Truthout74%

Attempts to Charge People With Assaulting Immigration Agents are Falling Apart 56%

By Chris Walker52%

7/21/2026, 1:52:13 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 534 faulty-reasoning hits from 451 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 53.6% and a BS Rank of 56% (9,644 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the article peer group.

An examination of cases in which people were arrested for supposedly assaulting an immigration agent finds that nearly half of those charges were either dropped or resulted in no conviction  suggesting that federal law enforcement has engaged in widespread misconduct in carrying out President Donald Trump’s mass deportation campaign. 
The New York Times report, published on July 18, examined the close to 550 cases in which individuals  generally protesters and/or immigrants  were arrested for assault due to their alleged conduct during interactions with immigration agents since President Donald Trump returned to office. 
Of those arrests, 459 cases have been resolved so far. 
Of those, 246 cases ended in a guilty plea from those who were charged. 
Only four cases that went to trial resulted in a conviction. 
Conversely, 213 of the total assault cases observed resulted in jury acquittals, judges tossing out the charges, or prosecutors withdrawing the case. 
The DOJ is accustomed to a higher success rate, with around 90 percent of people who face charges from the department typically either being found guilty or making a guilty plea arrangement. 
“There seems to be a pattern of charges being filed without any merit,” former Chicago-based federal prosecutor Jimmy Arce told the Times. 
The report comes as federal immigration agencies, such as Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), are facing renewed scrutiny for their violent tactics in cities across the U.S. 
Last week, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) temporarily suspended ICE agents from engaging in traffic stops after agents shot and killed two men, one from Maine and the other from Texas. 
Neither individual was engaged in illegal actions at the time of their stop. 
After that enforcement action was halted, President Donald Trump intervened, demanding on Truth Social that the pause be lifted. 
“We CANNOT give up one of ICE’s most important and effective Crime Fighting tools, THE TRAFFIC STOP! 
Once we do, we are playing right into the criminal’s hands,” Trump wrote. 
In the wake of these killings, new polling reveals that most Americans are deeply distrustful of ICE. 
According to an Economist/YouGov poll published on Tuesday, only 38 percent of voters say they have “a great deal” of or “some” confidence in the agency. 
Meanwhile, 53 percent said they have “only a little” or no confidence “at all” in ICE. 
A plurality of respondents, 48 percent, said they’d like to see the agency abolished, with 40 percent disagreeing. 
Trump himself has seen his polling numbers on immigration slip dramatically. 
Once a strong issue for the president, only 39 percent now approve of how he’s handling immigration, according to the poll, while 54 percent disapprove. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.9%Chris Walker: 5.9%Truthout: 5.8%Confirmation Bias4.9%This article: 7.1%Chris Walker: 0.9%Truthout: 0.8%Anchoring Bias7.1%This article: 4.0%Chris Walker: 3.1%Truthout: 3.4%Availability Heuristic4.0%This article: 7.1%Chris Walker: 1.3%Truthout: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic7.1%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.7%Truthout: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 1.9%Truthout: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%Chris Walker: 5.7%Truthout: 10.0%Framing Effect7.3%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.8%Truthout: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.4%Truthout: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.4%Truthout: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.7%Truthout: 1.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Chris Walker: 1.9%Truthout: 2.3%Pessimism Bias2.9%This article: 21.3%Chris Walker: 9.7%Truthout: 12.2%Negativity Bias21.3%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 1.3%Truthout: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 1.1%Truthout: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.1%Truthout: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 2.3%Truthout: 1.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.6%Truthout: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.5%Truthout: 1.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.2%Truthout: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.1%Truthout: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.8%Chris Walker: 1.5%Truthout: 1.2%Recency Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.2%Truthout: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.1%Truthout: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 1.6%Truthout: 1.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.7%Truthout: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 3.1%Truthout: 3.7%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 1.6%Truthout: 1.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 2.9%Chris Walker: 1.2%Truthout: 1.5%Slippery Slope2.9%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.4%Truthout: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 16.0%Chris Walker: 5.8%Truthout: 7.7%Hasty Generalization16.0%This article: 6.0%Chris Walker: 0.2%Truthout: 0.3%Red Herring6.0%This article: 4.0%Chris Walker: 0.7%Truthout: 0.6%Bandwagon4.0%This article: 3.8%Chris Walker: 7.6%Truthout: 8.8%Appeal to Emotion3.8%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 1.5%Truthout: 1.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.8%Chris Walker: 2.6%Truthout: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.8%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.0%Truthout: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.8%Truthout: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.1%Truthout: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.1%Truthout: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.9%Chris Walker: 1.6%Truthout: 2.7%Anecdotal4.9%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.0%Truthout: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.9%Chris Walker: 1.9%Truthout: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.9%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.0%Truthout: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.0%Truthout: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.1%Truthout: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.2%Truthout: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.1%Truthout: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 1.9%Truthout: 1.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 4.9%Chris Walker: 1.8%Truthout: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection4.9%This article: 11.1%Chris Walker: 6.5%Truthout: 9.5%Biased Writer Voice11.1%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 3.3%Truthout: 2.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 6.1%Truthout: 7.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.4%Truthout: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 3.4%Truthout: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

451 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers19%attributed speech367writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 50 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageJimmy Arce • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Homeland Security (DHS) • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 17 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jimmy Arce

100%flagged-word coverage
22 attributed words26% of attributed speech55% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jimmy Arce: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-13.6 ptsWriter: 13.6%Jimmy Arce: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.