STLPR0%

Tornado-damaged St. Louis Public Library branches reopen with new resources 

By Katie Grawitch0%

5/19/2026, 10:00:00 AM

BS Summary: The article has not yet been analyzed.

Two St. 
Louis Public Library locations are reopening this week, a year after they were battered by a deadly tornado. 
The Julia Davis branch in Penrose and the Cabanne branch in Academy opened Monday after receiving repairs for fallen ceilings and water damage. 
The storm tore the HVAC unit off the roof of the Julia Davis Library and blew a large piece of wood through one of the cinder block walls. 
The rain that came a few days later flooded the building and destroyed the floors. 
John Newcomer has managed the location since 2012. 
He said the water damage compounded the already costly structural repair costs. 
“This was not just some water leaks  this was pure devastation,” Newcomer said. 
“We [wanted] to get open as soon as possible, but in order to do so, we had to remediate the entire building." 
The revamped branch will now rent tools to tornado-impacted residents and help visitors digitize old tapes and photo negatives. 
It will also see the return of native plants to its shade garden, which was destroyed in the storm. 
Also returning is the library’s computer lab, which provides internet access to many patrons. 
The building also houses recording studios, 3D printers and a Cricut cutting machine. 
Nicholas Allen has been coming to the Julia Davis branch since he was a child. 
He said he’s grateful to have a space to make music again. 
“I’m going to be here a whole lot more,” Allen said. 
"This is my home away from home. 
This day is going to be the first of many.” 
Newcomer said there’s been high demand for the location to reopen. 
“I feel like I'm at a family reunion,” Newcomer said. 
“It's just fun, I think, for everyone to be back home.” 
Repairs at the Cabanne branch in the Academy neighborhood include restoration of a clerestory ceiling from 1907 with original windows and crown molding. 
Carrie Haman has worked at the Cabanne location since 2020. 
She was there when the tornado hit and remembers sheltering in the janitor’s closet on the lower level while the storm blew over. 
“When we got the all clear, we came upstairs, and we could see that the drop ceiling around the customer service desk and the lights up there had fallen in,” Haman said. 
“I don't think I realized how bad it was. 
To see this community just devastated was really difficult.” 
Haman said it felt surreal to be back in the building. 
“To be here for the community because they've lost so much, as they go through the process of rebuilding, means a great deal to me and to my staff,” Haman said. 
There’s still work to be done at both locations. 
The library system plans to install two new chandeliers in the clerestory ceiling of Cabanne Library, and Newcomer said the Julia Davis location will have solar panels installed on the roof in the next month. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 1.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Katie Grawitch: 2.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic6.9%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 8.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 2.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.8%Katie Grawitch: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 22.6%Katie Grawitch: 4.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias22.6%This article: 1.8%Katie Grawitch: 2.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias1.8%This article: 6.5%Katie Grawitch: 8.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias6.5%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 2.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 10.7%Katie Grawitch: 3.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias10.7%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Katie Grawitch: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect3.4%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.2%Katie Grawitch: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.0%Katie Grawitch: 3.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization2.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 21.2%Katie Grawitch: 6.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion21.2%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 2.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 21.4%Katie Grawitch: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal21.4%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 2.8%Katie Grawitch: 2.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice2.8%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 2.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 20.8%Katie Grawitch: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…20.8%

496 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers49%attributed speech253writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Newcomer • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Newcomer • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Newcomer • 14 words • 100.0% coverageJohn Newcomer • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageNicholas Allen • 12 words • 0.0% coverageNicholas Allen • 11 words • 0.0% coverageNicholas Allen • 7 words • 0.0% coverageNicholas Allen • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Newcomer • 11 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Newcomer • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Newcomer • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageCarrie Haman • 23 words • 0.0% coverageCarrie Haman • 32 words • 0.0% coverageCarrie Haman • 9 words • 0.0% coverageCarrie Haman • 9 words • 0.0% coverageCarrie Haman • 11 words • 0.0% coverageCarrie Haman • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Carrie Haman

100%flagged-word coverage
115 attributed words47% of attributed speech43% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -32.0 ptsWriter: 32.0%Carrie Haman: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.