Gizmodo57%

A Dozen States Sue to Stop Paramount’s Takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery 33%

By Bruce Gil31%

7/13/2026, 8:45:03 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Begging the Question, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 162 hits. Analysis detected 975 faulty-reasoning hits from 598 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41.3% and a BS Rank of 33% (14,800 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 67.60% of the article peer group.

Paramount Skydance’s takeover of Warner Bros. 
Discovery is facing a new legal hurdle from a dozen states. 
A coalition of 12 states filed a lawsuit in federal court in California on Monday seeking to block the merger, which they argue would harm movie theaters, cable providers and consumers. 
“The unlawful merger of these two entertainment behemoths would lead to higher prices, lower quality, and less content for film and television, harming movie theaters, basic cable distributors, and ultimately, audiences on every sofa and movie theater seat in the U.S.,” California Attorney General Rob Bonta, who is leading the case, said in a press release. 
“With this lawsuit, California and our sister states are fighting for free and fair markets, not rigged markets. 
America has no kings in government or our economy.” 
The other 11 states that joined the lawsuit are Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon and Washington. 
## What’s in the suit? 
According to the lawsuit, the combined company would control a 27% share of the market for wide-release theatrical films in the United States. 
The deal would also reduce the country’s five major film distributors to only four, which would collectively control 86% of wide-release movies. 
On the television side, both Paramount and Warner Bros. 
Discovery own several major cable channels. 
In addition to the CBS broadcast network, Paramount owns channels including MTV, Nickelodeon, VH1 and Comedy Central. 
Warner Bros. 
Discovery owns CNN, TBS, TNT, Cartoon Network, HGTV and the Discovery Channel. 
The combined company would end up controling more than 50 basic cable channels, according to the lawsuit. 
Cord-cutters wouldn’t necessarily be immune to the effects of the deal, either. 
Paramount CEO David Ellison, the son of Oracle billionaire and Trump ally Larry Ellison, has said the company plans to combine Warner Bros. 
Discovery’s HBO Max with Paramount+ to better compete with Netflix. 
The lawsuit argues that the merged company would hold “enormous bargaining power” over movie theaters and cable companies while reducing competition. 
The states say that could result in higher price for movie tickets and cable packages, as well as, lower-quality services and fewer overall movies and television shows. 
Despite the Trump administration’s Justice Department clearing the merger last month, the states have asked both companies not to close the deal until this lawsuit plays out in court. 
If the companies move forward, the coalition says it will seek a temporary restraining order. 
Paramount and Warner Bros. 
Discovery did not immediately respond to requests for comment. 
Paramount and Warner Bros. 
Discovery agreed to the roughly $110 billion takeover earlier this year after Paramount fought off a competing bid from Netflix. 
The deal follows Skydance’s takeover of Paramount last year. 
## Mega-merger faces continued opposition 
This isn’t the first time this deal has faced scrutiny. 
Democratic Sens. 
Elizabeth Warren and Richard Blumenthal have previously called out the Trump adminstration for not adequately reviewing the deal for potential national-security risks. 
They pointed out that the $24 billion in financing for the deal is coming from the Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, the Qatar Investment Authority and the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority. 
Meanwhile, The Financial Times reported earlier this year that Gulf sovereign wealth funds have been reviewing their investments as the war with Iran continues to put economic pressure on the region. 
The cancellation of Stephen Colbert’s late-night show, along with changes at CBS News, has also raised eyes about the Ellisons’ ties to Trump and the potential for political influence on the companies’ news networks. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 13.5%Bruce Gil: 2.3%Gizmodo: 4.1%Confirmation Bias13.5%This article: 6.5%Bruce Gil: 1.8%Gizmodo: 1.4%Anchoring Bias6.5%This article: 5.5%Bruce Gil: 2.6%Gizmodo: 3.1%Availability Heuristic5.5%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 0.9%Gizmodo: 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 1.3%Gizmodo: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.2%Bruce Gil: 6.0%Gizmodo: 5.5%Framing Effect7.2%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 1.2%Gizmodo: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Bruce Gil: 0.2%Gizmodo: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect3.3%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 3.3%Gizmodo: 3.9%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Bruce Gil: 0.3%Gizmodo: 2.1%Pessimism Bias2.0%This article: 27.1%Bruce Gil: 5.6%Gizmodo: 7.5%Negativity Bias27.1%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 0.7%Gizmodo: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 0.1%Gizmodo: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 0.4%Gizmodo: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 2.0%Gizmodo: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.5%Bruce Gil: 0.9%Gizmodo: 1.6%Recency Bias1.5%This article: 4.8%Bruce Gil: 0.3%Gizmodo: 0.4%Primacy Effect4.8%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 0.1%Gizmodo: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 0.7%Gizmodo: 1.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.7%Bruce Gil: 4.4%Gizmodo: 4.3%Appeal to Authority3.7%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 0.5%Gizmodo: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 0.9%Gizmodo: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.5%Bruce Gil: 5.2%Gizmodo: 5.3%Hasty Generalization6.5%This article: 5.2%Bruce Gil: 0.5%Gizmodo: 0.3%Red Herring5.2%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 0.5%Gizmodo: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 16.6%Bruce Gil: 3.4%Gizmodo: 4.9%Appeal to Emotion16.6%This article: 9.4%Bruce Gil: 0.7%Gizmodo: 1.0%Begging the Question9.4%This article: 7.2%Bruce Gil: 1.2%Gizmodo: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.2%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 0.3%Gizmodo: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 0.2%Gizmodo: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.5%Bruce Gil: 0.8%Gizmodo: 2.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.5%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 3.8%Bruce Gil: 0.7%Gizmodo: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy3.8%This article: 9.4%Bruce Gil: 2.1%Gizmodo: 4.6%Unattributed Quote9.4%This article: 9.4%Bruce Gil: 1.9%Gizmodo: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection9.4%This article: 5.7%Bruce Gil: 2.1%Gizmodo: 13.5%Biased Writer Voice5.7%This article: 4.5%Bruce Gil: 0.5%Gizmodo: 1.6%Indoctrination4.5%This article: 3.7%Bruce Gil: 0.2%Gizmodo: 1.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 0.5%Gizmodo: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Gil: 5.0%Gizmodo: 3.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

598 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers19%attributed speech484writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageRob Bonta • 56 words • 100.0% coverageRob Bonta • 18 words • 100.0% coverageRob Bonta • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageFinancial Times • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Rob Bonta

100%flagged-word coverage
83 attributed words73% of attributed speech76% writer coverage
0%35.0%70.0%Unattributed Quote+67.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Rob Bonta: 67.5%67.5%Quote-first Misdirection+67.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Rob Bonta: 67.5%67.5%Indoctrination+32.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Rob Bonta: 32.5%32.5%Biased Writer Voice-7.0 ptsWriter: 7.0%Rob Bonta: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-4.5 ptsWriter: 4.5%Rob Bonta: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.