L.A. TACO85%

Daily Memo: ICE Keeps Targeting People at Rancho Cucamonga Court 76%

By Izzy Ramirez76% Erwin Recinos0%

4/11/2026, 12:12:13 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 196 hits. Analysis detected 2,012 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,094 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 67.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (5,390 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 75.40% of the article peer group.

It’s been another week of ICE raids, and here at L.A. 
TACO, we have tallied a minimum of 32 people being taken during various types of enforcement in Southern California. 
ICE agents continue to target individuals being released from jails. 
This includes people who only served minor incidents that resulted in misdemeanors or infractions, as well as courts, ISAP offices, and the occasional targeted kidnapping. 
Today is Friday, April 10, and it is day 309 of the ICE siege in Los Angeles. 
Thank you to the California Community Foundation for their continued support of the Daily Memo. 
Yesterday, ICE agents have once again returned to the Superior Court in Rancho Cucamonga where they kidnapped three people. 
The community watchers and rapid responders were on the ground documenting the scene and trying their best to provide support. 
This court on Haven and Foothill has been the target of ICE for quite some time, even when Border Patrol was raiding Southern California, ICE would make frequent stops at this court. 
They also returned today and took an additional person. 
Yesterday, they were also taking people once again from jails in the 805. 
They took one person from the Santa Barbara County North Jail, one from the Santa Barbara County Jail, and two people from a jail in Lompoc. 
They were also spotted in Jurupa Valley taking two people, and sightings in San Diego, and Santa Ana. 
Here in Los Angeles, another traffic collision occurred during an ICE chase. 
According to reporting by the Crescenta Valley Weekly, CHP responded to a traffic collision that occurred south of the Ocean View Blvd on-ramp to the 210 freeway. 
A vehicle lost control and hit a pole on 4131 Ocean View Blvd while fleeing from ICE agents. 
The driver ran off afterwards. 
ICE agents conducted a traffic stop on the individual on Foothill Blvd near Lowell Ave. 
Today, ICE agents were in Agoura Hills and two people were taken. 
They also returned to the San Luis Obispo County Jail, but were pressured out thanks to a collective effort of the local community watchers. 
No one was taken. 
ICE agents were also in the city of Riverside where they took one person from the Veseda apartment complex, and also took one person in El Cajon in San Diego county. 
While the Border Patrol roving raids have halted in Los Angeles, ICE has been, and is still around. 
For the last several weeks I’ve been tracking a minimum of at least 30 people being taken every week. 
This week, unfortunately, a very dear and close family friend of mine was taken during a check-in in the city of Santa Ana. 
Please stay safe, and stay alert. 
~ Izzy Ramirez 
We break down immigration raids and related news in Southern California. 
Below, you'll find links and references to everything discussed in the video, allowing you to take a closer look at each topic. 
If you appreciate reporting like this, please consider becoming a member, buying some merch, or dropping a dime in our fundraiser so we can continue bringing you this vital information. 
RAIDS 
[Thursday. 
April 9. 
Day 308.] 
Van Nuys: At the James C. 
Corman Federal Building, around 9:15 a.m. 
Community watchers watched a caravan of plateless vehicles leaving the area. 
Santa Maria: At the Santa Barbara County North Jail on 2301 Black Rd, around 7:39 a.m. 
ICE agents were present at the courthouse in the morning. 
805 Rapid Response confirmed that one person was taken after release. 
Rancho Cucamonga: At the Superior Courthouse on 8303 Haven Ave, around 7:53 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. 
Community watch teams confirmed that ICE agents returned to the courthouse once again and kidnapped three individuals after their hearings. 
