • 29 words • 0.0% coverageEmily Covington • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMatthew Goettsche • 21 words • 0.0% coverageMatthew Goettsche • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageFox News Digital • 11 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Todd Blanche

100%flagged-word coverage
44 attributed words30% of attributed speech92% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Unattributed Quote-14.9 ptsWriter: 14.9%Todd Blanche: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-7.7 ptsWriter: 7.7%Todd Blanche: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.0 ptsWriter: 2.0%Todd Blanche: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.