How Does It Feel When Your Government Wants to Eradicate You? Read On. 35%

By Brynn Tannehill38%

6/28/2026, 4:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, False Dilemma, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 351 hits. Analysis detected 2,982 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,469 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42.7% and a BS Rank of 35% (13,801 of 21,203 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 65.10% of the article peer group.

Every once a while I encounter a 
quote that brings me up short and helps reframe how I see the world. 
Such was 
the case when I came across this quote by Theodor Adorno as I researched the 
rise of Nazi Germany and the origins of the Holocaust: “A wrong life cannot be 
lived rightly.” 
Adorno meant it as a critique of life under capitalism, but out of context, I interpreted it</span>&nbsp;to 
mean that if a person is the wrong sort of life (Jewish, Sinti, disabled), 
nothing that person can do can grant them the grace of being “one of the good 
ones,” or being life worthy of life. 
No matter their character, achievements, or 
capability, a “wrong life” can have only a negative value to society. 
The only 
way to balance the equation is to eliminate that wrong life and bring the sum 
to zero on both sides. 
This thought stopped me in my 
tracks, and I could hear the paradigm shift without a clutch, because it 
explained everything I was both feeling and seeing over the past year. 
It was 
the grand unification theorem of my inner world and explained what I was seeing 
that was external to me. 
I am wrong life in the United 
States. 
And despite my efforts to live rightly, it simply does not matter. 
Nothing I can do will change the equation, other than my eradication. 
Internally, this realization is what fuels my anger. 
I genuinely tried to be a 
good person and contribute in ways that are lauded in others. 
I’m angry at the 
breaking of the American compact that supposedly we should be judged by the 
content of our character and not by government fiat that people like me are 
incapable of leading “honorable” or “disciplined” lives. 
I’m furious at the 
hypocrisy and having wasted my life trying to earn a place in a country that 
ultimately decided I must be destroyed. 
I’m being kicked out of the National 
Guard. 
I can’t legally use a public bathroom on federal property or at most 
airports. 
As a veteran, I have a free pass onto national parks that I effectively 
can never use because I’m wrong life. 
I will never be able to work in my field 
again because I am wrong life. 
At the VA, the only treatments I can receive are 
essentially reeducation—namely, unwanted therapy and medical treatment aimed at 
detransition. 
I spent decades of my life as a 
service member, and in my final years I chose to be a MEDEVAC pilot to save 
people rather than kill them. 
I volunteered as a superhero cosplayer to raise 
money for desperately ill children and their families. 
I spent my summer flying 
as a firefighter, saving ranches owned by Trump donors, properties owned by the 
Mormon Church, and Bible camps run by people who would never let people like me 
attend. 
I went on to fly air ambulance 
helicopters in one of the reddest parts of the country while awaiting my 
Canadian permanent residency paperwork. 
When I was flying people around who 
needed urgent medical care quickly, I could take a pretty good guess that they were 
likely the sort of people who voted for Trump and would happily support 
“putting all those transgenders in mental institutions where they belong.” 
But 
they couldn’t because they were intubated, and I was busy flying them to a better 
hospital, regardless of what they might think of me. 
But none of it matters. 
My 
government, and the people who voted it into office, have declared me wrong 
life, and there’s nothing I can do to change it. 
Indeed, the president 
explicitly ran on the idea that I am wrong life; it was a feature and not a 
bug. 
His campaign spent hundreds 
of millions of dollars 
promoting the idea that anyone who doesn’t want 
wrong life eliminated is against the <i>Herrenvolk</i>. 
It was messaging 
straight out of the 
Nazi 
playbook, just targeting a different group. 
At the same time, this sentence 
helps me understand why this level of bigotry reminds me more of the Holocaust 
than other civil rights atrocities in American history. 
At the end of the day 
in that history, for most other marginalized groups, it was still possible to 
be one of “the good ones.” 
For Black people, there was room for acceptance of 
those who “knew their place.” 
Whites needed them for their labor. 
Indeed, the 
South fought the Civil War because they needed slavery for their economy. 
Japanese Americans were interned but allowed to fight in the European Theater 
of Operations. 
