AP News53%

Back-to-back powerful earthquakes slam Venezuela, collapsing buildings in the capital of Caracas 10%

By REGINA GARCIA CANO0% JUAN PABLO ARRAEZ0%

6/24/2026, 10:38:18 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 28.1% saturation with 99 hits. Analysis detected 371 faulty-reasoning hits from 352 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 27.1% and a BS Rank of 10% (19,705 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 90.00% of the article peer group.

CARACAS, Venezuela (AP)  Back-to-back powerful earthquakes slammed Venezuela on Wednesday evening, collapsing buildings in the capital of Caracas and leaving residents shaken. 
The U.S. 
Geological Survey said the first earthquake had a magnitude of 7.1 and its epicenter was west of the community of Morón, located along the country’s Caribbean coast, about 168 kilometers (104 miles) west of Caracas. 
The quake had a depth of 22 kilometers. 
The USGS reported an even larger 7.5-magnitude earthquake just a minute later. 
The second quake had a depth of 10 kilometers and its epicenter was 16 kilometers (10 miles) southwest of Morón. 
The quakes are among the strongest to strike Venezuela in more than a century. 
The earthquakes struck shortly after 6 p.m. local time. 
People evacuated swaying buildings in Caracas and remained outside, many visibly shocked as they saw entire walls that had collapsed, making furniture visible from the street. 
Dust columns could also be seen in two neighborhoods of the capital, where restaurants and other businesses are typically busy. 
People remained on the streets after sunset. 
Some sat on the ground hugging their pets as dust gathered around them. 
“The building really shook from side to side. 
Unreal. 
The force was incredibly strong,” Caracas resident Roberto Gamas said. 
“We were walking and it was tossing us around. 
Everything in the apartment fell. 
Well, thank God we were able to get out.” 
The U.S. 
Pacific Tsunami Warning Center issued a tsunami alert for Virgin Islands. 
Authorities in the Dominican Republic also issued one for the island. 
Another alert for Puerto Rico was quickly lifted. 
Strong earthquakes are unusual in Venezuela. 
While the country sits near multiple fault lines, its position straddling the South American and Caribbean plates makes earthquakes much less common than in other parts of Latin America. 
Along the Pacific coast  in Mexico and Chile, for example  earthquakes are frequent; the two countries sit along the seismically active tectonic belt known as the “Pacific Ring of Fire,” responsible for 90% of earthquakes, according to the USGS. 
___ 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 2.5%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.5%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 3.5%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic4.0%This article: 1.7%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.6%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic1.7%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.5%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 19.9%Regina Garcia Cano: 1.1%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias19.9%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 6.3%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.5%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.9%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.6%Regina Garcia Cano: 2.1%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 1.7%AP News: 2.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 18.8%Regina Garcia Cano: 10.6%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias18.8%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.8%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 1.8%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 1.0%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.7%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.9%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 1.0%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.3%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.9%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 28.1%Regina Garcia Cano: 2.9%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority28.1%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.8%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.8%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 4.1%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.3%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 11.9%Regina Garcia Cano: 6.7%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion11.9%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.6%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 8.2%Regina Garcia Cano: 2.8%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.2%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.5%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.4%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.1%Regina Garcia Cano: 3.1%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal5.1%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.5%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.3%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.6%Regina Garcia Cano: 2.1%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote2.6%This article: 2.6%Regina Garcia Cano: 1.1%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection2.6%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 5.6%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.4%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.6%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.2%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Regina Garcia Cano: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

352 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers38%attributed speech220writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageGeological Survey • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageUSGS • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageRoberto Gamas • 10 words • 0.0% coverageRoberto Gamas • 9 words • 0.0% coverageRoberto Gamas • 5 words • 0.0% coverageRoberto Gamas • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coveragePacific Tsunami Warning Center • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageUSGS • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

USGS

100%flagged-word coverage
53 attributed words40% of attributed speech60% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Unattributed Quote-4.1 ptsWriter: 4.1%USGS: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-4.1 ptsWriter: 4.1%USGS: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.