The ocean has shielded us from the worst of climate change. Now it is running a fever 54%

By Karina Von Schuckmann0%

6/17/2026, 3:00:28 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 77% saturation with 630 hits. Analysis detected 2,372 faulty-reasoning hits from 818 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 52.5% and a BS Rank of 54% (10,077 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 54.00% of the article peer group.

The ocean is running a fever. 
In 2025, the number of days of marine heatwaves  prolonged spells when the sea turns abnormally, dangerously warm  was more than triple what it was in the early 1990s. 
These are not abstract statistics. 
A severe and persistent marine heatwave bleaches coral reefs, strips away the kelp forests that shelter young fish, empties fishing grounds and  if occurring frequently  can tip whole ecosystems past the point of recovery. 
It scrambles the chemistry the ocean lives by, its acidity, its oxygen, the carbon it trades with the air, and can feed fiercer weather on land. 
For the coastal communities whose food and livelihoods come from the sea, the harm is immediate and personal. 
I have spent my career studying where the heat from climate change actually goes. 
The answer, overwhelmingly, is the sea. 
The ocean has absorbed more than 90% of the excess heat that human activity has trapped on Earth, quietly buffering those of us on land from the full force of warming. 
For decades, that made it our greatest and most uncomplaining ally. 
Ocean warming and more frequent and intense marine heatwaves are signs that the buffer is straining. 
The heat we have poured into the ocean is beginning to surface as harm. 
More frequent and intense marine heatwaves are just one of many new warning lights in this year’s Indicators of Global Climate Change (IGCC) report, the annual health check on the climate system compiled by more than 70 researchers from more than 50 institutions worldwide in the years between the next official UN assessment in 2028. 
But the climate system is changing in ways we can measure every year, and the single most revealing measurement is one most people have never heard of. 
It is called the Earth’s energy imbalance, and it is the closest thing we have to a master gauge of climate change: the gap between the energy reaching us from the sun and the energy the planet manages to radiate back out to space. 
In a stable climate, the two are roughly equal. 
However, several things are now prising them apart. 
By far the largest is the greenhouse gases humans keep adding, which thicken the atmosphere’s insulating blanket and trap heat that would otherwise escape. 
But they are not the whole story. 
As we clean up the dirty air pollution of the past, we are also losing the faint reflective haze it cast, letting more sunlight through. 
As the planet heats, it triggers feedback that amplifies warming. 
Bright, reflective ice giving way to dark, heat-absorbing ocean, cloud changes that tend to leave the Earth absorbing more energy than before and warming soils and waters releasing greenhouse gases of their own. 
Together, greenhouse gas emissions and this feedback are tipping the scales. 
Far less energy is now leaving than coming in, and the imbalance has more than doubled since the late 20th century. 
The Earth is, quite literally, out of balance, storing heat faster and faster. 
This is the engine behind nearly everything else the report records: rising temperatures, melting ice, fiercer extremes, and the intensifying marine heatwaves now scarring the ocean. 
The latest findings estimate that human-induced warming has reached approximately 1.37C above pre-industrial levels 
The other indicators in this IGCC report build a fuller picture of how this growing energy imbalance is fuelling impacts for people around the globe. 
The rate of sea-level rise has more than doubled in recent decades, and it continues to accelerate. 
In 2025, we passed a new record of 23cm of rise since 1901, which is pushing floodwaters further into low-lying coastlines and raising the floor of every tide and every storm. 
And this is what troubles me most: the very ability of scientists and policymakers to track these changes is now under threat. 
What we know about the ocean and Earth’s energy imbalance rests on a sophisticated network of sensors kept in waters across the globe and satellites. 
Last month, the scaling back of this work was announced: four of five monitoring sites across the Pacific and Atlantic are set to be closed, and equipment is already being pulled from the water. 
Other funding is under similar pressure. 
At the precise moment we most need to see clearly, we are turning off the lights. 
But paying attention is not the same as looking on helplessly. 
Thanks to this year’s IGCC report, we understand better than ever how human activity is pulling the climate further out of balance, and we know it lies within our power to ease it. 
Nearly every indicator of climate change is flashing red, but citizens, businesses and policymakers still hold the tools available to bring the planet back into balance. 
Karina Von Schuckmann is an IGCC author and senior adviser of Mercator Ocean International 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 19.4%Karina Von Schuckmann: 4.9%the Guardian: 3.7%Confirmation Bias19.4%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.9%the Guardian: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Karina Von Schuckmann: 1.8%the Guardian: 3.1%Availability Heuristic3.8%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 10.9%Karina Von Schuckmann: 3.1%the Guardian: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias10.9%This article: 12.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 5.6%the Guardian: 6.1%Framing Effect12.0%This article: 10.8%Karina Von Schuckmann: 3.8%the Guardian: 0.6%Loss Aversion10.8%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.6%Karina Von Schuckmann: 5.0%the Guardian: 2.5%Optimism Bias8.6%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 2.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 34.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 15.2%the Guardian: 10.4%Negativity Bias34.0%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%Karina Von Schuckmann: 1.6%the Guardian: 3.2%Halo Effect6.5%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.8%Karina Von Schuckmann: 5.3%the Guardian: 1.2%Recency Bias8.8%This article: 3.3%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.8%the Guardian: 0.4%Primacy Effect3.3%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 2.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 17.2%Karina Von Schuckmann: 8.5%the Guardian: 3.8%Appeal to Authority17.2%This article: 2.2%Karina Von Schuckmann: 1.0%the Guardian: 1.7%False Dilemma2.2%This article: 2.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.5%the Guardian: 1.1%Slippery Slope2.0%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.4%Karina Von Schuckmann: 1.1%the Guardian: 6.3%Hasty Generalization4.4%This article: 6.7%Karina Von Schuckmann: 1.7%the Guardian: 0.2%Red Herring6.7%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 12.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 8.4%the Guardian: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion12.0%This article: 0.6%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.2%the Guardian: 0.9%Begging the Question0.6%This article: 12.2%Karina Von Schuckmann: 3.1%the Guardian: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.2%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 3.2%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.8%the Guardian: 0.4%Composition/Division3.2%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 18.7%Karina Von Schuckmann: 4.7%the Guardian: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)18.7%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.2%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.8%the Guardian: 0.1%Middle Ground3.2%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.9%Karina Von Schuckmann: 1.5%the Guardian: 1.6%Unattributed Quote5.9%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 77.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 21.0%the Guardian: 10.4%Biased Writer Voice77.0%This article: 6.7%Karina Von Schuckmann: 5.3%the Guardian: 1.8%Indoctrination6.7%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

818 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker1.7%attributed speech804writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 55 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageKarina Von Schuckmann • 14 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Karina Von Schuckmann

100%flagged-word coverage
14 attributed words100% of attributed speech97% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+95.8 ptsWriter: 4.2%Karina Von Schuckmann: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-78.4 ptsWriter: 78.4%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-6.8 ptsWriter: 6.8%Karina Von Schuckmann: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.