Dear Abby: By the end of the cruise, the group was shunning me. I don’t know what I did. 26%

By Jeanne Phillips42%

8/6/2026, 12:51:04 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 180 hits. Analysis detected 974 faulty-reasoning hits from 637 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 30.9% and a BS Rank of 26% (21,790 of 29,134 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 74.80% of the article peer group.

DEAR ABBY 
Four years ago, my cousin “Roy” introduced me to his friends, who, once a month, have a party at the home of one of the couples. 
We would eat and then play a form of dominoes. 
It was raucous and fun. 
The second time I went, a couple in the group told me that now I was “part of the family.” 
I always had fun and laughed a lot, which I hadn’t experienced much after my husband died years ago. 
Roy even invited me to go on a couple of cruises with six people from the group. 
At the end of the last cruise, everyone shunned me, except for Roy, who instead was cruel and insulting to me. 
Abby, no one will tell me what horrible thing I could’ve said or done to make everyone so furious. 
I told Roy that he knew I’d never do anything to deliberately hurt or offend someone I loved. 
He never explained anything to me, and although I reached out to five members of the group, they won’t answer me either. 
How can I apologize if I don’t know what I said or did wrong? 
Roy has since died, so I can’t pursue the matter with him, and I’m wondering if I should try again with any of them to find out why they ghosted me? 
 LONELY WITHOUT THEM IN MISSOURI 
DEAR LONELY: If the reason you want to keep pursuing this after four years is to reestablish social relationships with these people, I think the ship has sailed on that score. 
If, for your own peace of mind, you would like an answer, consider approaching your cousin Roy’s friends one last time and asking about it. 
Whatever the answer may be, however, it is important that you enlarge your social circle and move forward. 
Continuing to dwell on this hurt will not be helpful at this point. 
DEAR ABBY: Six months ago, my wife and I hired a cleaning company to help around the house once a month. 
It has been a big help because my wife has arthritis. 
Even though her arthritis is debilitating at times, she insists on still working at least part time. 
When “Helen,” the woman who cleans our home, arrives, we offer her tea or something before she starts to clean. 
Recently, she asked my wife if she worked, and my wife responded that she works part time as a librarian. 
Helen’s response was, “Oh, I wish I could work part time.” 
My wife is 64 and worked full time until two years ago. 
Helen is probably in her 30s. 
I didn’t appreciate Helen’s demeanor. 
Her response had a hint of jealousy. 
My wife and I are quiet people. 
We dislike strife. 
How can we politely tell Helen she talks too much? 
We don’t mind for a little while, but she talks almost the entire time she’s at our home. 
 UNRECEPTIVE AUDIENCE IN NEW YORK 
DEAR U.A.: A way to accomplish that would be to stop offering Helen “tea or something” when she arrives, which should give her less time to socialize. 
Another would be to make it a habit not to be in the same room with her while she’s working. 
I’m sure you and your wife can find something else to do while the place is being cleaned. 
You could even go out for coffee or lunch unless your intuition is telling you she can’t be trusted. 
If that’s the case, you need another cleaning person. 
Dear Abby is written by Abigail Van Buren, also known as Jeanne Phillips, and was founded by her mother, Pauline Phillips. 
Contact Dear Abby at www.DearAbby.com or P.O. 
Box 69440, Los Angeles, CA 90069. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.9%Jeanne Phillips: 2.1%East Bay Times: 2.7%Confirmation Bias6.9%This article: 4.9%Jeanne Phillips: 0.5%East Bay Times: 0.3%Anchoring Bias4.9%This article: 5.2%Jeanne Phillips: 1.9%East Bay Times: 2.2%Availability Heuristic5.2%This article: 1.9%Jeanne Phillips: 1.2%East Bay Times: 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic1.9%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.4%East Bay Times: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Jeanne Phillips: 0.8%East Bay Times: 0.3%Overconfidence Bias3.1%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 2.1%East Bay Times: 2.9%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 1.5%East Bay Times: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.9%East Bay Times: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Jeanne Phillips: 0.7%East Bay Times: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect4.9%This article: 6.4%Jeanne Phillips: 1.2%East Bay Times: 0.9%Optimism Bias6.4%This article: 9.9%Jeanne Phillips: 2.0%East Bay Times: 1.0%Pessimism Bias9.9%This article: 15.7%Jeanne Phillips: 4.9%East Bay Times: 5.6%Negativity Bias15.7%This article: 3.9%Jeanne Phillips: 2.4%East Bay Times: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias3.9%This article: 1.1%Jeanne Phillips: 2.2%East Bay Times: 1.6%Fundamental Attribution Error1.1%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.1%East Bay Times: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.4%East Bay Times: 0.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Jeanne Phillips: 0.3%East Bay Times: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.5%East Bay Times: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.3%East Bay Times: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.7%East Bay Times: 0.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.4%East Bay Times: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.1%East Bay Times: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.3%Jeanne Phillips: 1.5%East Bay Times: 0.9%Appeal to Authority3.3%This article: 6.3%Jeanne Phillips: 1.7%East Bay Times: 0.9%False Dilemma6.3%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.3%East Bay Times: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 2.2%Jeanne Phillips: 0.3%East Bay Times: 0.1%Circular Reasoning2.2%This article: 6.3%Jeanne Phillips: 2.1%East Bay Times: 2.1%Hasty Generalization6.3%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 2.9%East Bay Times: 3.0%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.4%East Bay Times: 0.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.9%Jeanne Phillips: 0.5%East Bay Times: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.9%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.1%East Bay Times: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.9%East Bay Times: 0.7%Burden of Proof3.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.8%Jeanne Phillips: 0.8%East Bay Times: 1.2%Anecdotal5.8%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.6%East Bay Times: 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.8%Jeanne Phillips: 0.1%East Bay Times: 0.1%Middle Ground2.8%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.6%East Bay Times: 0.7%Unattributed Quote8.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.8%Jeanne Phillips: 2.8%East Bay Times: 4.6%Biased Writer Voice7.8%This article: 28.3%Jeanne Phillips: 10.5%East Bay Times: 3.4%Indoctrination28.3%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.1%East Bay Times: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Jeanne Phillips: 0.6%East Bay Times: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.0%

637 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers4.4%attributed speech609writer words
Selected voice

Helen

100%flagged-word coverage
11 attributed words39% of attributed speech81% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+93.4 ptsWriter: 6.6%Helen: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination-29.6 ptsWriter: 29.6%Helen: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-8.2 ptsWriter: 8.2%Helen: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.1 ptsWriter: 2.1%Helen: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.