Security guard’s ‘heroic’ actions saved others in San Diego mosque attack, officials say 5%

By Hannah Fry49% Karen Garcia60%

5/19/2026, 2:35:55 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.8% saturation with 137 hits. Analysis detected 1,187 faulty-reasoning hits from 601 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 19.1% and a BS Rank of 5% (20,977 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 95.80% of the article peer group.

SAN DIEGO  The Islamic Center of San Diego is mourning three people killed in Monday’s attack, including a security guard praised by police for his actions. 
San Diego Police Chief Scott Wahl said the security guard who was inside the mosque was “able to minimize the situation to the front area of the mosque” and saved lives. 
“His actions were heroic,” he said. 
On Tuesday, he was identified as Amin Abdullah. 
The mosque honored him in a Facebook post, calling him “a courageous man who put himself on the line of the safety of others, who even in his last moments did not stop protecting our community.” 
Wahl credited Abdullah and others at the center with distracting the attackers and giving people at the center the chance to seek shelter. 
Abdullah called out on his walkie talkie for the school to be locked down. 
He shot one of the attackers, but he was wearing protective armor. 
On Tuesday, the entrance of the Islamic Center of San Diego was blocked with police tape, and a man stood outside the black iron gate, cradling his head in his hands while he wept. 
Abdullah was his friend. 
“He was a good man,” the man screamed toward the entrance but at no one in particular. 
He declined to provide his name. 
Others echoed those feelings. 
“He wanted to defend the innocent so he decided to become a security guard,” a family friend, Shaykh Uthman Ibn Farooq, told the Associated Press. 
The Islamic Center of San Diego is one of the largest mosques in San Diego and attracts worshippers from across the region. 
Inside are classrooms, an office, praying halls, a multipurpose room, a library, a kitchen and a grocery store where kids frequently buy snacks after school. 
The man who ran the grocery store, Mansoor Kaziha, and Nadir Awad, the husband of one of the school’s teachers were also killed, according to mosque members. 
Suzan Hamideh was trying to come to terms with what unfolded at the mosque she’d been visiting for decades. 
Right now, she said, she’s angry  at the loss of life, by the fact that the children will live with this trauma for the rest of their lives and by what she called the rampant misunderstanding of the Muslim religion that she suspects led to the violence. 
“Why should this be happening to begin with? 
And then in schools and places of worship. 
There is so much hatred,” she said. 
“It needs to change, and it starts with educating people about Islam. 
It’s a religion of love and peace.” 
Hamideh said she’d heard from those inside that, as soon as the shooters entered the house of worship, the security guard radioed to the rest of the staff that there was an active shooter. 
This gave teachers a chance to lock their classrooms, which house students in kindergarten through third grade, she said. 
Odai Shanah, 9, was sitting inside his third-grade class at the Islamic Center of San Diego when the shooting started. 
He wasn’t sure what the sound was at first. 
He assumed it was a tree branch snapping in the wind and hitting the ground. 
He hid in the classroom closet with the rest of his class until the SWAT team arrived, kicking down the door and instructing the students to file out with their hands up. 
The students walked out past the bodies of those killed, his family said. 
“We saw a bunch of bad stuff,” Odai said. 
“I felt scared. 
My legs were shaking.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.0%Hannah Fry: 2.2%Daily Pilot: 2.9%Confirmation Bias7.0%This article: 2.0%Hannah Fry: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 1.2%Anchoring Bias2.0%This article: 18.3%Hannah Fry: 5.8%Daily Pilot: 3.5%Availability Heuristic18.3%This article: 9.0%Hannah Fry: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic9.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 1.7%Daily Pilot: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.7%Hannah Fry: 6.1%Daily Pilot: 7.5%Framing Effect7.7%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.0%Hannah Fry: 1.7%Daily Pilot: 3.6%Optimism Bias2.0%This article: 9.3%Hannah Fry: 1.6%Daily Pilot: 1.4%Pessimism Bias9.3%This article: 22.8%Hannah Fry: 9.2%Daily Pilot: 7.8%Negativity Bias22.8%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Hannah Fry: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error4.2%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.2%Hannah Fry: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 1.6%In-Group Bias7.2%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 1.3%Daily Pilot: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 16.5%Hannah Fry: 3.8%Daily Pilot: 5.1%Halo Effect16.5%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 1.5%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 17.6%Hannah Fry: 6.2%Daily Pilot: 4.9%Appeal to Authority17.6%This article: 1.3%Hannah Fry: 1.6%Daily Pilot: 1.2%False Dilemma1.3%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.2%Hannah Fry: 3.1%Daily Pilot: 4.4%Hasty Generalization9.2%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.7%Hannah Fry: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Bandwagon0.7%This article: 11.8%Hannah Fry: 5.3%Daily Pilot: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion11.8%This article: 2.0%Hannah Fry: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Begging the Question2.0%This article: 11.1%Hannah Fry: 2.6%Daily Pilot: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.1%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 1.2%Hannah Fry: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Appeal to Nature1.2%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 22.3%Hannah Fry: 2.6%Daily Pilot: 2.8%Anecdotal22.3%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.3%Hannah Fry: 1.5%Daily Pilot: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.3%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 1.5%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 1.0%Hannah Fry: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection1.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 2.6%Daily Pilot: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 11.1%Hannah Fry: 0.6%Daily Pilot: 1.5%Indoctrination11.1%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 0.6%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Fry: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

601 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers65%attributed speech212writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageScott Wahl • 31 words • 0.0% coverageScott Wahl • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageIslamic Center of San Diego • 36 words • 0.0% coverageScott Wahl • 23 words • 0.0% coverageAmin Abdullah • 14 words • 0.0% coverageAmin Abdullah • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageShaykh Uthman Ibn Farooq • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageIslamic Center of San Diego • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageSuzan Hamideh • 48 words • 100.0% coverageSuzan Hamideh • 8 words • 0.0% coverageSuzan Hamideh • 8 words • 0.0% coverageSuzan Hamideh • 7 words • 0.0% coverageSuzan Hamideh • 12 words • 100.0% coverageSuzan Hamideh • 7 words • 100.0% coverageSuzan Hamideh • 34 words • 0.0% coverageSuzan Hamideh • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageOdai Shanah • 9 words • 0.0% coverageOdai Shanah • 15 words • 0.0% coverageOdai Shanah • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageOdai Shanah • 9 words • 0.0% coverageOdai Shanah • 3 words • 0.0% coverageOdai Shanah • 4 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Suzan Hamideh

100%flagged-word coverage
143 attributed words37% of attributed speech70% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Indoctrination+46.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Suzan Hamideh: 46.9%46.9%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.