The Blaze86%

The small mercy of a pressed pillowcase 10%

By Peter Rosenberger43%

8/2/2026, 3:30:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 152 hits. Analysis detected 920 faulty-reasoning hits from 794 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 20.1% and a BS Rank of 10% (25,397 of 27,949 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 90.90% of the article peer group.

I enjoy ironing. 
Before you summon men in white coats carrying large butterfly nets, let me explain. 
My mother taught all of us to iron. 
My father was a military man who expected his children never to leave the house wrinkled or rumpled. 
He certainly never did. 
Caregivers live among things we cannot control, repair, or explain. 
Ironing allows me to direct some of that tension toward something useful and within reach. 
For years, ironing was simply practical. 
Dry-cleaning bills add up, and we now live more than 50 miles from the nearest cleaner. 
Over time, however, the chore became something more. 
For four decades, I have watched my wife endure extreme chronic pain, scores of operations, and more months in hospital rooms than I care to count. 
During those stays, I noticed something small but measurable: Gracie rested better when the bed had fresh linens. 
Clean, tightly drawn sheets and a fresh pillowcase did not relieve her pain or repair her body. 
They settled her. 
They softened the edges of a brutal experience. 
Hospitals necessarily focus on medications, procedures, vital signs, and lab results. 
Fresh linens can slide down the list. 
After hospital stays dating to the Reagan administration, I learned where the clean linens were kept and helped myself. 
If a sheet touched the floor or a pillowcase looked tired, I replaced it and dropped the used linens into the nylon laundry bag found in every room. 
The improvement was never dramatic. 
Fresh sheets did not erase Gracie’s pain. 
But her body relaxed, and her breathing settled. 
In a room governed by suffering, even modest comfort deserved attention. 
One day at home, I saw the sheets in a basket beside the ironing board and thought, “Why not?” 
By the way, caregiving involves a great deal of laundry. 
Just saying. 
I began ironing Gracie’s pillowcases and praying over them. 
Then I tackled the sheets, including the fitted ones, which should qualify as an advanced degree. 
I pressed her nightgowns and hung them where she could reach them from her wheelchair. 
I ironed her blouses so they would be smooth and ready to wear. 
With a Bluetooth earpiece, I return listeners’ calls, conduct media interviews, take audio courses, and talk theology with pastors who tutor me  all while ironing. 
Laundry does not steal time from my work. 
It helps me focus. 
RELATED: The new kid in the waiting room 
Tuned_In/Getty Images 
None of this solves the larger problem. 
I cannot take away Gracie’s pain, reverse the damage to her body, or make her legs grow back. 
But I can make the bed. 
When I cannot bring order to the crisis, I can bring order to the linen closet. 
A pressed pillowcase will not cure chronic pain, but it may help someone rest while enduring it. 
Scripture presses the matter further. 
At the Transfiguration, Christ’s clothes became “shining, exceedingly white, like snow, such as no launderer on earth can whiten them” (Mark 9:3). 
Paul writes that Christ will present the church to Himself as “a glorious church, not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing” (Ephesians 5:27). 
Evidently, God likes clean laundry. 
But the spotless bride will not stand before Christ because she finally scrubbed away every stain and pressed out every wrinkle herself. 
She will stand there because Christ loved her and gave Himself for her. 
He does what no launderer on earth can do. 
He cleanses His people and clothes them in a righteousness they did not produce. 
For those of us facing stains we cannot remove and damage we cannot undo, that is no small promise. 
Every piece of laundry I press reminds me of that greater work. 
Heat and pressure smooth the fabric beneath my hands. 
Yet even the crispest sheet will wrinkle again. 
The pillowcase will be soiled. 
The hamper will fill. 
By next week, I will repeat the work. 
Christ’s cleansing does not fail. 
His atoning work does not need repeating. 
RELATED: How a psychic, New Age hippie led me to Catholicism 
Roger Hutchings/In Pictures Ltd. 
/Corbis/Getty Images 
One day, there will be no nylon bags filled with dirty hospital linens carrying the evidence of another person’s suffering. 
There will be no hospitals. 
The redeemed will stand clothed in white, in the brilliant righteousness of Christ. 
Nothing will stain it. 
Nothing will wrinkle it. 
Until then, suffering remains, and so does laundry. 
Each time I unfold the ironing board, I am reminded that the small relief I can offer points beyond itself to the complete redemption Christ has promised. 
One day, the ironing board will be put away forever. 
Until then, with a nod to the apostle Paul, I press on. 
And before you ask, I iron only for Gracie. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.6%Peter Rosenberger: 3.1%Blaze Media: 5.0%Confirmation Bias11.6%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.8%Blaze Media: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 2.9%Blaze Media: 2.9%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 2.6%Peter Rosenberger: 1.4%Blaze Media: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic2.6%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.7%Blaze Media: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 1.2%Blaze Media: 8.8%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.5%Blaze Media: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 1.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect1.0%This article: 12.5%Peter Rosenberger: 2.3%Blaze Media: 1.5%Optimism Bias12.5%This article: 4.5%Peter Rosenberger: 1.2%Blaze Media: 1.6%Pessimism Bias4.5%This article: 8.9%Peter Rosenberger: 1.6%Blaze Media: 9.2%Negativity Bias8.9%This article: 1.1%Peter Rosenberger: 0.6%Blaze Media: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias1.1%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.6%Blaze Media: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 1.8%Blaze Media: 2.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.1%Blaze Media: 1.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 4.5%Blaze Media: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.9%Peter Rosenberger: 0.6%Blaze Media: 1.0%Recency Bias0.9%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.0%Blaze Media: 2.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.6%Blaze Media: 1.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.2%Peter Rosenberger: 2.2%Blaze Media: 3.2%Appeal to Authority14.2%This article: 2.6%Peter Rosenberger: 1.7%Blaze Media: 2.3%False Dilemma2.6%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.7%Blaze Media: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.6%Peter Rosenberger: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.6%This article: 5.5%Peter Rosenberger: 7.0%Blaze Media: 7.7%Hasty Generalization5.5%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.2%Peter Rosenberger: 3.2%Blaze Media: 7.9%Appeal to Emotion7.2%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.6%Blaze Media: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.3%Peter Rosenberger: 0.6%Blaze Media: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.3%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 3.4%Peter Rosenberger: 0.8%Blaze Media: 0.3%Composition/Division3.4%This article: 5.7%Peter Rosenberger: 3.1%Blaze Media: 2.5%Anecdotal5.7%This article: 2.8%Peter Rosenberger: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.2%No True Scotsman2.8%This article: 0.6%Peter Rosenberger: 0.3%Blaze Media: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.6%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.3%Peter Rosenberger: 0.9%Blaze Media: 2.5%Unattributed Quote3.3%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.3%Blaze Media: 2.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 4.3%Peter Rosenberger: 4.1%Blaze Media: 9.3%Biased Writer Voice4.3%This article: 19.1%Peter Rosenberger: 3.2%Blaze Media: 3.9%Indoctrination19.1%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.6%Blaze Media: 6.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Rosenberger: 0.0%Blaze Media: 2.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

794 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.