ABC News22%

Bellingham scores twice to lift England past Norway 2-1 4%

By ABC News15% ALANIS THAMES AP sports writer0%

7/11/2026, 2:57:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 204 faulty-reasoning hits from 589 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 17.7% and a BS Rank of 4% (21,091 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 96.40% of the article peer group.

Bellingham scores twice to lift England past Norway 2-1, into World Cup semifinals 
England reaches the World Cup semifinals for the first time since 2018. 
By ALANIS THAMES AP sports writer 
July 11, 2026, 5:57 PM 
MIAMI GARDENS, Fla. -- Jude Bellingham scored in the third minute of extra time to lift England past Norway 2-1 and into the World Cup semifinals for the first time since 2018. 
Bellingham's goal was his second of the game  he also had an equalizer late in the first half. 
The Real Madrid star is now tied with England teammate Harry Kane with six goals in this tournament, behind the eight of France’s Kylian Mbappé and Argentina’s Lionel Messi. 
He scored twice in the round of 16 as England beat co-host Mexico . 
England, winner of the 1966 World Cup and facing pressure to return to the title match, is now one win away from getting there. 
The Three Lions will face either Argentina or Switzerland, who were set to play Saturday night in Kansas City, Missouri. 
Andreas Schjelderup scored in the 36th minute for Norway, a squad that reached its first quarterfinals and took the internet by storm with its “Viking row” and the charisma of 6-foot-5 striker Erling Haaland . 
Haaland  the Manchester City star who had seven goals in this tournament  was held without a goal for the first time in the World Cup. 
He was subbed out on Saturday for Jorgen Strand Larsen in the second half of extra time. 
Norway nearly went ahead 2-1 in the 56th minute when Torbjørn Heggem put a rebound past goalkeeper Jordan Pickford after a corner kick. 
Following a video review, the goal was disallowed because of a foul by Haaland in the box. 
Haaland was also denied by Pickford on a point-blank header in the first half. 
Schjelderup, making just his second start of the tournament, fired a shot that caromed off the right post and into the net to stun an England team that had dominated possession to that point. 
Bellingham’s equalizer from close range elicited a roar from that crowd that included Mick Jagger and England great David Beckham. 
Schjelderup, who set up both of Haaland’s goals in Norway’s round of 16 win over Brazil, celebrated by stretching his arms wide and looking at the crowd as his teammates lifted him onto their shoulders. 
Meanwhile, Kane sat near midfield, grabbing his leg and looking toward the officials. 
No foul was called. 
Moments before Bellingham evened the score, a Norway goal kick resulted in the ball appearing to make contact with an aerial camera cable before landing at the feet of England’s Elliot Anderson. 
The ball was eventually played to Bellingham, who beat Ørjan Nyland with a low shot to the far post. 
By rule, if the ball had been noticed hitting the cable, play would have stopped and a drop ball would have been utilized to determine possession. 
There was a brief moment of silence before the match in honor of Jayden Adams , the 25-year-old midfielder for South Africa whose death was announced earlier Saturday. 
See more of AP’s World Cup coverage here 
Iran live updates: US strikes Iran after cargo ship attacked, CENTCOM says 
Toddler declared dead in drowning incident found alive in hospital morgue: Police 
Prince Archie, Princess Lilibet reunite with King Charles in UK 
Taylor Swift paid NYC more than $160k for wedding permit, mayor says 
24/7 coverage of breaking news and live events 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%ABC News: 1.5%ABC News: 2.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.7%ABC News: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%ABC News: 2.8%ABC News: 3.0%Availability Heuristic5.9%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.6%ABC News: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.4%ABC News: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.9%ABC News: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 4.7%ABC News: 6.8%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%ABC News: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.3%ABC News: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.1%ABC News: 1.3%ABC News: 2.4%Optimism Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 1.1%ABC News: 1.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.8%ABC News: 6.8%ABC News: 7.7%Negativity Bias7.8%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 1.1%ABC News: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.3%ABC News: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%ABC News: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.3%ABC News: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.3%ABC News: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%ABC News: 1.3%ABC News: 2.2%Halo Effect3.4%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 1.2%ABC News: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.3%ABC News: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.2%ABC News: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 2.8%ABC News: 3.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.2%ABC News: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 2.1%ABC News: 2.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.5%ABC News: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.5%ABC News: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 10.7%ABC News: 2.0%ABC News: 4.3%Appeal to Emotion10.7%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.3%ABC News: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 1.9%ABC News: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.3%ABC News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%ABC News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.7%ABC News: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 2.1%ABC News: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%ABC News: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 2.7%ABC News: 1.9%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.9%ABC News: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 2.2%ABC News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.7%ABC News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.4%ABC News: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.2%ABC News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%ABC News: 1.5%ABC News: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.7%

589 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers2.4%attributed speech575writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageALANIS THAMES • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageAP • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

AP

100%flagged-word coverage
8 attributed words57% of attributed speech28% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +98.6 ptsWriter: 1.4%AP: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.