Sea cucumbers harbor ‘zombie’ tissues that won’t die 1%

By Saugat Bolakhe0%

6/22/2026, 3:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Unattributed Quote, and Confirmation Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 750 faulty-reasoning hits from 474 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 1% (21,652 of 21,792 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the article peer group.

“It’s an amazing finding,” but not entirely surprising given the sea cucumber's remarkable capabilities, says José García Arrarás, a regenerative biologist at the University of Puerto Rico in San Juan. 
Some species can be cut in half, with each half regenerating completely. 
“But [the work] raises fascinating questions,” says García Arrarás, who was not involved with the research. 
“What kind of cells are they? 
How do they feed? 
Can these tissues outlive the animal itself?” 
Sausage-shaped sea cucumbers are marine invertebrates that typically range in length from a few centimeters to over 30 centimeters, depending on the species. 
They live on seafloors from shallow coastal waters to the deep ocean and are close relatives of sea stars. 
Scientists who study sea cucumbers in the lab typically keep them in tanks filled with fresh seawater, says marine ecologist Annie Mercier. 
During one routine transfer of a scarlet sea cucumber between tanks, one of Mercier’s colleagues noticed that the animal had left behind a few podia, small tubelike appendages it uses for movement, on the bottom of the tank. 
That’s something that often happens in nature, too. 
“We would have expected those to decay and waste away quite rapidly, but several days later they were still there,” says Mercier, of Memorial University of Newfoundland in St. 
John’s, Canada. 
Surprised, Mercier and colleagues investigated what would happen to other tissues they cut off using a scalpel, including tentacles and body wall. 
While the body wall tissues died within weeks, the tube feet and tentacles survived for more than three years. 
This microscopic image depicts detached tube feet tissue from a scarlet sea cucumber, about 2 millimeters in diameter. 
It has survived under natural conditions for several years. 
Sara Jobson/Mercier Lab/MUN 
Using a typical compound microscope, the researchers observed that the tissue went through cleaning of the wound where it was cut, clearing out old dead cells and division of living cells. 
When researchers added amino acids labeled with a trackable atomic tag to seawater, they could see that the tissue absorbed the nutrients. 
The tissue didn’t decay even after getting buried in a couple of centimeters of mud. 
“We started calling it our ‘zombie project,’” Mercier says. 
“It’s a piece of tissue that isn’t decaying. 
It’s still acquiring nutrients, reshaping itself, evolving and doing all sorts of living things, yet it’s not necessarily a living organism in the traditional sense.” 
The work can offer new ways to study changes that occur during aging, García Arrarás says. 
“They have tissues that are a week old and others three years old, coming from the same original tissue,” he says. 
However, a key next step should be detailing characteristics of the cells within the tissues. 
“You need to know exactly what you have before you can understand what’s going on,” he says. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.9%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 2.6%Confirmation Bias12.9%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 1.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 2.5%Availability Heuristic3.2%This article: 7.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic7.0%This article: 6.1%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias6.1%This article: 4.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias4.0%This article: 3.6%Saugat Bolakhe: 1.8%Science News: 4.1%Framing Effect3.6%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.6%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.3%Status Quo Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.5%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 4.0%Optimism Bias6.5%This article: 3.6%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 1.5%Pessimism Bias3.6%This article: 6.3%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 4.0%Negativity Bias6.3%This article: 3.4%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.4%Self-Serving Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 1.3%Halo Effect5.3%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.9%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 1.0%Recency Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 17.7%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 4.4%Appeal to Authority17.7%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.5%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 3.9%Hasty Generalization2.5%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 2.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 3.6%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.5%Begging the Question3.6%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 6.5%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.4%Burden of Proof6.5%This article: 4.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.3%Appeal to Nature4.0%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 9.7%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 1.1%Anecdotal9.7%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 18.6%Saugat Bolakhe: 2.6%Science News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)18.6%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 17.7%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.7%Unattributed Quote17.7%This article: 1.7%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection1.7%This article: 7.8%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 2.5%Biased Writer Voice7.8%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Saugat Bolakhe: 0.0%Science News: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

474 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers47%attributed speech249writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageJosé García Arrarás • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJosé García Arrarás • 16 words • 100.0% coverageJosé García Arrarás • 6 words • 100.0% coverageJosé García Arrarás • 4 words • 100.0% coverageJosé García Arrarás • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageAnnie Mercier • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageAnnie Mercier • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageAnnie Mercier • 9 words • 0.0% coverageAnnie Mercier • 8 words • 0.0% coverageAnnie Mercier • 25 words • 0.0% coverageJosé García Arrarás • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJosé García Arrarás • 21 words • 100.0% coverageJosé García Arrarás • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJosé García Arrarás • 17 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
132 attributed words59% of attributed speech73% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Unattributed Quote+63.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%José García Arrarás: 63.6%63.6%Quote-first Misdirection-3.2 ptsWriter: 3.2%José García Arrarás: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-3.2 ptsWriter: 3.2%José García Arrarás: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.