Santa Barbara: At the Santa Barbara County Jail on 4436 Calle Real, around 7:09 a.m. 
Unlicensed vehicles spotted leaving the jail by community watchers. 
805 Rapid Response confirmed that one person was taken after release. 
Lompoc: At the Federal Correctional Institution Lompoc on 3600 Guard Rd. 
805 Rapid Response confirmed with L.A. 
TACO that they observed ICE take two people as they were released from the facility. 
Jurupa Valley: Near Limonte, 7:28 a.m. 
ICE activity in the area all pulled to the side of the road as seen by community watchers. 
At least two people were taken. 
San Diego: On Spring St. 
A community watcher documented an ICE agent who was in the community. 
The ICE agent eventually drove away. 
Santa Ana: On Raitt St and Edinger Ave, around 6:30 a.m. 
A confirmed ICE vehicle was seen in the area. 
La Crescenta: According to reporting by the Crescenta Valley Weekly, the California Highway Patrol (CHP) responded to a traffic collision that occurred south of the Ocean View Blvd on-ramp to the 210 freeway. 
A vehicle lost control and hit a pole on 4131 Ocean View Blvd while fleeing from ICE agents, the driver ran off afterwards. 
ICE agents conducted a traffic stop prior on Foothill Blvd near Lowell Ave. 
[Friday. 
April 10. 
Day 309.] 
Agoura Hills: On Thousand Oaks Blvd and Kanan Rd, around 8:15 a.m. 
ICE agents were seen outside of an apartment complex, kidnapping at least two individuals. 
San Luis Obispo: On 1585 Kansas Ave, around 11:34 am. 
ICE agents attempted to stage in the parking lot, but were met with community watchers who pressured them out of the lobby. 
Rancho Cucamonga: At the Superior Court on 8303 Haven Ave, around 9:40 a.m. 
ICE agents have once again returned to the courthouse. 
Riverside: At the Veseda apartment complex on 3390 Country Village Road, around 7:12 a.m. 
Community watch teams and rapid responders confirmed that ICE agents were seen in the area taking at least one person. 
San Diego: On 5502 Adelaide Ave. 
Community watchers spotted an ICE agent scouting the neighborhood for the fifth time. 
El Cajon: On 400 N Second St. 
Federal agents were seen in a parking lot. 
No specification of the exact location. 
ICE agents took at least one person. 
AT L.A. 
TACO 
Scoop: City of L.A. 
Facing Over 120 Claims For Damages Related To Anti-ICE Protests Amid Financial Crisis 
IN OTHER ICE-RELATED NEWS 
Evening ICE activity at the Ventura jail release lobby ends badly for federal agents 
Judge slams Border Patrol raids in Kern and Sacramento 
While detained at Adelanto ICE facility, 51 yr old Jose had a finger bit off by another detainee and received no medical care 
The White House boasts about asylum grant rates reaching single digits 
ICE facilities’ medical staff failed to diagnose critical illnesses and misdiagnosed patients 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.7%Izzy Ramirez: 3.9%L.A. TACO: 3.9%Confirmation Bias7.7%This article: 7.0%Izzy Ramirez: 0.7%L.A. TACO: 0.8%Anchoring Bias7.0%This article: 12.8%Izzy Ramirez: 5.3%L.A. TACO: 4.1%Availability Heuristic12.8%This article: 5.7%Izzy Ramirez: 0.5%L.A. TACO: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic5.7%This article: 0.0%Izzy Ramirez: 0.2%L.A. TACO: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Izzy Ramirez: 0.7%L.A. TACO: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias2.0%This article: 9.3%Izzy Ramirez: 17.8%L.A. TACO: 11.5%Framing Effect9.3%This article: 0.0%Izzy Ramirez: 0.4%L.A. TACO: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.6%Izzy Ramirez: 0.3%L.A. TACO: 0.6%Status Quo Bias1.6%This article: 0.0%Izzy Ramirez: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Izzy Ramirez: 0.6%L.A. TACO: 2.