Clown Vivek Ramaswamy Gets Booed Off The Stage ⁠93%

By John Amato⁠95%

8/1/2026, 4:38:12 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Ad Hominem, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 67.4% saturation with 122 hits. Analysis detected 752 faulty-reasoning hits from 181 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 84% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,998 of 27,714 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 92.80% of the article peer group.

MAGA creep Vivek Ramaswamy got no love from his home crowd during a speech at the Young Americans for Liberty conference in Cleveland, Ohio, on Wednesday, when he was unmercifully booed off the stage during his thirty-minute speech. 
Vivek made a name for himself within the MAGA cult by being a wealthy, fast-talking jackass drooling over Demented Donald. 
Now he's running for Governor. 
"The truth of the matter is, you know, no matter what happens in whichever direction we go, people of my generation have already made it; we're going to be fine," Vivek said. 
It's going to be your generation that pays the price." 
Audience members begin their outrage and catcalls. 
"Boooo!" 
Someone yelled, "You're a political cretin, and you need to get the f*** out of here!" 
The audience cheered. 
It's because of Trump's policies and insane decisions and behaviors that the younger generation sees a world with not much hope. 
Vivek then called those protesting whiners, not winners. 
Too bad the audience didn't have any produce to throw at him. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 22.7%John Amato: 8.6%Crooks and Liars: 7.4%Confirmation Bias22.7%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 1.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.6%John Amato: 1.7%Crooks and Liars: 2.9%Availability Heuristic11.6%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 0.6%Crooks and Liars: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 2.8%Crooks and Liars: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 2.4%Crooks and Liars: 7.3%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 5.5%John Amato: 1.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.4%Loss Aversion5.5%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 1.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 17.7%John Amato: 3.4%Crooks and Liars: 1.1%Optimism Bias17.7%This article: 5.5%John Amato: 3.7%Crooks and Liars: 2.0%Pessimism Bias5.5%This article: 67.4%John Amato: 19.4%Crooks and Liars: 17.5%Negativity Bias67.4%This article: 4.4%John Amato: 3.7%Crooks and Liars: 3.3%Self-Serving Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 3.5%Crooks and Liars: 2.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 25.4%John Amato: 6.5%Crooks and Liars: 2.3%In-Group Bias25.4%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 2.0%Crooks and Liars: 2.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 7.2%Crooks and Liars: 2.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 1.5%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 45.9%John Amato: 20.7%Crooks and Liars: 10.8%Ad Hominem45.9%This article: 11.0%John Amato: 1.0%Crooks and Liars: 2.4%Straw Man11.0%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 2.8%Crooks and Liars: 3.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 17.7%John Amato: 3.6%Crooks and Liars: 1.9%False Dilemma17.7%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 1.1%Crooks and Liars: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 19.2%Crooks and Liars: 10.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 0.6%Crooks and Liars: 1.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.7%John Amato: 0.3%Crooks and Liars: 0.8%Bandwagon1.7%This article: 31.5%John Amato: 5.5%Crooks and Liars: 7.7%Appeal to Emotion31.5%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 1.6%Crooks and Liars: 1.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 11.6%John Amato: 3.2%Crooks and Liars: 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.6%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 1.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 11.6%John Amato: 1.1%Crooks and Liars: 1.6%Anecdotal11.6%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.6%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 2.8%Crooks and Liars: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.9%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 0.6%Crooks and Liars: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 17.7%John Amato: 7.4%Crooks and Liars: 2.6%Unattributed Quote17.7%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 0.8%Crooks and Liars: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 58.6%John Amato: 30.8%Crooks and Liars: 23.7%Biased Writer Voice58.6%This article: 32.6%John Amato: 4.1%Crooks and Liars: 1.3%Indoctrination32.6%This article: 11.0%John Amato: 18.2%Crooks and Liars: 9.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias11.0%This article: 4.4%John Amato: 0.4%Crooks and Liars: 1.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%John Amato: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

181 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker28%attributed speech131writer words
Selected voice

Vivek Ramaswamy

100%flagged-word coverage
50 attributed words100% of attributed speech96% writer coverage
0%42.5%85.0%Biased Writer Voice-80.9 ptsWriter: 80.9%Vivek Ramaswamy: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+64.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Vivek Ramaswamy: 64.0%64.0%Indoctrination-45.0 ptsWriter: 45.0%Vivek Ramaswamy: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-15.3 ptsWriter: 15.3%Vivek Ramaswamy: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -6.1 ptsWriter: 6.1%Vivek Ramaswamy: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.