WWL Louisiana is making more anchor changes as Charisse Gibson heads to LA 47%

By Keith Spera67%

7/20/2026, 6:09:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 545 faulty-reasoning hits from 368 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48.3% and a BS Rank of 47% (11,806 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 53.90% of the article peer group.

More changes are coming at WWL Louisiana beyond the impending departure of evening news anchor Charisse Gibson. 
Doug Mouton, currently the local CBS affiliate’s sports director, is slated to be the new host of the WWL Louisiana Morning News. 
He'll officially move to the morning desk the week of Aug. 
24. 
Mouton, a Brother Martin High School and University of New Orleans graduate, has experience across the newsroom. 
He was WWL's Northshore bureau chief before being named sports director in 2012. 
He succeeded Jim Henderson in that role. 
Mouton is president of the Press Club of New Orleans. 
He won several awards during the 2026 Press Club Excellence in Journalism Awards Gala on Saturday. 
Walker’s morning news co-anchor, Brheanna Boudreaux, left WWL in June for a job in Houston. 
WWL plans to hire another co-anchor to host the morning show alongside Mouton. 
“We’re actively recruiting for a new anchor and look forward to making an announcement soon. 
We believe (Mouton’s) connection with the audience and on-air personality make him a natural fit to grow the morning show, while Brandon will move to an evening newscast, which we believe best match his strengths.” 
In a major change behind the cameras, WWL Louisiana news director Tyrianne “Nicole” Waivers has resigned. 
A New Orleans native and graduate of Edna Karr High School and Loyola University, Waivers previously worked as an executive news editor at WFAA, an ABC affiliate in Dallas that, like WWL, is owned by TEGNA. 
In January 2022, she became executive producer of WWL’s 10 p.m. newscast. 
She was promoted to the station’s news director in May 2023 following the retirement of Keith Esparros, who had been in that role for eight years. 
On July 13, Waivers, who was recently on maternity leave, sent an email to WWL staffers that read in part, "After much thought and prayer, I've decided it's time for my next chapter. 
I’ll be stepping away from my position as News Director here at WWL." 
"Thank you for challenging me, for trusting me. 
I'll be cheering you on from home, with a baby in one arm and WWL on the television. 
" 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.5%Keith Spera: 6.3%nola.com: 2.4%Confirmation Bias9.5%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 1.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Keith Spera: 1.4%nola.com: 2.6%Availability Heuristic4.3%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 9.5%Keith Spera: 4.6%nola.com: 4.4%Framing Effect9.5%This article: 4.9%Keith Spera: 1.6%nola.com: 0.8%Loss Aversion4.9%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 13.0%Keith Spera: 7.3%nola.com: 3.9%Optimism Bias13.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Keith Spera: 1.4%nola.com: 3.7%Negativity Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 16.6%Keith Spera: 20.4%nola.com: 3.0%Halo Effect16.6%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.6%Keith Spera: 1.5%nola.com: 1.1%Recency Bias4.6%This article: 7.1%Keith Spera: 2.4%nola.com: 0.3%Primacy Effect7.1%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.4%Keith Spera: 4.8%nola.com: 3.4%Appeal to Authority14.4%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 2.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 16.6%Keith Spera: 12.1%nola.com: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion16.6%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 3.2%nola.com: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 7.1%Keith Spera: 2.4%nola.com: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.1%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 2.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 22.6%Keith Spera: 8.9%nola.com: 2.2%Unattributed Quote22.6%This article: 4.1%Keith Spera: 1.4%nola.com: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection4.1%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 2.4%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Spera: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 9.5%Keith Spera: 3.2%nola.com: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…9.5%

368 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker20%attributed speech296writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageTyrianne “Nicole” Waivers • 33 words • 100.0% coverageTyrianne “Nicole” Waivers • 13 words • 0.0% coverageTyrianne “Nicole” Waivers • 8 words • 0.0% coverageTyrianne “Nicole” Waivers • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverage
82%flagged-word coverage
72 attributed words100% of attributed speech64% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Unattributed Quote+28.9 ptsWriter: 16.9%Tyrianne “Nicole” Waivers: 45.8%45.8%Attempt to Sell a Product -11.8 ptsWriter: 11.8%Tyrianne “Nicole” Waivers: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-5.1 ptsWriter: 5.1%Tyrianne “Nicole” Waivers: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.