Hispanics and Latinos were long used for their labor or valued 
as reliable Republican voters in Florida. 
Their lives had less value than other 
Americans’, but it wasn’t a negative number. 
Mine is. 
And that’s the fundamental 
difference between the oppression and demonization of transgender people today 
and the civil rights issues of the past. 
It’s also why the policies being 
enacted look far more like Nazi efforts to 
push 
Jews and LGBT people 
out of Germany as noncitizens of the Reich than 
previous government efforts to keep certain classes of people “in their place” 
as second-class citizens. 
The Adorno quote snapped into place 
why I have felt far more comfortable framing current events within the scope of 
German history than within that of the United States. 
It’s also the most useful 
framework for understanding why Republicans around the country are targeting 
transgender people with literally over 1,000 bills per year designed to make 
life impossible enough that they either emigrate, detransition, or 
live in a country (this one) where they aren’t allowed to leave their houses 
for fear of arrest because a minor might see them in public. 
They see us as wrong life. 
And even 
those who do not see us as such are willing to go along with it because it is 
the dark side of politics: It looks like the quick and easy path to power to 
take this position in public. 
Any Republican who does not behave as if 
transgender people are all wrong life is likely to be forced out of the party, 
and away from the levers of power. 
Democrats and hospital administrators in 
blue states aren’t generally willing to enforce their own civil rights laws for 
fear of the federal government and the belief that transgender people aren’t 
worth the effort of protecting. 
I have expressed some of these 
frustrations before, and people have expressed sentiments along the lines of, “Well, 
I don’t think of you that way.” 
While I am appreciative of such support, people 
saying this simply doesn’t matter since they have no institutional power. 
My 
own sense of self-worth is completely irrelevant to this equation, and changes 
nothing in practice. 
Neither do the sentiments of people with no authority. 
Not to put too fine a point on it, my sense of self-esteem, and what some powerless people think about me, is 
meaningless if I’m spending my last moments holding my breath and trying to 
claw my way through concrete with my fingernails while taking a “shower” with 
100 strangers.&nbsp; All it provides is a 
further sense that the situation is unjust. 
It does nothing to keep me alive in 
the face of a movement that controls the government and has officially declared 
us to be “wrong life.” 
If this seems like exaggeration: It’s 
not. 
One of the cruelest ironies is that my friends and I constantly receive 
messages that are some variation of “Kill yourself, tranny faggot,” sent by the 
same sorts of people who five years ago smugly informed us that “all lives 
matter.” 
The world’s first trillionaire routinely brags about “killing the woke 
mind virus” on his own social media platform. 
Only the government’s opinion 
matters. 
And no matter what I do, I cannot be anything other than wrong life in 
their eyes. 
That incumbent party has made it clear it intends to remain in 
power in perpetuity at any cost, no matter how people vote. 
I would always be 
wrong life if I remained in the United States. 
The only way to change the 
equation to zero without expiring is to remove myself from the equation the 
same way Jews did from Germany: by emigrating to a place where their lives can 
have some value greater than zero. 
I want my life to have a positive 
value again as seen by the people who matter. 
I cannot express how much of a 
relief it was when I did not have to spend every waking moment aware of being 
wrong life. 