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Izzy Ramirez: 1.0%L.A. TACO: 0.9%Pessimism Bias3.0%This article: 17.9%Izzy Ramirez: 19.4%L.A. TACO: 11.3%Negativity Bias17.9%This article: 5.2%Izzy Ramirez: 0.6%L.A. TACO: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Izzy Ramirez: 0.6%L.A. TACO: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Izzy Ramirez: 0.2%L.A. TACO: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Izzy Ramirez: 3.9%L.A. TACO: 4.9%In-Group Bias1.8%This article: 0.0%Izzy Ramirez: 1.9%L.A. TACO: 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Izzy Ramirez: 1.3%L.A. TACO: 6.0%Halo Effect1.8%This article: 0.0%Izzy Ramirez: 0.5%L.A. TACO: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Izzy Ramirez: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.7%Izzy Ramirez: 1.0%L.A. TACO: 1.0%Recency Bias6.7%This article: 0.0%Izzy Ramirez: 0.3%L.A. TACO: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Izzy Ramirez: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 1.0%Izzy Ramirez: 1.1%L.A. TACO: 1.2%Ad Hominem1.0%This article: 0.0%Izzy Ramirez: 0.2%L.A. TACO: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.5%Izzy Ramirez: 3.4%L.A. TACO: 3.6%Appeal to Authority13.5%This article: 1.6%Izzy Ramirez: 0.6%L.A. TACO: 1.1%False Dilemma1.6%This article: 0.0%Izzy Ramirez: 0.7%L.A. TACO: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Izzy Ramirez: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.2%Izzy Ramirez: 3.6%L.A. TACO: 5.8%Hasty Generalization6.2%This article: 0.0%Izzy Ramirez: 0.2%L.A. TACO: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.7%Izzy Ramirez: 0.6%L.A. TACO: 1.3%Bandwagon2.7%This article: 10.0%Izzy Ramirez: 14.1%L.A. TACO: 10.8%Appeal to Emotion10.0%This article: 0.9%Izzy Ramirez: 0.9%L.A. TACO: 0.9%Begging the Question0.9%This article: 12.0%Izzy Ramirez: 2.3%L.A. TACO: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.0%This article: 0.0%Izzy Ramirez: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.5%Izzy Ramirez: 0.9%L.A. TACO: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.5%This article: 0.0%Izzy Ramirez: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Izzy Ramirez: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 9.3%Izzy Ramirez: 7.8%L.A. TACO: 5.7%Anecdotal9.3%This article: 0.0%Izzy Ramirez: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 16.5%Izzy Ramirez: 2.8%L.A. TACO: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)16.5%This article: 0.0%Izzy Ramirez: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Izzy Ramirez: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Izzy Ramirez: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Izzy Ramirez: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Izzy Ramirez: 0.4%L.A. TACO: 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.4%Izzy Ramirez: 2.5%L.A. TACO: 1.4%Unattributed Quote3.4%This article: 2.1%Izzy Ramirez: 0.8%L.A. TACO: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection2.1%This article: 14.9%Izzy Ramirez: 9.9%L.A. TACO: 8.7%Biased Writer Voice14.9%This article: 3.8%Izzy Ramirez: 1.8%L.A. TACO: 2.0%Indoctrination3.8%This article: 0.0%Izzy Ramirez: 5.2%L.A. TACO: 2.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Izzy Ramirez: 0.4%L.A. TACO: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Izzy Ramirez: 1.4%L.A. TACO: 2.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.7%

1094 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers9.7%attributed speech988writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageCalifornia Community Foundation • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageCrescenta Valley Weekly • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageIzzy Ramirez • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverage805 Rapid Response • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverage805 Rapid Response • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverage805 Rapid Response • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageCrescenta Valley Weekly • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
60 attributed words57% of attributed speech78% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Biased Writer Voice-16.5 ptsWriter: 16.5%Crescenta Valley Weekly: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-4.3 ptsWriter: 4.3%Crescenta Valley Weekly: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-3.7 ptsWriter: 3.7%Crescenta Valley Weekly: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.0 ptsWriter: 3.0%Crescenta Valley Weekly: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.3 ptsWriter: 2.3%Crescenta Valley Weekly: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.