At The Great American State Fair, You Can Find A Dinosaur's Rib Cage. Unity Is Another Matter. 7%

By Gary Fields16%

6/28/2026, 3:00:50 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 103 hits. Analysis detected 698 faulty-reasoning hits from 674 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 23.7% and a BS Rank of 7% (19,683 of 21,166 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 93.00% of the article peer group.

WASHINGTON (AP)  A dinosaur rib cage. 
A 7,000-pound sandcastle made with Jersey Shore sand. 
Two rocking chairs in an unstaffed booth as well as a number of empty spaces. 
The fair kicked off this week and is a run by Freedom 250, an organization created by President Donald Trump to run his administration’s official events. 
Its creation caused tension with America250, a congressionally created group that was designed to plan the nation’s 250th anniversary. 
The event on the National Mall will run into July. 
Crowds came in small numbers early Friday, spending little time at security. 
The entryway led straight to a 110-foot tall Ferris wheel, the lone ride at the fair, and a smaller arch, similar to the ones that the Republican president has used to adorn other events. 
The consensus among people who were interviewed was that the fair was a great idea  and perhaps an opportunity missed. 
Familiar to anyone who has ever attended a fair were the goats, sheep and a calf whose mooing could be heard across the Mall, all courtesy of the Washington High School Future Farmers of America from Jefferson County, West Virginia. 
Baby chicks, resplendent in all of their downy softness, were a huge draw, and there was the promise of a cowboy performance with bucking broncos to highlight the rise of the American cowboy. 
Visitors were united by their enthusiasm for states to come together and show off their unique characters, famous natives, industries and history and geographical diversity. 
They were also drawn by a desire for a nonpartisan celebration of American unity. 
“There’s nice people, nice events, nice family events,” said Sharyn Bovat, who said she lived in Florida but has remained in the Washington area since having a heart attack this year. 
“Half the country is divided with the other half. 
I wish they would create a USA 250 for all the people. 
I’m tired of the politics.” 
She said the arch was the main thing that gave the event a political overtone. 
“It makes me think of Germany,” she said. 
The fair booths, all inside structures that resembled the neoclassical architecture of the nearby National Gallery of Art, offered snippets of Americana to visitors. 
Among the items representing Montana was a gigantic rib cage, a scaled-up version of apatosaurus, which is a cousin to the better-known brontosaurus. 
Virginia’s booth offered a journey through the state’s role in American history. 
For the District of Columbia, there was a huge banner for visitors to sign, along with a tree filled with cherry blossoms. 
South Carolina invited people to enjoy a putting green. 
Texas included a space capsule, a facade of the Alamo and a statue  Big Tex. 
The one place where there was a line outside was for Arizona’s exhibit, which had an interactive that allowed visitors to put themselves in terrain from the state. 
Most states participated, treating the fair almost like a tourism opportunity. 
But there was not full representation. 
Maine, Massachusetts and Pennsylvania opted to not send delegations, citing costs, scheduling or politicization concerns. 
Pennsylvania’s senators John Fetterman, a Democrat, and Dave McCormick, a Republican, said Saturday they had gotten together with several business trade organizations to “make sure the Keystone State would have a showcase worthy of its singular place in our nation’s history.” 
Some booths, including those for Hawaii and Alaska, were unstaffed. 
Hawaii’s did feature a couple of rocking chairs, which tired visitors put to good use. 
Alonzo Lewis Jr. and Kelly Domizio, from Rome, New York, took advantage to take a load off. 
“This was really pretty cool,” she said. 
“Been going to all the different states.” 
But her husband had a different view. 
“Was it necessary, I don’t think so,” Lewis said. 
“It feels forced. 
There’s so much separation.” 
Domizio said she remembered the bicentennial in 1976. 
“There was a sense of pride” and togetherness she said. 
“We are enjoying the day but it feels forced.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 1.0%AP: 3.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Gary Fields: 0.2%AP: 0.8%Anchoring Bias2.2%This article: 7.7%Gary Fields: 2.7%AP: 2.8%Availability Heuristic7.7%This article: 6.7%Gary Fields: 0.9%AP: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic6.7%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 0.6%AP: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 0.8%AP: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Gary Fields: 7.4%AP: 9.9%Framing Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 0.0%AP: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.8%Gary Fields: 1.0%AP: 0.3%Status Quo Bias1.8%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 0.0%AP: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.9%Gary Fields: 1.5%AP: 1.4%Optimism Bias9.9%This article: 2.1%Gary Fields: 0.7%AP: 2.4%Pessimism Bias2.1%This article: 15.3%Gary Fields: 8.6%AP: 13.5%Negativity Bias15.3%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 1.3%AP: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Gary Fields: 2.8%AP: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error3.9%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 0.0%AP: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Gary Fields: 0.6%AP: 2.2%In-Group Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 0.0%AP: 1.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Gary Fields: 0.9%AP: 1.4%Halo Effect2.2%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 0.4%AP: 0.7%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 0.0%AP: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.5%Gary Fields: 1.0%AP: 1.5%Recency Bias1.5%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 0.9%AP: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 0.0%AP: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 0.2%AP: 2.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 0.4%AP: 1.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.1%Gary Fields: 2.3%AP: 2.6%Appeal to Authority6.1%This article: 2.2%Gary Fields: 2.5%AP: 1.9%False Dilemma2.2%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 1.1%AP: 2.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 0.5%AP: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.5%Gary Fields: 3.8%AP: 6.5%Hasty Generalization6.5%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 0.0%AP: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 0.0%AP: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.8%Gary Fields: 2.4%AP: 6.2%Appeal to Emotion6.8%This article: 2.2%Gary Fields: 0.2%AP: 1.3%Begging the Question2.2%This article: 2.8%Gary Fields: 0.9%AP: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.8%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 0.0%AP: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 0.0%AP: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 0.0%AP: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 3.7%Gary Fields: 0.3%AP: 0.1%Composition/Division3.7%This article: 7.6%Gary Fields: 2.8%AP: 1.3%Anecdotal7.6%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 0.0%AP: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.1%Gary Fields: 0.3%AP: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.1%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 0.0%AP: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.0%Gary Fields: 0.9%AP: 0.1%Middle Ground1.0%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 0.0%AP: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 0.0%AP: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 0.0%AP: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 1.0%AP: 2.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 1.2%Gary Fields: 1.3%AP: 2.0%Quote-first Misdirection1.2%This article: 0.6%Gary Fields: 2.1%AP: 12.7%Biased Writer Voice0.6%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 0.0%AP: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 0.0%AP: 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 0.5%AP: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gary Fields: 0.0%AP: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

674 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers24%attributed speech510writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageSharyn Bovat • 31 words • 0.0% coverageSharyn Bovat • 9 words • 0.0% coverageSharyn Bovat • 12 words • 0.0% coverageSharyn Bovat • 5 words • 0.0% coverageSharyn Bovat • 15 words • 0.0% coverageSharyn Bovat • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Fetterman • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageAlonzo Lewis Jr. • 9 words • 0.0% coverageAlonzo Lewis Jr. • 3 words • 0.0% coverageAlonzo Lewis Jr. • 4 words • 0.0% coverageKelly Domizio • 8 words • 0.0% coverageKelly Domizio • 10 words • 0.0% coverageKelly Domizio • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Alonzo Lewis Jr.

100%flagged-word coverage
16 attributed words9.8% of attributed speech59% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Biased Writer Voice-0.8 ptsWriter: 0.8%Alonzo Lewis Jr.: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.