Kotaku73%

Atari And Universal Sign Movie Deal For 10 Video Game Adaptations, Including Pong, Asteroids And Missile Command 45%

By Lewis Parker65%

7/24/2026, 5:17:55 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 770 faulty-reasoning hits from 360 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47.3% and a BS Rank of 45% (12,240 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 55.90% of the article peer group.

Atari, the once-massive video game console manufacturer and publisher founded in 1972, has signed over the movie adaptation rights to 10 of its properties to Universal Pictures, and a feature film based on one currently unconfirmed “Atari IP” is already in the works. 
As reported by <i>Deadline</i>, the deal between Atari and Universal Pictures was confirmed by Atari CEO Wade Rosen. <i>Deadline </i>also managed to procure an exact list of the ten properties featured in the deal: <em>Asteroids, </em><i>Adventure</i>, <i>Berzerk</i>, <i>Breakout</i>, <i>Centipede</i>, <i>Crystal Castles</i>, <i>Millipede</i>, <i>Missile Command</i>, <i>Yars’ Revenge</i>, and, yes, even <i>Pong</i>. 
Assumedly, the 50+ demographic is in high demand these days. 
The report states that Universal Pictures is already working on bringing one of these ten Atari properties to the big screen. 
However, exactly which property Universal plans to adapt first is currently a mystery. 
Whatever the Atari IP ends up being, it&#8217;ll be produced by Entertainment 360&#8217;s Guymon Casady, with a screenplay to be penned by Matt Reilly and Carl Hampe. 
While Universal Pictures didn’t confirm <em>Deadline’s</em> report, Atari’s chairman and CEO, Wade Rosen, was more than happy to spill the beans on their upcoming collaboration: “For more than five decades, Atari has created games and worlds that have remained part of popular culture long after their original release… We are excited to work with Universal and Entertainment 360 to bring the spirit of our iconic brand and games to a new medium.” 
The funny thing is, thanks to Atari’s long and highly complicated history of ownership, this opens the door to some far weirder collaborations in the future. 
As Atari is now owned by Atari SA, which was formerly Infogrames Games, there’s a chance we might see feature films based on properties such as <i>RollerCoaster Tycoon</i>, <i>System Shock</i>, and maybe even <i>Bubsy</i>. 
Sure, a <i>System Shock</i> movie would make way more sense and even has the potential to be good, but I personally think it would be way funnier if we collectively gaslight Universal Pictures into thinking that a <i>Bubsy </i>movie would make morbillion dollars at the box office. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 5.2%Kotaku: 4.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.7%Kotaku: 1.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 23.3%Lewis Parker: 5.6%Kotaku: 4.0%Availability Heuristic23.3%This article: 2.8%Lewis Parker: 1.1%Kotaku: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic2.8%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.6%Kotaku: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Lewis Parker: 1.5%Kotaku: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 5.0%Kotaku: 5.8%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 1.8%Kotaku: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.3%Kotaku: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.2%Kotaku: 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 20.0%Lewis Parker: 5.6%Kotaku: 2.9%Optimism Bias20.0%This article: 13.1%Lewis Parker: 2.6%Kotaku: 3.4%Pessimism Bias13.1%This article: 7.2%Lewis Parker: 18.4%Kotaku: 13.5%Negativity Bias7.2%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.4%Kotaku: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 1.0%Kotaku: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.9%Kotaku: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.1%Kotaku: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 20.0%Lewis Parker: 1.9%Kotaku: 3.6%Halo Effect20.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.4%Kotaku: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 3.7%Kotaku: 2.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.3%Kotaku: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.2%Kotaku: 1.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 20.0%Lewis Parker: 4.5%Kotaku: 2.6%Appeal to Authority20.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 1.5%Kotaku: 2.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 7.2%Lewis Parker: 1.8%Kotaku: 1.0%Slippery Slope7.2%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 12.2%Lewis Parker: 12.2%Kotaku: 9.4%Hasty Generalization12.2%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 13.1%Lewis Parker: 2.0%Kotaku: 1.1%Bandwagon13.1%This article: 13.1%Lewis Parker: 9.3%Kotaku: 5.8%Appeal to Emotion13.1%This article: 13.1%Lewis Parker: 1.7%Kotaku: 0.9%Begging the Question13.1%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 1.5%Kotaku: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 2.0%Kotaku: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.4%Kotaku: 0.5%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 9.8%Kotaku: 4.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 2.8%Kotaku: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 1.5%Kotaku: 0.5%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.4%Kotaku: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.3%Kotaku: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 20.0%Lewis Parker: 4.2%Kotaku: 2.8%Unattributed Quote20.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 3.2%Kotaku: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 13.1%Lewis Parker: 13.6%Kotaku: 15.3%Biased Writer Voice13.1%This article: 13.1%Lewis Parker: 1.5%Kotaku: 2.4%Indoctrination13.1%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 6.0%Kotaku: 3.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

360 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker20%attributed speech288writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 50 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWade Rosen • 72 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Wade Rosen

100%flagged-word coverage
72 attributed words100% of attributed speech58% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Wade Rosen: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-16.3 ptsWriter: 16.3%Wade Rosen: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-16.3 ptsWriter: 16.3%Wade Rosen: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.