Seven Smithsonians Are Closed Today 2%

By Sarah Marloff

8/6/2026, 8:09:39 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 3 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 32 faulty-reasoning hits from 438 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 2% (29,852 of 30,190 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 98.90% of the article peer group.

The interior courtyard of the Hirshhorn Museum 
Update, Friday, Aug. 
7 : All of the Smithsonian buildings have reopened today, according to the institution’s website. 
If you had plans to spend the day wandering between museums on the Mall, you might want to rethink them. 
Seven Smithsonians, including the National Museum of the American Indian and the Hirshhorn, have been closed for the day due to a “mechanical issue affecting building operations,” according to a media advisory sent out this morning. 
The Smithsonian responded to City Paper ’s questions later Thursday afternoon, writing via email, “The buildings were closed after an outage at [General Services Administration]’s Heating Operations and Transmission Division plant disrupted the chilled water supply needed to support the Smithsonian’s cooling systems and humidity controls in South Mall museums. 
Once GSA resolves this issue, the Smithsonian will return to normal operations.” 
Such unexpected summer closures aren’t abnormal. 
In September 2024 , the National Museum of African American History and Culture closed for a day, due to “mechanical issues.” 
And last summer, four Smithsonians closed for several days because of a HVAC problem. 
All four museums—NMAI and the Hirshhorn as well as the National Museum of Asian Art and the National Museum of African Art—are among the seven buildings that are closed today. 
The others are the S. 
Dillon Ripley Center, the Arts and Industries Building, the Smithsonian Castle—the last two of which are only open to the public through Sept. 
7. 
The castle, which has been closed since 2003 for major renovations, reopened this summer for the country’s Semiquincentennial . 
It’s currently housing American Aspirations , a special exhibit reflecting on America’s 250 years, which was co-curated by Secretary of the Smithsonian Lonnie G . 
Bunch . 
The exhibit, featuring “more than 30 of Smithsonian’s most treasured objects,” according to the museum, is only open for several more days, with an expected end date of Aug. 
10. 
This summer has also marked the return of the Arts and Industries Building, which has been open to the public daily during regular visiting hours for the first time since 2004. 
Voices and Votes: Exploring Democracy Across America , which examines civic participation and representation, is on view there through Sept. 
7. 
Both openings are part of Our Shared Future: 250, the Smithsonian’s multiyear initiative to commemorate the country’s 250th anniversary. 
The remaining Smithsonians are open to the public today and those interested in visiting the closed spaces should visit si.edu/visit for the latest information. 
Update: This story was updated at 4:30 p.m., Aug. 6, with the Smithsonian’s statement on what caused the closure. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 1.8%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 1.0%Availability Heuristic1.4%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 5.4%Framing Effect4.6%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 1.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 6.5%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 1.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 1.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 1.5%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.4%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 3.1%Hasty Generalization1.4%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 3.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.4%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 7.6%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 3.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 4.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Marloff: 0.0%Washington City Paper: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

438 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker14%attributed speech376writer words
Selected voice

Smithsonian

0%flagged-word coverage
62 attributed words100% of attributed speech6.9% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.