If you wondered what being trans in America is like today, it’s being 
in a constant state of sadness, betrayal, and futility at the possibility of 
leading a life that matters.&nbsp; 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.0%Brynn Tannehill: 3.6%newrepublic.com: 6.1%Confirmation Bias11.0%This article: 1.9%Brynn Tannehill: 1.1%newrepublic.com: 0.5%Anchoring Bias1.9%This article: 4.9%Brynn Tannehill: 4.0%newrepublic.com: 3.3%Availability Heuristic4.9%This article: 6.9%Brynn Tannehill: 1.7%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic6.9%This article: 0.0%Brynn Tannehill: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Brynn Tannehill: 1.8%newrepublic.com: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias4.6%This article: 5.8%Brynn Tannehill: 1.3%newrepublic.com: 8.0%Framing Effect5.8%This article: 1.0%Brynn Tannehill: 0.9%newrepublic.com: 0.4%Loss Aversion1.0%This article: 0.0%Brynn Tannehill: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Brynn Tannehill: 0.8%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect1.4%This article: 1.5%Brynn Tannehill: 0.7%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Optimism Bias1.5%This article: 15.6%Brynn Tannehill: 8.8%newrepublic.com: 2.5%Pessimism Bias15.6%This article: 23.9%Brynn Tannehill: 7.1%newrepublic.com: 13.0%Negativity Bias23.9%This article: 4.3%Brynn Tannehill: 0.7%newrepublic.com: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias4.3%This article: 1.4%Brynn Tannehill: 1.4%newrepublic.com: 1.8%Fundamental Attribution Error1.4%This article: 0.0%Brynn Tannehill: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Brynn Tannehill: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 1.7%In-Group Bias2.9%This article: 3.5%Brynn Tannehill: 1.6%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.5%This article: 2.0%Brynn Tannehill: 1.1%newrepublic.com: 1.3%Halo Effect2.0%This article: 0.0%Brynn Tannehill: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brynn Tannehill: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brynn Tannehill: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brynn Tannehill: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brynn Tannehill: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.6%Brynn Tannehill: 0.3%newrepublic.com: 3.7%Ad Hominem0.6%This article: 0.0%Brynn Tannehill: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 1.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.2%Brynn Tannehill: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 3.4%Appeal to Authority2.2%This article: 16.5%Brynn Tannehill: 5.5%newrepublic.com: 1.9%False Dilemma16.5%This article: 5.8%Brynn Tannehill: 1.1%newrepublic.com: 1.9%Slippery Slope5.8%This article: 0.5%Brynn Tannehill: 0.8%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.5%This article: 21.3%Brynn Tannehill: 6.3%newrepublic.com: 7.9%Hasty Generalization21.3%This article: 0.3%Brynn Tannehill: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Red Herring0.3%This article: 1.9%Brynn Tannehill: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 0.7%Bandwagon1.9%This article: 12.6%Brynn Tannehill: 4.0%newrepublic.com: 6.3%Appeal to Emotion12.6%This article: 3.9%Brynn Tannehill: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 1.8%Begging the Question3.9%This article: 4.4%Brynn Tannehill: 2.0%newrepublic.com: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.4%This article: 0.0%Brynn Tannehill: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.4%Brynn Tannehill: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.9%Burden of Proof1.4%This article: 0.0%Brynn Tannehill: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 1.5%Brynn Tannehill: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Composition/Division1.5%This article: 13.3%Brynn Tannehill: 3.0%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Anecdotal13.3%This article: 0.4%Brynn Tannehill: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.4%This article: 5.4%Brynn Tannehill: 2.0%newrepublic.com: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.4%This article: 0.0%Brynn Tannehill: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Brynn Tannehill: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Brynn Tannehill: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Brynn Tannehill: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Brynn Tannehill: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.1%Brynn Tannehill: 2.0%newrepublic.com: 2.3%Unattributed Quote4.1%This article: 2.7%Brynn Tannehill: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection2.7%This article: 7.1%Brynn Tannehill: 4.3%newrepublic.com: 15.2%Biased Writer Voice7.1%This article: 2.5%Brynn Tannehill: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 2.4%Indoctrination2.5%This article: 0.8%Brynn Tannehill: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 7.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.8%This article: 0.8%Brynn Tannehill: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.8%This article: 0.0%Brynn Tannehill: 0.3%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1469 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker1.2%attributed speech1,452writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageTheodor Adorno • 15 words • 100.0% coverageTheodor Adorno • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Theodor Adorno

88%flagged-word coverage
17 attributed words100% of attributed speech82% writer coverage
0%45.0%90.0%Quote-first Misdirection+86.6 ptsWriter: 1.7%Theodor Adorno: 88.2%88.2%Unattributed Quote+85.1 ptsWriter: 3.1%Theodor Adorno: 88.2%88.2%Biased Writer Voice-7.2 ptsWriter: 7.2%Theodor Adorno: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-2.5 ptsWriter: 2.5%Theodor Adorno: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-0.8 ptsWriter: 0.8%Theodor Adorno: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -0.8 ptsWriter: 0.8%Theodor Adorno: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.