Gothamist⁠76%

Spring is here again: You can now ride the Coney Island Cyclone ⁠58%

By Hannah Frishberg⁠0%

3/28/2026, 2:00:51 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 76.5% saturation with 189 hits. Analysis detected 1,099 faulty-reasoning hits from 247 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 54.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (9,053 of 21,172 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the article peer group.

Spring is here at last: Coney Island's Luna Park is officially open for the 2026 season. 
The annual egg cream christening of the Cyclone will take place Sunday, March 29 at 11 a.m. 
The rickety old rollercoaster turns 99 this year, and to celebrate the first 99 guests will ride the landmarked icon for free. 
While supplies last, they’ll also receive a free, classic egg cream. 
Mere feet away, the fiscally separate but spiritually conjoined Deno’s Wonder Wheel Park will also be opening this weekend. 
Its 41st Annual Blessing of the Rides will take place at 10 a.m. on Sunday, with Pastor Mary Smith of Coney Island’s Salt & Sea Mission leading the ceremony and the FDNY Ceremonial Unit leading a singing of the National Anthem. 
In celebration of the slightly older Wonder Wheel’s 106th birthday, the first 106 guests will ride for free. 
(While it costs to ride, admission to both parks is free.) 
This season’s reopening comes on the heels of two significant developments for the People’s Playground: the end of a bid to build a controversial casino in the neighborhood and the launch of a fundraising campaign for the Mermaid Parade by its producer, nonprofit Coney Island USA. 
The event is facing “an urgent financial crisis,” the group wrote in its GoFundMe, and “Without immediate support, one of New York’s most iconic and beloved summer traditions for over 40 years could disappear.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 13.8%Hannah Frishberg: 2.6%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias13.8%This article: 4.5%Hannah Frishberg: 3.1%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias4.5%This article: 8.9%Hannah Frishberg: 5.2%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic8.9%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 1.7%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 2.0%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 42.1%Hannah Frishberg: 14.4%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect42.1%This article: 34.4%Hannah Frishberg: 2.0%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion34.4%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 2.4%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 23.1%Hannah Frishberg: 5.9%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias23.1%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 1.8%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 38.9%Hannah Frishberg: 5.5%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias38.9%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 2.4%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 18.6%Hannah Frishberg: 4.3%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias18.6%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.9%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 16.6%Hannah Frishberg: 6.6%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect16.6%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 2.8%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Hannah Frishberg: 0.7%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect4.9%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 5.2%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 7.0%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 18.6%Hannah Frishberg: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring18.6%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 2.9%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 13.8%Hannah Frishberg: 6.8%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion13.8%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 2.3%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 13.8%Hannah Frishberg: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof13.8%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 6.5%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 16.6%Hannah Frishberg: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)16.6%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 18.6%Hannah Frishberg: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote18.6%This article: 13.8%Hannah Frishberg: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection13.8%This article: 32.4%Hannah Frishberg: 9.6%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice32.4%This article: 16.6%Hannah Frishberg: 2.2%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination16.6%This article: 18.6%Hannah Frishberg: 0.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias18.6%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 76.5%Hannah Frishberg: 6.3%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…76.5%

247 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.